skip to main content
10.1145/3106426.3106516acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Brand key asset discovery via cluster-wise biased discriminant projection

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Accurate and effective discovery of a brand's key assets, namely, Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) and potential customers, plays an essential role in marketing campaigns. In a massive online social network, brands are challenged with identifying a small portion of key assets over an enormous volume of irrelevant users, making the problem a highly imbalanced one. Moreover, having to deal with social media data that are usually high-dimensional, the task of brand key asset discovery can be immensely expensive yet inaccurate if the information are not processed efficiently to extract representative features from the original space prior to the learning process. To address the above issues, we propose a novel method dubbed Cluster-wise Biased Discriminant Projection (CBDP) to uncover the compact and informative features from users' data for brand key asset discovery. CBDP conducts a two-layer learning procedure. In the first layer, a Discriminant Clustering (DC) scheme is developed to partition the original dataset into clusters with maximum discriminant capacity. In the second layer, a Biased Discriminant Projection (BDP) algorithm is proposed and performed on each cluster to map the high-dimensional data to the low-dimensional subspace, where the discriminant information of classes with high importance/preference is preserved. A unified mapping function of CBDP is finally established by integrating these two layers. Experiments on both synthetic examples and a real-world brand key asset dataset validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

References

  1. M. Belkin and P. Niyogi. 2001. Laplacian Eigenmaps and Spectral Techniques for Embedding and Clustering. In NIPS 14. 585--591. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. D. Berger and N. I. Nasr. 1998. Customer lifetime value: Marketing models and applications. Journal of interactive marketing 12, 1 (1998), 17--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. B. Bi, L. Ji, and Q. Hu. 2008. Comparative Study on Classification Techniques to Identify Potential Customers. In Proc. ISCID, Vol. 2. 308--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. 2011. LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 3 (2011), 27:1--27:27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. P. Cunningham and Z. Ghahramani. 2015. Linear Dimensionality Reduction: Survey, Insights, and Generalizations. Journal of Machine Learning Research 16 (2015), 2859--2900. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Z. Fan, Y. Xu, and D. Zhang. 2011. Local Linear Discriminant Analysis Framework Using Sample Neighbors. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 22, 7 (2011), 1119--1132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. A. Fisher. 1936. The Use of Multiple Measurements in Taxonomic Problems. Ann. Eugen. 7 (1936), 179--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. X. He, S. Yan, Y. Hu, P. Niyogi, and H.-J. Zhang. 2005. Face recognition using Laplacianfaces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 3 (2005), 328--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Hotelling. 1933. Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables Into Principal Components. J. Edu. Psychol. 24 (1933), 417--441, 498--520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. F. Li and T. C. Du. 2011. Who is talking? An ontology-based opinion leader identification framework for word-of-mouth marketing in online social blogs. Decision Support Systems 51, 1 (2011), 190--197. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Liu, Z. Gu, and Y.-M. Cheung. 2016. Supervised Manifold Learning for Media Interestingness Prediction. In Proc. of the MediaEval 2016 Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Y. Liu, Y. Liu, K. C. C. Chan, and K. A. Hua. 2014. Hybrid Manifold Embedding. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 25, 12 (2014), 2295--2302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D. Luo, F. Nie, C. Ding, and H. Huang. 2011. Multi-subspace representation and discovery. In ECML/PKDD. 405--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Nie, W. Zhu, and X. Li. 2017. Unsupervised Large Graph Embedding. In Proc. 31st AAAI. 2422--2428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, and T. Maenpaa. 2002. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 7 (2002), 971--987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Rajaraman and J. D. Ullman. 2011. Mining of Massive Datasets. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Rodriguez and A. Laio. 2014. Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Science 344, 6191 (2014), 1492--1496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bernhard Schölkopf, Alex J. Smola, Robert C. Williamson, and Peter L. Bartlett. 2000. New Support Vector Algorithms. Neural Comput. 12, 5 (2000), 1207--1245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. H. Sharara, L. Getoor, and M. Norton. 2011. Active Surveying: A Probabilistic Approach for Identifying Key Opinion Leaders. In Proc. 22nd IJCAI. 1485--1490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Yan, Y. Hu, D. Xu, H.-J. Zhang, B. Zhang, and Q. Cheng. 2007. Nonlinear Discriminant Analysis on Embedded Manifold. IEEE Trans. Cir. and Sys. for Video Technol. 17, 4 (2007), 468--477. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Z. Zhai, H. Xu, and P. Jia. 2008. Identifying Opinion Leaders in BBS. In Proc. IEEE/WIC/ACM WI-IAT'08, Vol. 3. 398--401. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Brand key asset discovery via cluster-wise biased discriminant projection

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WI '17: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence
        August 2017
        1284 pages
        ISBN:9781450349512
        DOI:10.1145/3106426

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 August 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate118of178submissions,66%Overall Acceptance Rate118of178submissions,66%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader