skip to main content
10.1145/3105971.3105981acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvinciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Visualizing activity traces to support collaborative literature searching

Published:14 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Following recent advances in visual interfaces for search, we investigate how to visualize activity traces to support collaborative information-seeking. We implemented a prototype system that visualizes traces of three types of activities (queries typed, articles bookmarked, and interested keywords) on top of a recent visual search system. The current interface of the system provides an interactive keyword visualization to support exploratory search. We designed two icons to visualize user interactions with the keywords and articles. We also implemented a time line to explicitly display the issued queries and additional details about the interactions. We conducted a longitudinal user study to evaluate the usability of these visualizations. We found that the visualization of traces of issued queries and bookmarked articles help the users to better monitor the progress of the collaborators, increase collaboration, and reassure their findings. Traces of interested keywords support sub-topic identification. Furthermore, activity traces of collaborators help the users to learn about the system features. The findings and the novel collaborative system provide valuable insights and tools into future research on designing interfaces for collaborative information-seeking.

References

  1. Ahlberg, C., & Shneiderman, B. (1994, April). Visual information seeking: Tight coupling of dynamic query filters with starfield displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 313--317). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ahn, J. W., & Brusilovsky, P. (2013). Adaptive visualization for exploratory information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 49(5), 1139--1164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alsallakh, B., Micallef, L., Aigner, W., Hauser, H., Miksch, S., & Rodgers, P. (2014, June). Visualizing sets and set-typed data: State-of-the-art and future challenges. In Eurographics conference on Visualization (EuroVis)-State of The Art Reports (pp. 1--21).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Amershi, S. and Morris, M. R. CoSearch: a system for co-located collaborative web search. In Proc.CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1647--1656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Athukorala, K., Hoggan, E., Lehtiö, A., Ruotsalo, T., & Jacucci, G. (2013). Information-seeking behaviors of computer scientists: Challenges for electronic literature search tools. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Athukorala, K., Głowacka, D., Jacucci, G., Oulasvirta, A., & Vreeken, J. (2016). Is exploratory search different? A comparison of information search behavior for exploratory and lookup tasks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2635--2651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bateman, S. S., Gutwin, C. A., and McCalla, G. I. Social navigation for loosely-coupled in-formation seeking in tightly-knit groups using webwear. In Proc.CSCW 2013, ACM Press(2013), 955--966. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bentley, R., Horstmann, T. and Trevor, J. The World Wide Web as enabling technology for CSCW: The case of BSCW. In Proc. Groupware and the World Wide Web 1997, 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Brooke, J. SUS: A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, (1996), 189--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruce, H. R., Fidel, A. M., Pejtersen, S., Dumais, J., Grudina and Poltrock, S. A comparison of collaborative information retrieval (CIR) behaviours of two design teams. Information seeking in context, (2002), 147--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chau, D. H., Kittur, A., Hong, J. I., & Faloutsos, C. (2011, May). Apolo: making sense of large network data by combining rich user interaction and machine learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 167--176). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dourish, P. & Chalmers, M. Running out of space:Models of information navigation. In Proc. HCI, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Freyne, J. R., Farzan, P., Brusilovsky, B., Smyth and Coyle, M. Collecting community wis-dom: integrating social search & social navigation. In Proc. IUI 2007, (2007), 52--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Galegher, J. and Kraut, R. E. Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: a field experiment in group writing. In Proc. CSCW 1990, 1990, ACM (1990), 65--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Glowacka, D., Ruotsalo, T., Konuyshkova, K., Kaski, S., & Jacucci, G. (2013, March). Directing exploratory search: Reinforcement learning from user interactions with keywords. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 117--128). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. González-Ibáñez, Roberto, and Chirag Shah. "Coagmento: A system for supporting collabo-rative information seeking." In. Proc. ASIST 48.1 (2011): 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 11(3--4), 2002, 411--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hill, W. C., Hollan, J. D., Wroblewski, D. and McCandless, T. Edit Wear and Read Wear. In Proc. CHI 1992, ACM Press (1992), 3--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Keller, R. M., Wolfe, S. R., Chen, J. R., Rabinowitz, J. L. and Mathe, N. A bookmarking service for organizing and sharing URLs. International World Wide Web Conference, (1998), 1103 -- 1114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Klouche, K., Ruotsalo, T., Cabral, D., Andolina, S., Bellucci, A., & Jacucci, G. (2015, April). Designing for exploratory search on touch devices. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4189--4198). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Klouche, K., Ruotsalo, T., Micallef, L., Andolina, S., & Jacucci, G. (2017, March). Visual Re-Ranking for Multi-Aspect Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (pp. 57--66). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kucher, K., & Kerren, A. (2015, April). Text visualization techniques: Taxonomy, visual survey, and community insights. In Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2015 IEEE Pacific (pp. 117--121). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Kuhlthau, C. C. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. JASIST, 42, (1991), 361-- 371.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kules, W., Wilson, M. L., & Shneiderman, B. (2008). From keyword search to exploration: How result visualization aids discovery on the web. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Morris, M. R. Collaborative search revisited. In Proc. CSCW 2013, ACM (2013), 1181--1192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Morris, M. R. and Horvitz, E. S3: Storable, Shareable Search. In Proc. Interact, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Morris, M. R. and Horvitz, E. SearchTogether: an interface for collaborative web search. ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, (2007), 3--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Morris, M. R., Teevan, J. and Panovich, K. A comparison of information seeking using search engines and social networks. In Proc. AAAI 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris, M.R. A Survey of Collaborative Web Search Practices. In Proc. CHI. 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1657--1660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Patil, S. and Kobsa, A. (2003). The Challenges in Preserving Privacy in Awareness Systems. ISR Technical Report #UCI-ISR-03-3, Institute of Software Research, University of Cali-fornia, Irvine, http://www.isr.uci.edu/tech_reports/UCI-ISR-03-3.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Paul, Sharoda A., and Meredith Ringel Morris. "CoSense: enhancing sensemaking for col-laborative web search." In Proc. SIGCHI'09. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Prinz, W. NESSIE: an awareness environment for cooperative settings. In Proc. ECSCW 1999, (1999), 391--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Purcell, K. Search and email still top the list of most popular online activities. Pew Internet &American Life Project. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruotsalo, T., Peltonen, J., Eugster, M., Głowacka, D., Konyushkova, K., Athukorala, K., ... & Kaski, S. (2013, October). Directing exploratory search with interactive intent modeling. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management (pp. 1759--1764). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ruotsalo, T., Jacucci, G., Myllymäki, P., & Kaski, S. (2015). Interactive intent modeling: Information discovery beyond search. Communications of the ACM, 58(1), 86--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Shneiderman, B. (1996, September). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Visual Languages, 1996. Proceedings., IEEE Symposium on (pp. 336--343). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Shah, Chirag, and Gary Marchionini. "Awareness in collaborative information seeking." JASIST 61.10 (2010): 1970--1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Smyth, B., Balfe, E., Freyne, J., Briggs, P., Coyle, M. and Boydell, O. Exploiting Query Repetition and Regularity in an Adaptive Community-Based Web Search Engine. In Proc. UMUAI, 14(5), (2004), 383--423. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Stasko, J., Görg, C., & Liu, Z. (2008). Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Information visualization, 7(2), 118--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Verbert, K., Parra, D., Brusilovsky, P., & Duval, E. (2013, March). Visualizing recommendations to support exploration, transparency and controllability. InProceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces(pp. 351--362). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Wexelblat, A. and Maes, P. Footprints: history-rich tools for information foraging. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999). 270--277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Wilson, M. L. Evaluating collaborative information-seeking interfaces with a search-oriented inspection method and re-framed information seeking theory. Inf. proc. & man-agement, 46(6), (2010), 718--732. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Visualizing activity traces to support collaborative literature searching

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        VINCI '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction
        August 2017
        158 pages
        ISBN:9781450352925
        DOI:10.1145/3105971

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 August 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        VINCI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate12of27submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate71of193submissions,37%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader