skip to main content
10.1145/3132847.3132961acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Representation Learning of Large-Scale Knowledge Graphs via Entity Feature Combinations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Knowledge graphs are typical large-scale multi-relational structures, which comprise a large amount of fact triplets. Nonetheless, existing knowledge graphs are still sparse and far from being complete. To refine the knowledge graphs, representation learning is widely used to embed fact triplets into low-dimensional spaces. Many existing knowledge graph embedding models either focus on learning rich features from entities but fail to extract good features of relations, or employ sophisticated models that have rather high time and memory-space complexities. In this paper, we propose a novel knowledge graph embedding model, CombinE. It exploits entity features from two complementary perspectives via the plus and minus combinations. We start with the plus combination, where we use shared features of entity pairs participating in a relation to convey its relation features. To also allow differences of each pairs of entities participating in a relation, we also use the minus combination, where we concentrate on individual entity features, and regard relations as a channel to offset the divergence and preserve the prominence between head and tail entities. Compared with the state-of-the-art models, our experimental results demonstrate that CombinE outperforms existing ones and has low time and memory-space complexities.

References

  1. A. Bordes, J. Weston, R. Collobert, and Y. Bengio. Learning structured embeddings of knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, California, USA, August 7--11, 2011, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. Bordes, X. Glorot, J. Weston, and Y. Bengio. Joint learning of words and meaning representations for open-text semantic parsing. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, La Palma, Canary Islands, April 21--23, 2012, pages 127--135, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. -Durán, Weston, and Yakhnenko}DBLP:conf/nips/BordesUGWY13A. Bordes, N. Usunier, A. García-Durán, J. Weston, and O. Yakhnenko. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2013. Proceedings of a meeting held December 5--8, 2013, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States., pages 2787--2795, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Bordes, X. Glorot, J. Weston, and Y. Bengio. A semantic matching energy function for learning with multi-relational data - application to word-sense disambiguation. Machine Learning, 94 (2): 233--259, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Chapados, Y. Bengio, P. Vincent, J. Ghosn, C. Dugas, I. Takeuchi, and L. Meng. Estimating car insurance premia: a case study in high-dimensional data inference. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14 {Neural Information Processing Systems: Natural and Synthetic, December 3--8, 2001, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada}, pages 1369--1376, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. X. Dong, E. Gabrilovich, G. Heitz, W. Horn, N. Lao, K. Murphy, T. Strohmann, S. Sun, and W. Zhang. Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion. In The 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA - August 24 - 27, 2014, pages 601--610, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Feng, M. Huang, M. Wang, M. Zhou, Y. Hao, and X. Zhu. Knowledge graph embedding by flexible translation. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, April 25--29, 2016., pages 557--560, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Franz, A. Schultz, S. Sizov, and S. Staab. Triplerank: Ranking semantic web data by tensor decomposition. In The Semantic Web - ISWC 2009, 8th International Semantic Web Conference, Chantilly, VA, USA, October 25--29, 2009. Proceedings, pages 213--228, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. X. Glorot, A. Bordes, and Y. Bengio. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Fort Lauderdale, USA, April 11--13, 2011, pages 315--323, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Jenatton, N. L. Roux, A. Bordes, and G. Obozinski. A latent factor model for highly multi-relational data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25: 26th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2012. Proceedings of a meeting held December 3--6, 2012, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States., pages 3176--3184, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Ji, S. He, L. Xu, K. Liu, and J. Zhao. Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, July 26--31, 2015, Beijing, China, Volume 1: Long Papers, pages 687--696, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Y. Jia, Y. Wang, H. Lin, X. Jin, and X. Cheng. Locally adaptive translation for knowledge graph embedding. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, February 12--17, 2016, Phoenix, Arizona, USA., pages 992--998, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. Kemp, J. B. Tenenbaum, T. L. Griffiths, T. Yamada, and N. Ueda. Learning systems of concepts with an infinite relational model. In Proceedings, The Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Eighteenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, July 16--20, 2006, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, pages 381--388, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Sun, Y. Liu, and X. Zhu. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, January 25--30, 2015, Austin, Texas, USA., pages 2181--2187, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Nickel, V. Tresp, and H. Kriegel. A three-way model for collective learning on multi-relational data. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bellevue, Washington, USA, June 28 - July 2, 2011, pages 809--816, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Nickel, L. Rosasco, and T. A. Poggio. Holographic embeddings of knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, February 12--17, 2016, Phoenix, Arizona, USA., pages 1955--1961, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Richardson and P. M. Domingos. Markov logic networks. Machine Learning, 62 (1--2): 107--136, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. Singla and P. M. Domingos. Entity resolution with markov logic. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 18--22 December 2006, Hong Kong, China, pages 572--582, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. Socher, D. Chen, C. D. Manning, and A. Y. Ng. Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2013. Proceedings of a meeting held December 5--8, 2013, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States., pages 926--934, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Sun, D. Tao, and C. Faloutsos. Beyond streams and graphs: dynamic tensor analysis. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Philadelphia, PA, USA, August 20--23, 2006, pages 374--383, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. I. Sutskever, R. Salakhutdinov, and J. B. Tenenbaum. Modelling relational data using bayesian clustered tensor factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22: 23rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2009. Proceedings of a meeting held 7--10 December 2009, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada., pages 1821--1828, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. T. Trouillon, J. Welbl, S. Riedel, É. Gaussier, and G. Bouchard. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction. In Proceedings of the 33nd International Conference on Machine Learning, New York City, NY, USA, June 19--24, 2016, pages 2071--2080, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Z. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Feng, and Z. Chen. Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July 27-31, 2014, Québec City, Québec, Canada., pages 1112--1119, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. R. Xie, Z. Liu, J. Jia, H. Luan, and M. Sun. Representation learning of knowledge graphs with entity descriptions. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, February 12--17, 2016, Phoenix, Arizona, USA., pages 2659--2665, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. B. Yang, W. Yih, X. He, J. Gao, and L. Deng. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. CoRR, abs/1412.6575, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. D. Zeiler. ADADELTA: an adaptive learning rate method. CoRR, abs/1212.5701, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Representation Learning of Large-Scale Knowledge Graphs via Entity Feature Combinations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      November 2017
      2604 pages
      ISBN:9781450349185
      DOI:10.1145/3132847

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 November 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate171of855submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader