skip to main content
10.1145/3130859.3131339acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Magia Transformo: Designing for Mixed Reality Transformative Play

Published:15 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This work-in-progress paper presents a first look at Magia Transformo: a mixed reality game for transformative play. Drawing on techniques of backleading and outside->in transformation from theater practice, Magia Transformo uses costumes, props, sets, narration, and physical enactment to transform the bodies and environment of its players. We argue that these design techniques, although still in their early development, can broadly inform the work of designers and scholars seeking to create experiences of character identification and transformation in games.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

chipwp0210-file3.mp4

mp4

22.9 MB

References

  1. Kaho Abe and Katherine Isbister. 2016. Hotaru: The Lightning Bug Game. 277--280. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2889472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hajo Adam and Adam D. Galinsky. 2012. Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48, 4: 918--925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Antifakos and B. Schiele. 2002. Bridging the gap between virtual and physical games using wearable sensors. In Proceedings. Sixth International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 139--140. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2002.1167233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sasha A. Barab, Melissa Gresalfi, Anna Arici, Patrick Pettyjohn, and Adam Ingram-Goble. 2010. Transformative Play: Games As 21st Century Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 2 (ICLS '10), 93--100. Retrieved October 25, 2014 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1854509.185454Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sasha A. Barab, Melissa Gresalfi, and Adam Ingram-Goble. 2010. Transformational Play Using Games to Position Person, Content, and Context. Educational Researcher 39, 7: 525--536. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10386593 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Robert Benedetti. 1997. The Actor At Work. Allyn and Bacon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlos Borrego, Cristina Fernández, Ian Blanes, and Sergi Robles. 2017. Room escape at class: Escape games activities to facilitate the motivation and learning in computer science. Journal of Technology and Science Education 7, 2: 162--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Erving Goffman. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. The Free Press, Toronto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. A. Heinz, K. S. Kunze, M. Gruber, D. Bannach, and P. Lukowicz. 2006. Using Wearable Sensors for Real-Time Recognition Tasks in Games of Martial Arts - An Initial Experiment. In 2006 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games, 98--102. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2006.311687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Steve Hinske, Matthias Lampe, Carsten Magerkurth, and Carsten Röcker. 2007. Classifying pervasive games: on pervasive computing and mixed reality. Concepts and technologies for Pervasive Games-A Reader for Pervasive Gaming Research 1, 20. Retrieved April 13, 2017 from http://www.coulthard.com/library/Files/hinske_2007_classifyingpervasivegames.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Katherine Isbister, Kaho Abe, and Michael Karlesky. 2017. Interdependent Wearables (for Play): A Strong Concept for Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 465--471. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025939Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bernhard Jung, Andreas Schrader, and Darren V. Carlson. 2005. Tangible Interfaces for Pervasive Gaming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tomaz Kolar. 2017. Conceptualising tourist experiences with new attractions: the case of escape rooms. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 29, 5. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/I JCHM-12--2015-0687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Miriam Konkel, Vivian Leung, Brygg Ullmer, and Catherine Hu. 2004. Tagaboo: A Collaborative Children's Game Based Upon Wearable RFID Technology. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8, 5: 382--384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-0040302-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. David Krasner. 2000. I Hate Strasberg: Method Bashing in the Academy. In Method Acting Reconsidered, David Krasner (ed.). St. Martin's Press, New York, NY, 3--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Carsten Magerkurth, Adrian David Cheok, Regan L. Mandryk, and Trond Nilsen. 2005. Pervasive Games: Bringing Computer Entertainment Back to the Real World. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3: 4--4. https://doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077257Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ali Mazalek, Glorianna Davenport, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2002. Tangible Viewpoints: A Physical Approach to Multimedia Stories. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Markus Montola, Jaakko Stenros, and Annika Waern. 2009. Pervasive Games: Theory and Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Janet Murray. 1997. Hamlet on the Holodeck: the future of narrative in cyberspace. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Niantic. 2016. Pokémon Go. Niantic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Scott Nicholson. 2015. Peeking behind the locked door: A survey of escape room facilities. White Paper available at http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/erfacwhite.pdf. Retrieved from http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/erfacwhite.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yuichi Ohta and Hideyuki Tamura. 2014. Mixed Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Isabel Pedersen. 2013. Ready to Wear: A Rhetoric of Wearable Computers and Reality-Shifting Media. Parlor Press. Retrieved January 13, 2016 from http://www.decimallab.ca/wpcontent/uploads/2015/01/PedersenChapter1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Murray Smith. 1995. Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema. Clarendon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Constantin Stanislavski. 1936. An Actor Prepares. Theater Arts Inc, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Constantin Stanislavski. 2013. Building a Character. A&C Black.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Theresa Jean Tanenbaum. 2015. Identity Transformation and Agency in Digital Narratives and Story Based Games. Simon Fraser University, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada. Retrieved from http://summit.sfu.ca/item/15285Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, Nicole Crenshaw, and Karen Tanenbaum. 2016. "It's a Me, Mario!": Costumed Gaming's Effects on Character Identification. In Abstract Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference of DiGRA and FDG. Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digitallibrary/paper_407.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Theresa Jean Tanenbaum and Karen Tanenbaum. 2015. Empathy and Identity in Digital Games: Towards a New Theory of Transformative Play. In Foundations of Digital Games, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.fdg2015.org/papers/fdg2015_paper_49.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Theresa Jean Tanenbaum and Karen Tanenbaum. 2015. Envisioning the Future of Wearable Play: Conceptual Models for Props and Costumes as Game Controllers. In Foundations of Digital Games, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.fdg2015.org/papers/fdg2015_paper_55.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Bruce H. Thomas. 2012. A Survey of Visual, Mixed, and Augmented Reality Gaming. Comput. Entertain. 10, 1: 3:1--3:33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2381876.2381879Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Tomorrow Corporation. 2012. Little Inferno. In (Windows PC [Steam]). Tomorrow Corporation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. C. Ulbricht and D. Schmalstieg. 2003. Tangible Augmented Reality for Computer Games. Retrieved May 22, 2014 from http://www.actapress.com.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/Abstract.aspx?paperId=14453Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Brygg Ullmer and Hiroshi Ishii. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits, and Atoms. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Markus Wiemker, Errol Elumir, and Adam Clare. 2015. Escape Room Games. Game Based Learning: 55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Amanda Williams, Lynn Hughes, and Bart Simon. 2010. Propinquity: Exploring Embodied Gameplay. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference Adjunct Papers on Ubiquitous Computing - Adjunct (UbiComp '10 Adjunct), 387--388. https://doi.org/10.1145/1864431.1864449Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jeff Wirth. 1994. Interactive Acting: Acting, Improvisation, and Interacting for Audience Participatory Theatre. Fall Creek Press, Fall Creek, OR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Magia Transformo: Designing for Mixed Reality Transformative Play

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI PLAY '17 Extended Abstracts: Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 2017
      700 pages
      ISBN:9781450351119
      DOI:10.1145/3130859

      Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI PLAY '17 Extended Abstracts Paper Acceptance Rate46of178submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader