ABSTRACT
The opportunity to control and fine-tune the behavior of biological cells is a fascinating possibility for many diverse disciplines, ranging from medicine and ecology, to chemical industry and space exploration. While synthetic biology is providing novel tools to reprogram cell behavior from their genetic code, many challenges need to be solved before it can become a true engineering discipline, such as reliability, safety assurance, reproducibility and stability. This paper aims to understand the limits in the controllability of the behavior of a natural (non-engineered) biological cell. In particular, the focus is on cell metabolism, and its natural regulation mechanisms, and their ability to react and change according to the chemical characteristics of the external environment. To understand the aforementioned limits of this ability, molecular communication is used to abstract biological cells into a series of channels that propagate information on the chemical composition of the extracellular environment to the cell's behavior in terms of uptake and consumption of chemical compounds, and growth rate. This provides an information-theoretic framework to analyze the upper bound limit to the capacity of these channels to propagate information, which is based on a well-known and computationally efficient metabolic simulation technique. A numerical study is performed on two human gut microbes, where the upper bound is estimated for different environmental compounds, showing there is a potential for future practical applications.
- I F Akyildiz, M Pierobon, S Balasubramaniam, and Y Koucheryavy. 2015. The internet of bio-nano things. IEEE Communications Magazine 53, 3 (2015), 32--40. Google ScholarCross Ref
- U Alon. 2006. An Introduction to Systems Biology - Design Principles of Biological Circuits. Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
- G JE Baart and D E Martens. 2012. Genome-scale metabolic models: reconstruction and analysis. Neisseria meningitidis: Advanced Methods and Protocols (2012), 107--126.Google Scholar
- M Cashman, J L Catlett, M B Cohen, N R Buan, Z Sakkaff, M Pierobon, and C A Kelley. 2017. BioSIMP: Using Software Testing Techniques for Sampling and Inference in Biological Organisms. ICSE workshop on Software Engineering for Computational Science (SE4S) (2017).Google Scholar
- M B Cohen, J Firestone, and M Pierobon. 2016. The Assurance Timeline: Building Assurance Cases for Synthetic Biology. In In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Assurance Cases for Software-Intensive Systems (ASSURE 2016). 75--86. Google ScholarCross Ref
- J Dobson. 2008. Remote control of cellular behaviour with magnetic nanoparticles. Nature nanotechnology 3, 3 (2008), 139--143. Google ScholarCross Ref
- B Dridi, M Henry, A El Khechine, D Raoult, and M Drancourt. 2009. High prevalence of Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanosphaera stadtmanae detected in the human gut using an improved DNA detection protocol. PloS one 4, 9 (2009), e7063.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E Gonçalves, J Bucher, A Ryll, J Niklas, K Mauch, S Klamt, M Rocha, and J Saez-Rodriguez. 2013. Bridging the layers: towards integration of signal transduction, regulation and metabolism into mathematical models. Molecular BioSystems 9, 7 (2013), 1576--1583. Google ScholarCross Ref
- KBase. 2011. Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase (KBase). http://kbase.us. (2011). [Online;accessed 7-April-2017].Google Scholar
- R Krajmalnik-Brown, Z-E Ilhan, D-W Kang, and J K DiBaise. 2012. Effects of gut microbes on nutrient absorption and energy regulation. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 27, 2 (2012), 201--214. Google ScholarCross Ref
- C M Metallo and M G Vander Heiden. 2013. Understanding Metabolic Regulation and Its Influence on Cell Physiology. Molecular Cell 49 (February 2013), 388--398. Google ScholarCross Ref
- D Ndeh, A Rogowski, A Cartmell, A S Luis, A Baslé, J Gray, I Venditto, J Briggs, X Zhang, A Labourel, and et al. 2017. Complex pectin metabolism by gut bacteria reveals novel catalytic functions. Nature 544, 7648 (2017), 65--70. Google ScholarCross Ref
- D L Nelson and M M Cox. 2005. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. W. H. Freeman, Chapter 12.2, 425--429.Google Scholar
- J D Orth, I Thiele, and B Ø Palsson. 2010. What is flux balance analysis? Nature biotechnology 28, 3 (2010), 245--248. Google ScholarCross Ref
- M Pierobon, Z Sakkaff, J L Catlett, and N R Buan. 2016. Mutual information upper bound of molecular communication based on cell metabolism. In Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), 2016 IEEE 17th International Workshop on. IEEE, 1--6. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z Sakkaff. 2016. Characterization of Molecular Communication Based on Cell Metabolism Through Mutual Information and Flux Balance Analysis. Master's thesis. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
- A A Salyers. 1984. Bacteroides of the human lower intestinal tract. Annual Reviews in Microbiology 38, 1 (1984), 293--313. Google ScholarCross Ref
- G Tkačik, C G Callan Jr., and W Bialek. 2008. Information capacity of genetic regulatory elements. PHYSICAL REVIEW E 78 (2008), 011910(17).Google Scholar
- J E Toettcher, C A Voigt, Orion D Weiner, and Wendell A Lim. 2011. The promise of optogenetics in cell biology: interrogating molecular circuits in space and time. Nature methods 8, 1 (2011), 35--38. Google ScholarCross Ref
- J Xu, M K Bjursell, J Himrod, S Deng, L K Carmichael, H C Chiang, L V Hooper, and J I Gordon. 2003. A genomic view of the human-Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron symbiosis. Science 299, 5615 (2003), 2074--2076. Google ScholarCross Ref
- End-to-end molecular communication channels in cell metabolism: an information theoretic study
Recommendations
Molecular communication on artificial cell membranes
BIONETICS '08: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Bio-Inspired Models of Network, Information and Computing SytemsMolecular communication is a bio-inspired communication paradigm using molecules as information carriers. In this paper, we built an example molecular communication system in aqueous media, which includes propagation of molecular capsules capable of ...
On Channel Capacity and Error Compensation in Molecular Communication
Transactions on Computational Systems Biology XMolecular communication is a novel paradigm that uses molecules as an information carrier to enable nanomachines to communicate with each other. Controlled molecule delivery between two nanomachines is one of the most important challenges which must be ...
Applying molecular communication theory to estimate information loss in cell signal transduction: an approach based on cancer transcriptomics
NANOCOM '18: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and CommunicationSignal transduction pathways are chemical communication channels embedded in biological cells, and they propagate information from the environment to regulate cell growth and proliferation, among other cell's behaviors. Disruptions in the normal ...
Comments