Helena M. Mentis
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
In surgery, assemblages of imaging systems need to be managed, interfaced, and coordinated by a collocated team. In this paper, I untangle the different forms of imaging system interaction in this highly specialized multi-device environment (MDE). I show how the different forms of imaging systems affect the work practice by creating a need for additional articulation work. This articulation work is coordinated into the surgical practice on the body by either distributing the work across the team or by requiring a momentary pause of the surgical work for the entire team to attend to the articulation work to be done on or with the images. And we see how distributing the work across the team still requires a reintegration of the knowledge gleaned from the new information into the surgery itself. This presents an expansion of our understanding of how collocated teams function in MDEs that consist of purely shared displays.
- Herbert H. Clark and Susan E. Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on socially shared cognition, L.B. Resnick, J. Levine and S.D. Teasley (eds.). APA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Andy Crabtree, Peter Tolmie, and Mark Rouncefield. 2013. "How Many Bloody Examples Do You Want?" Fieldwork and Generalisation. In ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21-25 September 2013, Paphos, Cyprus. Springer London, London, 1--20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yuanyuan Feng and Helena M Mentis. 2016. Supporting Common Ground Development in the Operation Room through Information Display Systems. AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium 2016: 1774--1783. Retrieved July 9, 2017 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28269936Google Scholar
- Yuanyuan Feng, Christopher Wong, Adrian Park, and Helena Mentis. 2016. Taxonomy of instructions given to residents in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 30, 3: 1073--1077.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, Tom Rodden, Steve Reece, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, and David Jones. 2015. Building a Birds Eye View. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 4103--4112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Charles Goodwin. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers.Google Scholar
- Jonathan Grudin. 2001. Partitioning digital worlds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '01, 458--465. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl Gutwin and Saul Greenberg. The mechanics of collaboration: developing low cost usability evaluation methods for shared workspaces. In Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000), 98--103. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christian Heath, Jon Hindmarsh, and Paul Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Christian Heath and Paul Luff. 2012. Embodied Action and Organizational Activity. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 281--307.Google Scholar
- Alexa Hepburn and Galina B. Bolden. 2012. The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 57--76.Google Scholar
- Jan Hess, Benedikt Ley, Corinna Ogonowski, Lin Wan, and Volker Wulf. 2011. Jumping between devices and services. In Proceddings of the 9th international interactive conference on Interactive television - EuroITV '11, 11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jon Hindmarsh and Alison Pilnick. 2002. The Tacit Order of Teamwork: Collaboration and Embodied Conduct in Anesthesia. The Sociological Quarterly 43, 2: 139--164.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jon Hindmarsh and Alison Pilnick. 2007. Knowing Bodies at Work: Embodiment and Ephemeral Teamwork in Anaesthesia. Organization Studies 28, 9: 1395--1416.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stefan Hirschauer. 1991. The Manufacture of Bodies in Surgery. Social Studies of Science 21, 2: 279--319.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rose Johnson, Kenton O'Hara, Abigail Sellen, Claire Cousins, and Antonio Criminisi. 2011. Exploring the potential for touchless interaction in image-guided interventional radiology. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '11, 3323. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul McKay. 2009. Design of collaborative systems for modern cockpits. University of Waterloo, Waterloo.Google Scholar
- Helena M. Mentis, Amine Chellali, and Steven Schwaitzberg. 2014. Learning to See the Body?: Supporting Instruction al Practices in Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2113--2122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helena M. Mentis, Kenton O'Hara, Abigail Sellen, and Rikin Trivedi. 2012. Interaction proxemics and image use in neurosurgery. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12, 927. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helena M. Mentis and Alex S. Taylor. 2013. Imaging the body. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13, 1479. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miguel A. Nacenta, Carl Gutwin, Dzmitry Aliakseyeu, and Sriram Subramanian. 2009. There and Back Again: Cross-Display Object Movement in Multi-Display Environments. Human-Computer Interaction 24, 1-2: 170--229.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kenton O'Hara, Neville Dastur, Tom Carrell, et al. 2014. Touchless interaction in surgery. Communications of the ACM 57, 1: 70--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kenton O'Hara, Gerardo Gonzalez, Graeme Penney, et al. 2014. Interactional order and constructed ways of seeing with touchless imaging systems in surgery. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal 23, 3: 299--337. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kenton O'Hara, Richard Harper, Helena M. Mentis, Abigail Sellen, and Alex Taylor. 2013. On the naturalness of touchless. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 1: 1--25. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Pinelle, Carl Gutwin, and Saul Greenberg. 2003. Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 10, 4: 281--311. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Rooksby, Timothy E. Smith, Alistair Morrison, Mattias Rost, and Matthew Chalmers. 2015. Configuring Attention in the Multiscreen Living Room. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 243--261.Google Scholar
- Steve Sawyer and Andrea Tapia. 2006. Always Articulating: Theorizing on Mobile and Wireless Technologies. The Information Society 22, 5: 311--323.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kjeld Schmidt. 2002. The Problem with 'Awareness': Introductory Remarks on 'Awareness in CSCW'. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 11, 3-4: 285--298. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kjeld Schmidt. 2008. Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work (1992). Springer London, 45--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stacey D. Scott, Guillaume Besacier, and Phillip J. McClelland. 2014. Cross-device transfer in a collaborative multi-surface environment without user identification. In 2014 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 219--226.Google Scholar
- Stacey D. Scott and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2010. Theory of Tabletop Territoriality. Springer London, 357--385.Google Scholar
- Stacey D. Scott, T.C. Nicholas Graham, James R. Wallace, Mark Hancock, and Miguel Nacenta. 2015. "Local Remote" Collaboration: Applying Remote Group Awareness Techniques to Co-located Settings. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW'15 Companion, 319--324. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Seifried, Michael Haller, Stacey D. Scott, et al. 2009. CRISTAL. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces - ITS '09, 33.Google Scholar
- Anselm Strauss, Shizuko Fagerhaugh, Barbara Suczek, and Carolyn Wiener. 1985. Social organization of medical work. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- John C. Tang. 1991. Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34, 2: 143--160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- James R. Wallace, Stacey D. Scott, Eugene Lai, and Deon Jajalla. 2011. Investigating the Role of a Large, Shared Display in Multi-Display Environments. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 20, 6: 529--561. Google ScholarDigital Library
- James R. Wallace, Stacey D. Scott, Taryn Stutz, Tricia Enns, and Kori Inkpen. 2009. Investigating teamwork and taskwork in single- and multi-display groupware systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 13, 8: 569--581. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Collocated Use of Imaging Systems in Coordinated Surgical Practice
Recommendations
Imaging the body: embodied vision in minimally invasive surgery
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsRecent years have seen the possibilities of new imaging and interaction technologies for minimally invasive surgery such as touchless interaction and high definition renderings of three-dimensional anatomy. With this paper we take a step back to review ...
Collaborative Design-in-use: An Instrumental Genesis Lens in Multi-device Environments
The fast-growing proliferation of multi-device systems has been reshaping the contexts in which collaborative activity takes place. The evolving materialisation of multi-device environments (MDEs) is likely to have an impact on foundational CSCW ...
Rethinking decision making in complex work settings: beyond human cognition to the social landscape
HCI '16: Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Fusion!This paper presents a fusion of ideas across disciplines to study and conceptualize decision making. Typically, decision making is approached as a cognitive process. Nevertheless, there is a growing shift in perception towards decision making as more ...
Comments