Han Zeng
ABSTRACT
The next-generation sequencing (NGS) is very important for genetics. One of the most popular sequencing approaches is exome sequencing, which is a lower cost and high-throughput sequencing method. Here, this study first reviews the history of next-generation sequencing and exome sequencing. And then, it illustrates four genetic variants in tumor as well as the application of the exome sequencing for cancer research. Finally, it discusses the current analysis methods for exome sequencing and related tools.
- Watson, J. D. and Crick, F. H. 1953. The structure of DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol.18:123--31. Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Goodwin, S., Mcpherson, J. D., and Mccombie, W. R. 2016. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nature Reviews Genetics. 17:333. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lou, D. I., Hussmann, J. A. Mcbee, R. M., et al. 2013. High-throughput DNA sequencing errors are reduced by orders of magnitude using circle sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.110:19872. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pabinger, S., Dander, A., Fischer, M., et al. 2013. A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data. Briefings in Bioinformatics.15:256--78. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, Z., Liu, X., Yang, B. Z., and Gelernter, J. 2013. The role and challenges of exome sequencing in studies of human diseases. Frontiers in Genetics. 4:160. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ding, L., Wendl, M. C., Mcmichael, J. F., and Raphael, B. J. 2014. Expanding the computational toolbox for mining cancer genomes. Nature Reviews Genetics. 15:556--70. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xue, Y., Ankala, A., Wilcox, W. R., and Hegde, M. R. 2014. Solving the molecular diagnostic testing conundrum for Mendelian disorders in the era of next-generation sequencing: single-gene, gene panel, or exome/genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 17:444--51. Google ScholarCross Ref
- David, C. S., Han, L., Li, J., et al. 2013. Finding the lost treasures in exome sequencing data. Trends in Genetics. 29:593. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jr CJL, Bohr VA. DNA repair in drug resistance: Studies on the repair process at the level of the gene: Springer US; 1991.Google Scholar
- Paraf, F., Jothy, S., Meir, E. G. V. 1997. Brain tumor-polyposis syndrome: two genetic diseases? Journal of Clinical Oncology Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 15:2744. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Giuliana, A., Cécile, G., Sandrine, I., and Jessica Z. R. 2012. Next-generation sequencing identified new oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in human hepatic tumors. Oncoimmunology. 1:1612--3. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ma, H., Ma, Q., Ma, C., and Ma, L. 2011. Isolation and characterization of gene-derived single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers in Scylla paramamosain. Biochemical Systematics & Ecology. 39:419--24. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goya, R., Sun, M. G. F., Morin, R. D., et al. 2010. SNVMix: predicting single nucleotide variants from next-generation sequencing of tumors. Bioinformatics. 26:730. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Albers, C. A., Lunter, G., Macarthur, D. G., Mcvean, G., Ouwehand, W. H., and Durbin, R. 2011. Dindel: accurate indel calls from short-read data. Genome Research. 21:961. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Abyzov, A., Li, S., and Gerstein, M. B. 2015. Understanding genome structural variations. Oncotarget. 7:7370--1. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ionitalaza, I., Rogers, A. J., Lange, C., Raby, B. A., and Lee, C. 2009. Genetic association analysis of copy-number variation (CNV) in human disease pathogenesis. Genomics. 93:22--6. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhao, Y., Deng, X., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., and Liu, Y. 2012. Genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair genes XRCC1 and XRCC3 and risk of colorectal cancer in Chinese population. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention Apjcp. 13:665--9. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Koboldt, D. C., Zhang, Q., Larson, D. E., et al. 2012. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Research. 22:568--76. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jiao, Y., Yonescu, R., Offerhaus, G. J. A., et al. 2014. Whole-exome sequencing of pancreatic neoplasms with acinar differentiation. Journal of Pathology. 232:428. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liang, H., Cheung, L. W. T., Li, J., et al. 2012. Whole-exome sequencing combined with functional genomics reveals novel candidate driver cancer genes in endometrial cancer. Genome Research. 22:2120. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adalsteinsson, V. A., Lohr, J. G., Cibulskis, K., et al. 2014. Abstract 993: Whole exome sequencing of CTCs as a window into metastatic cancer. Cancer Research. 74(19). Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dietz, S., Schirmer, U., Mercé, C., et al. 2016. Low input whole-exome sequencing to determine the representation of the tumor exome in circulating DNA of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Plos One. 11:e0161012. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li, Y., Peng, Y., Jiang, X., et al. 2016. Whole exome sequencing of thymic neuroendocrine tumor with ectopic ACTH syndrome. European Journal of Endocrinology. 176:EJE-16-0546. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhang, J., Liu, J., Sun, J., Chen, C., Foltz, G., and Lin, B. 2014. Identifying driver mutations from sequencing data of heterogeneous tumors in the era of personalized genome sequencing. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 15:244. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hadfield, J. and Eldridge, M. D. 2014. Multi-genome alignment for quality control and contamination screening of next-generation sequencing data. Frontiers in Genetics. 5:31. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Besnard, G., Bertrand, J. A. M., Delahaie, B., Bourgeois, Y. X. C., Lhuillier, E., and Thébaud, C. 2015. Valuing museum specimens: high‐throughput DNA sequencing on historical collections of New Guinea crowned pigeons (Goura). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 117:71--82. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Templeton, J. E. L., Brotherton, P. M., Llamas, B., et al. 2013. Adelaide research and scholarship: dna capture and next-generation sequencing can recover whole mitochondrial genomes from highly degraded samples for human identification. Biomed Central. 2013.Google Scholar
- Piironen, K. 2013. Establishment of a laboratory workflow for analysis of exonic and intronic regions with next-generation sequencing. Metropolia Ammattikorkeakoulu. 2013.Google Scholar
- Hiltemann, S., Jenster, G., Trapman, J., Van, S. P., Stubbs, A. 2015. Discriminating somatic and germline mutations in tumor DNA samples without matching normals. Genome Research. 25:1382. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nagle, D. L, Karim, M. A., Woolf, E. A., et al. 1996. Identification and mutation analysis of the complete gene for Chediak|[ndash]|Higashi syndrome. Nature Genetics. 14:307--11. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kotoula, V., Papadopoulou, K., Charalambous, E., et al. 2014. Abstract 3579: Routinely applicable, highly multiplexed triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) genotyping. Cancer Research. 74(19). Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhou, J. and Hertz, J. M. 1992. Complete amino acid sequence of the human alpha 5 (IV) collagen chain and identification of a single-base mutation in exon 23 converting glycine 521 in the collagenous domain to cysteine in an Alport syndrome patient. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 267:12475--81.Google Scholar
- Lunter, G. 2007. Probabilistic whole-genome alignments reveal high indel rates in the human and mouse genomes. Bioinformatics. 23:i289. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cartwright, R. A. 2009. Problems and solutions for estimating indel rates and length distributions. Molecular Biology & Evolution. 26:473. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, K., Chen, L., Fan, X., Wallis, J., Ding, L., and Weinstock, G. 2014. TIGRA: a targeted iterative graph routing assembler for breakpoint assembly. Genome Research. 24:310--7. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schloss, P. D., Gevers, D., and Westcott, S. L. 2011. Reducing the effects of pcr amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16s rrna-based studies. Plos One. 6:e27310. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brueffer, C.2013. Quality control and analysis of rna-seq data from breast cancer tumor samples. Biology & Life Sciences.Google Scholar
- Gautam, C. K., Madhav, M., Vaibhav, V., Rajasekaran, R., Ramanathan, K., and Shanthi, V. 2014. Structural and functional impact of genetic variations in FOXC2: a computational study. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review & Research. 25.Google Scholar
- Hilbert, L., Federici, A. B., Baronciani, L., Dallagiovanna, S., and Mazurier, C. 2004. A new candidate mutation, G1629R, in a patient with type 2A von Willebrand's disease: basic mechanisms and clinical implications. Haematologica. 89:1128--33.Google Scholar
- Mikhailenko, D. S. and Nemtsova, M. V. 2016. Point somatic mutations in bladder cancer: key carcinogenesis events, diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets. Urologiia. 100--5.Google Scholar
- Wang, K., Li, M., and Hakonarson, H. 2010. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Research. 38:e164. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cingolani, P., Platts, A., Le, L. W., et al. 2012. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. 6:80--92. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Woolfe, A., Mullikin, J. C., and Elnitski, L. 2010. Genomic features defining exonic variants that modulate splicing. Genome Biology. 11:R20. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Khurana, E., Fu, Y., Colonna, V., et al. 2013. Integrative annotation of variants from 1092 humans: application to cancer genomics. Science. 342:84. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chelala, C., Khan, A., and Lemoine, N. R. 2009. SNPnexus: a web database for functional annotation of newly discovered and public domain single nucleotide polymorphisms. Bioinformatics. 25:655--61. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yandell, M., Huff, C., Hao, H., et al. 2011. A probabilistic disease-gene finder for personal genomes. Genome Research. 21:1529--42. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paila, U., Chapman, B. A., Kirchner, R., and Quinlan, A. R. 2013. GEMINI: Integrative Exploration of Genetic Variation and Genome Annotations. Plos Computational Biology. 9:e1003153. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nakken, S., Alseth, I., and Rognes, T. 2007. Computational prediction of the effects of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in human DNA repair genes. 145:1273--9.Google Scholar
- Ng, P. C. and Henikoff, S. 2003. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Research. 31:3812--4. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reva, B., Antipin, Y., and Sander, C. 2011. Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics. Nucleic Acids Research. 39:e118. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gonzálezpérez, A. and Lópezbigas, N. 2011. Improving the assessment of the outcome of nonsynonymous SNVs with a consensus deleteriousness score, Condel. American Journal of Human Genetics. 88:440--9. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wong, W. C., Kim, D., Carter, H., Diekhans, M., Ryan, M. C., and Karchin, R. 2011. CHASM and SNVBox: toolkit for detecting biologically important single nucleotide mutations in cancer. Bioinformatics. 27:2147--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gonzalez-Perez, A., Deu-Pons, J., and Lopez-Bigas, N. 2012. Improving the prediction of the functional impact of cancer mutations by baseline tolerance transformation. Genome Medicine. 4:89. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gonzalezperez, A. and Lopezbigas, N. 2012. Functional impact bias reveals cancer drivers. Nucleic Acids Research. 40:e169. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reimand, J. and Bader, G. D. 2013. Systematic analysis of somatic mutations in phosphorylation signaling predicts novel cancer drivers. Molecular Systems Biology. 9:637. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Green, E. D. and Guyer, M. S. 2011. Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside. Nature. 470:204--13. Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A Review: Exome Sequencing in Tumors
Recommendations
Alignment-Free sequence comparison based on next generation sequencing reads: extended abstract
RECOMB'12: Proceedings of the 16th Annual international conference on Research in Computational Molecular BiologyNext generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have generated enormous amount of shotgun read data and assembly of the reads can be challenging, especially for organisms without template sequences. We study the power of genome comparison based on shotgun ...
TRA: tandem repeat assembler for next generation sequences
ACSW '17: Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week MulticonferenceEukaryotic genomes contain high volumes of intronic and intergenic regions in which repetitive sequences are abundant. These repetitive sequences represent challenges in genomic assignment of short read sequences generated through next generation ...
Enabling large-scale next-generation sequence assembly with Blacklight
A variety of extremely challenging biological sequence analyses were conducted on the XSEDE large shared memory resource Blacklight, using current bioinformatics tools and encompassing a wide range of scientific applications. These include genomic ...
Comments