skip to main content
10.1145/3102071.3102082acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfdgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of controller-based locomotion on player experience in a virtual reality exploration game

Published:14 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Entertainment and in particular gaming is currently considered one of the main application scenarios for virtual reality (VR). The majority of current games rely on any form of locomotion through the virtual environment while some techniques can lead to simulator sickness. Game developers are currently implementing a wide variety of locomotion techniques to cope with simulator sickness (e.g. teleportation). In this work we implemented and evaluated four different controller-based locomotion methods that are popular in current VR games (free teleport, fixpoint teleport, touchpad-based, automatic). We conducted a user study (n = 24) in which participants explored a virtual zoo with these four different controller-based locomotion methods and assessed their effects on discomfort, presence, enjoyment, and affective state. The results of our study show that free teleport locomotion elicited least discomfort and provided the highest scores for enjoyment, presence, and affective state. With these results we gained valuable insights for developers and researchers implementing first person locomotion in VR experiences.

References

  1. Max Birk and Regan L Mandryk. 2013. Control your game-self: effects of controller type on enjoyment, motivation, and personality in game. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 685--694.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blueteak. 2016. QuiVr. Game [HTC Vive]. (20 Dec 2016). Alvios Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Evren Bozgeyikli, Andrew Raij, Srinivas Katkoori, and Rajiv Dubey. 2016. Point & Teleport Locomotion Technique for Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHIPLAY '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 205--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Margaret M Bradley and Peter J Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 25, 1 (1994), 49--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Xiang Cao, Clifton Forlines, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2007. Multi-user Interaction Using Handheld Projectors. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Capcom. 2017. Resident Evil 7. Game [PSVR]. (24 Jan 2017). Capcom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rudolph P Darken, William R Cockayne, and David Carmein. 1997. The omni-directional treadmill: a locomotion device for virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 213--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Simon Davis, Keith Nesbitt, and Eugene Nalivaiko. 2014. A systematic review of cybersickness. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment. ACM, 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Julian Frommel, Katja Rogers, Thomas Dreja, Julian Winterfeldt, Christian Hunger, Maximilian Bär, and Michael Weber. 2016. 2084 -- Safe New World: Designing Ubiquitous Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 53--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Yue Gao and Regan Mandryk. 2012. The Acute Cognitive Benefits of Casual Exergame Play. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1863--1872. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jan Gugenheimer, Evgeny Stemasov, Julian Frommel, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. ShareVR: Enabling Co-Located Experiences for Virtual Reality between HMD and Non-HMD Users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. HTC Corporation. 2016. HTC Vive. https://www.htcvive.com. (2016). Accessed: 2017-03-03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. HTC Corporation. 2016. Teleporting (Vive Home Documentation). https://www.vive.com/us/support/category_howto/839430.html. (2016). Accessed: 2017-03-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Downpour Interactive. 2016. Onward. Game [HTC Vive]. (30 Aug 2016). Downpour Interactive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jarmo Kauko and Jonna Häkkilä. 2010. Shared-screen Social Gaming with Portable Devices. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 317--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Robert S Kennedy, Norman E Lane, Kevin S Berbaum, and Michael G Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The international journal of aviation psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. JJ-W Lin, Henry Been-Lirn Duh, Donald E Parker, Habib Abi-Rached, and Thomas A Furness. 2002. Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In Virtual Reality, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE. IEEE, 164--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Siân E. Lindley, James Le Couteur, and Nadia L. Berthouze. 2008. Stirring Up Experience Through Movement in Game Play: Effects on Engagement and Social Behaviour. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 511--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Edward McAuley, Terry Duncan, and Vance V Tammen. 1989. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 60, 1 (1989), 48--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Rory McGloin, Kirstie M Farrar, and Marina Krcmar. 2011. The impact of controller naturalness on spatial presence, gamer enjoyment, and perceived realism in a tennis simulation video game. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 20, 4 (2011), 309--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sevenedge Interactive Media. 2016. Driftwatch VR. Game [HTC Vive]. (1 Dec 2016). Sevenedge Interactive Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Elisa D Mekler, Julia Ayumi Bopp, Alexandre N Tuch, and Klaus Opwis. 2014. A systematic review of quantitative studies on the enjoyment of digital entertainment games. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 927--936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Florian Mueller, Stefan Agamanolis, and Rosalind Picard. 2003. Exertion Interfaces: Sports over a Distance for Social Bonding and Fun. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 561--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Oculus VR, LLC. 2016. Oculus Best Practices. https://developer3.oculus.com/documentation/intro-vr/latest/concepts/bp_intro/. (2016). Accessed: 2017-03-03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Oculus VR, LLC. 2016. Oculus Touch. https://www.oculus.com/rift/. (2016). Accessed: 2017-03-03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharif Razzaque, Zachariah Kohn, and Mary C Whitton. 2001. Redirected walking. In Proceedings of EUROGRAPHICS, Vol. 9. Citeseer, 105--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Daniel M Shaffer, Corey P Carbonara, and Lucy Popova. 2014. Controller required? The impact of natural mapping on interactivity, realism, presence, and enjoyment in motion-based video games. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 23, 3 (2014), 267--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mel Slater, Anthony Steed, and Martin Usoh. 1995. The virtual treadmill: A naturalistic metaphor for navigation in immersive virtual environments. In Virtual EnvironmentsâĂŹ 95. Springer, 135--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sony Corporation. 2016. PlayStation VR. https://www.playstation.com/en-us/explore/playstation-vr/. (2016). Accessed: 2017-03-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. TN.Interactive. 2017. Deadly Labyrinth VR. Game [Google Cardboard]. (20 Feb 2017). TN.Interactive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaywalkers Interactive Vertigo Games. 2016. Arizona Sunshine. Game [HTC Vive]. (6 Dec 2016). Vertigo Games.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Yan Xu, Maribeth Gandy, Sami Deen, Brian Schrank, Kim Spreen, Michael Gorbsky, Timothy White, Evan Barba, Iulian Radu, Jay Bolter, and Blair MacIntyre. 2008. BragFish: Exploring Physical and Social Interaction in Co-located Handheld Augmented Reality Games. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 276--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Effects of controller-based locomotion on player experience in a virtual reality exploration game

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          FDG '17: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games
          August 2017
          545 pages
          ISBN:9781450353199
          DOI:10.1145/3102071

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 August 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          FDG '17 Paper Acceptance Rate36of89submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate152of415submissions,37%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader