skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Can Biosignals be Expressive?: How Visualizations Affect Impression Formation from Shared Brain Activity

Published:06 December 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We are exploring the concept of expressive biosignals: leveraging wearable technologies to introduce sensed physiological data as cues for social perception. Biosignals can help us achieve a deeper understanding of each other by revealing or clarifying the psychological processes that underlie our subjective experience. We conducted an exploratory study investigating expressive biosignals, comparing the influence of a variety of brain activity visualizations on impression formation. Results revealed that while participants readily infer emotional and cognitive states from visualized brain activity, the ambiguity of the data can lead to diverse perceptions and interpretations. Participants also expressed concerns that the observation of another individual's data during interaction might be invasive or distracting. We present a set of design considerations addressing issues of interpretability, integration, and privacy of biosignals in interpersonal contexts.

References

  1. Maher Abujelala, Cheryl Abellanoza, Aayush Sharma, and Fillia Makedon.2016. Brain-ee: Brain enjoyment evaluation using commercial eeg headband Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. ACM, 33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gordon W Allport.1933. Studies in Expressive Movement. The Macmillan Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal.1992. Thin Slices of Expressive Behavior as Predictors of Interpersonal Consequences: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin Vol. 111, 2 (1992), 256--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Yadid Ayzenberg, Javier Hernandez Rivera, and Rosalind Picard.2012. FEEL: frequent EDA and event logging--a mobile social interaction stress monitoring system Proceedings of the CHI 2012 Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2357--2362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fabio Babiloni and Laura Astolfi.2014. Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: past, present and future. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews Vol. 44 (2014), 76--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Pouya Bashivan, Irina Rish, and Steve Heisig.2015. Mental State Recognition via Wearable EEG. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chris Berka, Daniel J Levendowski, Milenko M Cvetinovic, Miroslav M Petrovic, Gene Davis, Michelle N Lumicao, Vladimir T Zivkovic, Miodrag V Popovic, and Richard Olmstead.2004. Real-time analysis of EEG indexes of alertness, cognition, and memory acquired with a wireless EEG headset. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 17, 2 (2004), 151--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Franco Curmi, Maria Angela Ferrario, Jen Southern, and Jon Whittle.2013. HeartLink: open broadcast of live biometric data to social networks Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1749--1758. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bella M DePaulo.1992. Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin Vol. 111, 2 (1992), 203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Empatica.2017. Monitor stress, seizures, activity, sleep. (2017). Retrieved April 24, 2017 from https://www.empatica.com/product-embrace.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jérémy Frey.2016. Remote Heart Rate Sensing and Projection to Renew Traditional Board Games and Foster Social Interactions. In Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1865--1871. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Laurent George and Anatole Lécuyer.2010. An overview of research on "passive" brain-computer interfaces for implicit human-computer interaction. In International Conference on Applied Bionics and Biomechanics ICABB 2010-Workshop W1 "Brain-Computer Interfacing and Virtual Reality".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Robert Gifford.1994. A lens-mapping framework for understanding the encoding and decoding of interpersonal dispositions in nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 66, 2 (1994), 398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Daniel T Gilbert, Brett W Pelham, and Douglas S Krull.1988. On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 54, 5 (1988), 733.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Erving Goffman.1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor, Garden City, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Samuel D Gosling, Peter J Rentfrow, and William B Swann.2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality Vol. 37, 6 (2003), 504--528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mariam Hassib, Daniel Buschek, PawelW W Wozniak, and Florian Alt.2017 a. HeartChat: Heart Rate Augmented Mobile Chat to Support Empathy and Awareness Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2239--2251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mariam Hassib, Stefan Schneegass, Philipp Eiglsperger, Niels Henze, Albrecht Schmidt, and Florian Alt.2017 b. EngageMeter: A System for Implicit Audience Engagement Sensing Using Electroencephalography Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5114--5119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Javier Hernandez, Ivan Riobo, Agata Rozga, Gregory D Abowd, and Rosalind W Picard.2014. Using electrodermal activity to recognize ease of engagement in children during social interactions. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 307--317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Noura Howell, Laura Devendorf, Rundong Kevin Tian, Tomás Vega Galvez, Nan-Wei Gong, Ivan Poupyrev, Eric Paulos, and Kimiko Ryokai.2016. Biosignals as Social Cues: Ambiguity and Emotional Interpretation in Social Displays of Skin Conductance. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 865--870. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Interaxon.2015. Available Data - Muse Developers. (2015). Retrieved November 11, 2016 from http://developer.choosemuse.com/research-tools/available-dataGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Joris H Janssen, Jeremy N Bailenson, Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, and Joyce HDM Westerink.2010. Intimate heartbeats: Opportunities for affective communication technology. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing Vol. 1, 2 (2010), 72--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Markus Koppensteiner and Karl Grammer.2010. Motion patterns in political speech and their influence on personality ratings. Journal of Research in Personality Vol. 44, 3 (2010), 374--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Megan N Kozak, Abigail A Marsh, and Daniel M Wegner.2006. What do I think you're doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 90, 4 (2006), 543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Sylvia D Kreibig.2010. Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology Vol. 84, 3 (2010), 394--421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Erik Andreas Larsen.2011. Classification of EEG signals in a brain-computer interface system. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucian Leahu and Phoebe Sengers.2014. Freaky: performing hybrid human-machine emotion. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 607--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Robert W Levenson and Anna M Ruef.1997. Physiological aspects of emotional knowledge and rapport. Empathic Accuracy, bibfieldeditorWilliam J Ickes (Ed.). Guilford Press, Chapter 2, 44--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rashima Mahajan, Dipali Bansal, and Shweta Singh.2014. A Real Time Set Up for Retrieval of Emotional States from Human Neural Responses. International Journal of Medical, Health, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 8, 3 (2014), 142--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Banu Manav.2007. Color-emotion associations and color preferences: A case study for residences. Color Research & Application Vol. 32, 2 (2007), 144--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jennifer Mankoff, Anind K Dey, Gary Hsieh, Julie Kientz, Scott Lederer, and Morgan Ames.2003. Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 169--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Gerald Matthews and Manfred Amelang.1993. Extraversion, arousal theory and performance: A study of individual differences in the EEG. Personality and Individual Differences Vol. 14, 2 (1993), 347--363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Nick Merrill and Coye Cheshire.2016. Habits of the Heart (rate): Social Interpretation of Biosignals in Two Interaction Contexts Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, 31--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Nick Merrill and Coye Cheshire.2017. Trust Your Heart: Assessing Cooperation and Trust with Biosignals in Computer-Mediated Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 2--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Crysta Metcalf, Gunnar Harboe, Joe Tullio, Noel Massey, Guy Romano, Elaine M Huang, and Frank Bentley.2008. Examining presence and lightweight messaging in a social television experience. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), Vol. 4, 4 (2008), 27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Hyeryung Christine Min and Tek-Jin Nam.2014. Biosignal sharing for affective connectedness. In Proceedings of the CHI 2014 Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2191--2196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Helmuth Petsche, K Linder, Peter Rappelsberger, and Gerold Gruber.1988. The EEG: An adequate method to concretize brain processes elicited by music. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 6, 2 (1988), 133--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Ronald E Riggio and Howard S Friedman.1986. Impression formation: the role of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, 2 (1986), 421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Louis A Schmidt and Laurel J Trainor.2001. Frontal brain electrical activity (EEG) distinguishes valence and intensity of musical emotions. Cognition & Emotion, Vol. 15, 4 (2001), 487--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Holger Schn"adelbach, Stefan Rennick Egglestone, Stuart Reeves, Steve Benford, Brendan Walker, and Michael Wright.2008. Performing thrill: designing telemetry systems and spectator interfaces for amusement rides Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1167--1176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Mark S Schwartz and Frank Andrasik.2015. Biofeedback: A Practitioner's Guide. Guilford Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Petr Slovák, Joris Janssen, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick.2012. Understanding heart rate sharing: towards unpacking physiosocial space Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 859--868. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Jaime Snyder, Mark Matthews, Jacqueline Chien, Pamara F Chang, Emily Sun, Saeed Abdullah, and Geri Gay.2015. Moodlight: Exploring personal and social implications of ambient display of biosensor data. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 143--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. A Strauss and J Corbin.1998. Basics of qualitative research techniques. (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Chiew Seng Sean Tan, Johannes Schöning, Kris Luyten, and Karin Coninx.2014. Investigating the effects of using biofeedback as visual stress indicator during video-mediated collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Martin Tanis and Tom Postmes.2003. Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication Vol. 53, 4 (2003), 676--693.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Kristin Taraldsen, Sebastien FM Chastin, Ingrid I Riphagen, Beatrix Vereijken, and Jorunn L Helbostad.2012. Physical activity monitoring by use of accelerometer-based body-worn sensors in older adults: a systematic literature review of current knowledge and applications. Maturitas, Vol. 71, 1 (2012), 13--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Wouter Walmink, Danielle Wilde, and Florian'Floyd' Mueller.2014. Displaying heart rate data on a bicycle helmet to support social exertion experiences Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 97--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Julia Werner, Reto Wettach, and Eva Hornecker.2008. United-pulse: feeling your partner's pulse. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 535--538. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Amanda L Wheat and Kevin T Larkin.2010. Biofeedback of heart rate variability and related physiology: A critical review. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Vol. 35, 3 (2010), 229--242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Michele A Williams, Asta Roseway, Chris O'Dowd, Mary Czerwinski, and Meredith Ringel Morris.2015. Swarm: an actuated wearable for mediating affect. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 293--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Can Biosignals be Expressive?: How Visualizations Affect Impression Formation from Shared Brain Activity

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 1, Issue CSCW
        November 2017
        2095 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3171581
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 December 2017
        Published in pacmhci Volume 1, Issue CSCW

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader