skip to main content
10.1145/3126594.3126617acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Panning and Zooming High-Resolution Panoramas in Virtual Reality Devices

Published:20 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Two recent innovations in immersive media include the ability to capture very high resolution panoramic imagery, and the rise of consumer level heads-up displays for virtual reality. Unfortunately, zooming to examine the high resolution in VR breaks the basic contract with the user, that the FOV of the visual field matches the FOV of the imagery. In this paper, we study methods to overcome this restriction to allow high resolution panoramic imagery to be able to be explored in VR. We introduce and test new interface modalities for exploring high resolution panoramic imagery in VR. In particular, we demonstrate that limiting the visual FOV of the zoomed in imagery to the central portion of the visual field, and modulating the transparency or zoom level of the imagery during rapid panning, reduce simulator sickness and help with targeting tasks.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p279-chang.mp4

mp4

324.4 MB

References

  1. Daniel Ambrosi. 2015. Dreamscapes. http://www.danielambrosi.com/Dreamscapes/. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Caroline Appert, Olivier Chapuis, and Emmanuel Pietriga. 2010. High-precision magnification lenses. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 273--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Patrick Baudisch, Nathaniel Good, Victoria Bellotti, and Pamela Schraedley. 2002. Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 259--266. Figure 7: A high resolution Deep Dream photograph and a zoomed-in detail. Courtesy of Daniel Ambrosi. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eric A. Bier, Maureen C. Stone, Ken Pier, William Buxton, and Tony D. DeRose. 1993. Toolglass and Magic Lenses: The See-through Interface. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '93). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marianne Sheelagh Therese Carpendale. 1999. A framework for elastic presentation space. Ph.D. Dissertation. Simon Fraser University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Shenchang Eric Chen. 1995. QuickTime VR: An Image-based Approach to Virtual Environment Navigation. In Proceedings of the 22Nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '95). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 29--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Andy Cockburn, Amy Karlson, and Benjamin B. Bederson. 2008. A Review of Overview+Detail, Zooming, and Focus+Context Interfaces, In ACM Surveys. Comput. Surveys (January 2008). https: //www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/ a-review-of-overviewdetail-zooming-and-focuscontext-interfaces/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mark H Draper, Erik S Viirre, Thomas A Furness, and Valerie J Gawron. 2001. Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43, 1 (2001), 129--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Facebook. 2016. 360. https://facebook360.fb.com/. (05 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ajoy S Fernandes and Steven K Feiner. 2016. Combating VR sickness through subtle dynamic field-of-view modification. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 201--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Karen A. Frenkel. 2010. Panning for Science. Science 330, 6005 (2010), 748--749.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Google+. 2015. 360 Panoramas. https://plus.google.com/s/%23Panorama_360. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C.Y. Ip and A. Varshney. 2011. Saliency-assisted navigation of very large landscape images. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (2011), 1737--1746. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Robert S Kennedy, Norman E Lane, Kevin S Berbaum, and Michael G Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Eugenia M Kolasinski. 1995. Simulator Sickness in Virtual Environments. Technical Report. DTIC Document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Johannes Kopf, Billy Chen, Richard Szeliski, and Michael Cohen. 2010. Street Slide: Browsing Street Level Imagery. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Papers (SIGGRAPH '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 96, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Johannes Kopf, Matt Uyttendaele, Oliver Deussen, and Michael F. Cohen. 2007. Capturing and Viewing Gigapixel Images. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Papers (SIGGRAPH '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Qing Luan, Steven M Drucker, Johannes Kopf, Ying-Qing Xu, and Michael F Cohen. 2008. Annotating gigapixel images. In Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 33--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sylvain Malacria, Eric Lecolinet, and Yves Guiard. 2010. Clutch-free Panning and Integrated Pan-zoom Control on Touch-sensitive Surfaces: The Cyclostar Approach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2615--2624. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Leonard McMillan and Gary Bishop. 1995. Plenoptic modeling: An image-based rendering system. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, 39--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mathieu Nancel, Julie Wagner, Emmanuel Pietriga, Olivier Chapuis, and Wendy Mackay. 2011. Mid-air Pan-and-zoom on Wall-sized Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 177--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Oculus. 2016. Simulator Sickness in Oculus Best Practice. https: //developer3.oculus.com/documentation/intro-vr/ latest/concepts/bp_app_simulator_sickness/. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Emilee Patrick, Dennis Cosgrove, Aleksandra Slavkovic, Jennifer A Rode, Thom Verratti, and Greg Chiselko. 2000. Using a large projection screen as an alternative to head-mounted displays for virtual environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 478--485. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kaloian Petkov, Charilaos Papadopoulos, and Arie E Kaufman. 2013. Visual exploration of the infinite canvas. In Virtual Reality (VR), 2013 IEEE. IEEE, 11--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Emmanuel Pietriga and Caroline Appert. 2008. Sigma lenses: focus-context transitions combining space, time and translucence. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1343--1352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. JD Prothero and HG Hoffman. 1995. Widening the field-of-view increases the sense of presence in immersive virtual environments. Human Interface Technology Laboratory Technical Report TR-95 2 (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sarah Sharples, Sue Cobb, Amanda Moody, and John R Wilson. 2008. Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays 29, 2 (2008), 58--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kay M Stanney, Robert S Kennedy, and Julie M Drexler. 1997. Cybersickness is not simulator sickness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting, Vol. 41. SAGE Publications, 1138--1142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Thomas A Stoffregen, Mark H Draper, Robert S Kennedy, and Daniel Compton. 2002. Vestibular adaptation and aftereffects. Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications (2002), 773--790.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Luc Vincent. 2007. Taking online maps down to street level. Computer 40, 12 (2007), 118--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. DM Whittinghill, Bradley Ziegler, T Case, and B Moore. 2015. Nasum Virtualis: A Simple Technique for Reducing Simulator Sickness. In Games Developers Conference (GDC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wikipedia. 2010. Gigapan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigapan. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Panning and Zooming High-Resolution Panoramas in Virtual Reality Devices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '17: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
      October 2017
      870 pages
      ISBN:9781450349819
      DOI:10.1145/3126594

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 October 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '17 Paper Acceptance Rate73of324submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader