skip to main content
10.1145/3127540.3127559acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

INDIGO: Interest-Driven Data Dissemination Framework for Mobile Networks

Published:21 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present INDIGO, an interest-driven data dissemination framework that enables to predict the performance of data dissemination. INDIGO computes a tight upper bound of data dissemination time under (i) heterogeneous mobility patterns of people and, (ii) interests-driven dissemination strategy. INDIGO automatically learns the interests of people from their browsing history and also captures their heterogeneous mobility patterns.

We model data dissemination with a cut-off point based approach that mimics real-world data process by utilizing the long tail behavior of inter-contact time distribution. We validate INDIGO through our real-world traces and achieve a tight upper bound of data dissemination, within 2-18% of error. We further identify a long tail behavior of users' interest distribution, and use this finding to validate the scalability on large traces with synthetic interest.

INDIGO can empower local businesses or publishers to assess the performance of their localized dissemination based services in advance and with high accuracy.

References

  1. Chiara Boldrini, Marco Conti, and Andrea Passarella. 2014. Performance modelling of opportunistic forwarding under heterogenous mobility. Computer Communications 48 (2014), 56--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Juan Miguel Carrascosa, Jakub Mikians, Ruben Cuevas, Vijay Erramilli, and Nikolaos Laoutaris. 2014. I Always Feel Like Somebody's Watching Me. Measuring Online Behavioural Advertising. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.5281 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Radu-Ioan Ciobanu, Radu-Corneliu Marin, Ciprian Dobre, and Valentin Cristea. 2015. Interest-awareness in data dissemination for opportunistic networks. Ad Hoc Networks 25 (2015), 330--345. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Andrea Clementi, Riccardo Silvestri, and Luca Trevisan. 2012. Information Spreading in Dynamic Graphs. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 37--46. https://doi.org/10.1145/2332432.2332439 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Vania Conan, Jérémie Leguay, and Timur Friedman. 2006. The heterogeneity of inter-contact time distributions: its importance for routing in delay tolerant networks. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nathan Eagle, Alex Sandy Pentland, and David Lazer. 2009. Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 36 (2009), 15274--15278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Foerster, K. Garg, H. A. Nguyen, and S. Giordano. 2012. On Context Awareness and Social Distance in Human Mobility Traces. In 3rd International Workshop on Mobile Opportunistic Networks. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kamini Garg and Silvia Giordano. 2015. Towards developing a generalized modeling framework for data dissemination. ewsn 2015 (2015), 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Google. 2015. Understanding Consumer's Local Search Behavior. https://storage.googleapis.com/think-emea/docs/research study/Report Google Local Search Behavior DE 1.pdf. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Robin Groenevelt, Philippe Nain, and Ger Koole. 2005. The Message Delay in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Perform. Eval. 62, 1--4 (Oct. 2005), 210--228. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.peva.2005.07.018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. W-J Hsu, Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos, Konstantinos Psounis, and Ahmed Helmy. 2007. Modeling time-variant user mobility in wireless mobile networks. In IEEE INFOCOM 2007--26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 758--766.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Thomas Karagiannis, Jean-Yves Le Boudec, and Milan Vojnovic. 2007. Power Law and Exponential Decay of Inter Contact Times Between Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183--194. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1287853.1287875 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Vincent Lenders, Jorg Wagner, and Martin May. 2006. Measurements from an 802.11B Mobile Ad Hoc Network. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on on World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WOWMOM '06). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 519--524. https://doi.org/10. 1109/WOWMOM.2006.63Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Alessandro Mei, Giacomo Morabito, Paolo Santi, and Julinda Stefa. 2011. Social-aware stateless forwarding in pocket switched networks. In Infocom, 2011 Proceedings Ieee. IEEE, 251--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Damon Mosk-Aoyama and Devavrat Shah. 2008. Fast distributed algorithms for computing separable functions. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on 54, 7 (2008), 2997--3007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Picu, Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos, and T. Hossmann. 2012. An analysis of the information spreading delay in heterogeneous mobility DTNs. In World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), 2012 IEEE International Symposium on a. 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1109/WoWMoM.2012.6263682Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. James Scott, Richard Gass, Jon Crowcroft, Pan Hui, Christophe Diot, and Augustin Chaintreau. 2006. CRAWDAD data set cambridge/haggle (v. 2006-01--31). Downloaded from http://crawdad.org/cambridge/haggle/. (Jan. 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Amin Vahdat, David Becker, et al. 2000. Epidemic routing for partially connected ad hoc networks. (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. John Whitbeck, Marcelo Amorim, Yoann Lopez, Jeremie Leguay, and Vania Conan. 2011. Relieving the wireless infrastructure: When opportunistic networks meet guaranteed delays. In World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a. IEEE, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Eiko Yoneki. 2011. FluPhone Study: Virtual Disease Spread Using Haggle. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Workshop on Challenged Networks (CHANTS '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 65--66. https://doi.org/10.1145/2030652.2030672 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. INDIGO: Interest-Driven Data Dissemination Framework for Mobile Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MSWiM '17: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems
      November 2017
      340 pages
      ISBN:9781450351621
      DOI:10.1145/3127540

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 November 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MSWiM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate29of142submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader