skip to main content
10.1145/3127502.3127514acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Smart and Very Distant Objects

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This work addresses the feasibility of extreme long distance links based on LoRa technology. We developed a specialized low-cost and highly sensitive hardware based on the LoRa chipset and deployed it in a 316km long link. Received signal strength, signal to noise ratio, and packet reception rate were measured at two different frequency bands: 434MHz and 868MHz. Results clearly show that the link is feasible at both frequencies even with omni directional antennas. In addition, we provide details on the planning of the experiments, as well as procedure employed to find the suitable test bed for such a long distance link. These types of wireless systems are quite useful for disaster mitigation applications in sparsely populated areas.

References

  1. Aloys Augustin, Jiazi Yi, Thomas Clausen, and William Mark Townsley. 2016. A Study of LoRa: Long Range and Low Power Networks for the Internet of Things. Sensors 16, 9 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Martin Bor, John Edward Vidler, and Roedig. 2016. LoRa for the Internet of Things. In Proc. 2016 Int. Conf. Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks. Graz, Austria, 361--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alexandros-Apostolos A. Boulogeorgos, Panagiotis D. Diamantoulakis, and George K. Karagiannidis. 2016. Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWANs) for Internet of Things (IoT) Applications: Research Challenges and Future Trends. CoRR abs/1611.07449 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07449Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ETSI 2011. ETSI TR 103 055 version 1.1.1. (2011). Retrieved July 13, 2017 from http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/103000_103099/103055/01.01.01_60/tr_103055v010101p.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. LoRa Alliance 2016. LoRa Alliance. (2016). Retrieved July 13, 2017 from https://www.lora-alliance.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrea Zanella Marco Centenaro, Lorenzo Vangelista. 2016. Long-Range Communications in Unlicensed Bands: the Rising Stars in the IoT and Smart City Scenarios. IEEE Wireless Communications 23, 5 (2016), 60--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Amy Nordrum. 2016. The internet of fewer things {News}. IEEE Spectrum 53, 10 (2016), 12--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N.S.Miazi et al. 2016. The Internet of Things in Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. In proceedings of 5th International Conference on Informatics, Electronics and Vision (ICIEV) special session on Mobile Sensing. Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Juha Petajajarvi, Konstantin Mikhaylov, Antti Roivainen, Tuomo Hanninen, and Marko Pettissalo. 2015. On the coverage of LPWANs: range evaluation and channel attenuation model for LoRa technology. In ITS Telecommunications (ITST), 2015 14th International Conference on. IEEE, 55--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Juha Petajajarvi, Konstantin Mikhaylov, Marko Pettissalo, Janne Janhunen, and Jari Iinatti. 2017. Performance of a low-power wide-area network based on LoRa technology: Doppler robustness, scalability, and coverage. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 13, 3 (2017), 1550147717699412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Thomas Noel Pierre Neumann, Julien Montavont. 2016. Indoor deployment of low-power wide area networks (LPWAN): A LoRaWAN case study. In IEEE 12th Int. Conf. on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Commun. (WiMob).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ermanno Pietrosemoli, Marco Zennaro, and Carlo Fonda. 2012. Low cost carrier independent telecommunications infrastructure. In Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS), 2012. IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ramon Sanchez-Iborra and Maria-Dolores Cano. 2016. State of the Art in LP-WAN Solutions for Industrial IoT Services. Sensors 16, 5 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Semtech 2016. LoRa. (2016). Retrieved July 13, 2017 from http://www.semtech.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Semtech datasheet 2016. SX1276/77/78/79 - 137 MHz to 1020 MHz low power long range transceiver. (2016). Retrieved July 13, 2017 from http://www.semtech.com/images/datasheet/sx1276.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. The Things Network 2016. The Things Network. (2016). Retrieved July 13, 2017 from https://www.thethingsnetwork.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Geoffrey Werner-Allen, Konrad Lorincz, Mario Ruiz, Omar Marcillo, Jeff Johnson, Jonathan Lees, and Matt Welsh. 2006. Deploying a wireless sensor network on an active volcano. IEEE internet computing 10, 2 (2006), 18--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Marco Zennaro, Marco Rainone, and Ermanno Pietrosemoli. 2016. Radio Link Planning made easy with a Telegram Bot. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.09248 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Smart and Very Distant Objects

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SMARTOBJECTS '17: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Experiences with the Design and Implementation of Smart Objects
        October 2017
        62 pages
        ISBN:9781450351416
        DOI:10.1145/3127502

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 October 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SMARTOBJECTS '17 Paper Acceptance Rate4of12submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate15of41submissions,37%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader