skip to main content
10.1145/3136560.3136574acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Findings from a Civil Society Mediated and Technology Assisted Grievance Redressal Model in Rural India

Published:16 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social welfare schemes and public infrastructure services often face implementation and last mile delivery challenges. Governments in India have set up phone helplines for beneficiaries to report irregularities but we find that it remains challenging for beneficiaries to realise positive outcomes through these helplines; without a personal follow-up with the concerned local government officials by experienced members from the civil society, the redressals done are often inadequate. To combine the scalability of centralised helplines with the effectiveness of decentralised mediation by civil society groups, we set up an IVR (Interactive Voice Response) system where beneficiaries can record their grievances, which are then delegated to a network of civil society volunteers who do the required local follow-ups for resolution of these grievances. Through this pilot, we analysed over 200 cases of redressal and document how volunteer networks operate and can plug accountability gaps in government services. We advocate for formalisation of this civil-society mediated and technology assisted model into the design of public welfare schemes to enable citizens to engage with government departments in productive ways.

References

  1. {n. d.}. Bharat Nirman Volunteers. http://ruraldiksha.nic.in/. {n. d.}). Accessed: 14/4/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. {n. d.}. Bihar Public Grievance Redressal System. http://www.bpgrs.in/. ({n. d.}). Accessed: 16/1/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. {n. d.}. Census of India, 2011. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/pca/Searchdata.aspx. ({n. d.}). Accessed: 1/7/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. {n. d.}. Jharkhand CM Helpline. http://jharkhandsamadhan.nic.in/. ({n. d.}). Accessed: 16/1/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. {n. d.}. Madhya Pradesh CM Helpline. http://cmhelpline.mp.gov.in/. ({n. d.}). Accessed: 16/1/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. {n. d.}. Public Health Resource Network. http://phrsindia.org/. ({n. d.}). Accessed: 15/5/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. {n. d.}. Right to Food Campaign, India. http://www.righttofoodcampaign.in/. ({n.d.}). Accessed: 9/3/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nava Ashraf, Oriana Bandiera, and B. Kelsey Jack. 2014. No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public service delivery. Journal of Public Economics 120 (2014), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Parthasarathi Banerjee. 2006. Land Acquisition and Peasant Resistance at Singur. Economic and Political Weekly 41, 46 (2006), 4718--4720. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4418907Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Thomas Carothers and William Barndt. 1999. Civil Society. Foreign Policy 117 (1999), 18--29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1149558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dipanjan Chakraborty and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2015. Building Citizen Engagement into the Implementation of Welfare Schemes in Rural India. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Facebook. {n. d.}. NREGA Sahayata Kendra. http://bit.ly/2pMJxkw. ({n. d.}). Accessed: 18/4/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jayati Ghosh. 2006. The "Right to Work" and Recent Legislation in India. Social Scientist 34, 1/2 (2006), 88--102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3518173Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Brenton Holmes. 2011. Citizens' engagement in policymaking and the design of public services. Research Paper, Parliament of Australia, Department of Parliamentary Services 1, 2011--12 (2011). http://bit.ly/2qkZtdk Accessed: 10/3/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. IBNLive.com. 2013. CAG's NREGA report reveal poor implementation, use of funds. http://bit.ly/2rhQPOa. (2013). Accessed: 15/1/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Shikha Jha and Bharat Ramaswami. 2010. How can food subsidies work better? Answers from India and the Philippines. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series 221 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. LiveMint. 2015. Corruption Catalogue Public Distribution System. http://bit.ly/2rh2Brg. (2015). Accessed: 15/1/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Meghana Marathe, Jacki O'Neill, Paromita Pain, and William Thies. 2016. ICT-Enabled Grievance Redressal in Central India: A Comparative Analysis. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. MHA. 2011. Census of India 2011: Houses, Household Amenities and Assets-2011. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/hlo/Data_sheet/India/HLO_Indicators.pdf. (2011). Accessed: 09/02/2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Anjali K. Mohan, Edward Cutrell, and Balaji Parthasarathy. 2013. Instituting Credibility, Accountability and Transparency in Local Service Delivery?: Helpline and Aasthi in Karnataka, India. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers - Volume 1 (ICTD '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 238--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Aparna Moitra, Vishnupriya Das, Gram Vaani, Archna Kumar, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2016. Design Lessons from Creating a Mobile-based Community Media Platform in Rural India. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Aparna Moitra, Archna Kumar, and Aaditeshwar Seth. {n. d.}. Mapping Jharkhand Mobile Vaani's Community Mobilization Strategies. In Submission ({n. d.}).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Preeti Mudliar, Jonathan Donner, and William Thies. 2012. Emergent practices around CGNet Swara, voice forum for citizen journalism in rural India. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. G.S. Mudur. 2017. Grim diagnosis of govt health cover. http://bit.ly/2qmIMjj. (2017). Accessed: 2/5/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jayaprakash Narayan. {n. d.}. Pressure Groups and Democratic Governance - An Indian Perspective. http://bit.ly/2pOljFK. ({n. d.}). Accessed: 9/3/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sriharini Narayanan. 2010. Accountability and the New Media: Use of ICTs in Governance in India. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 28, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Vijaysinh Parmar. 2012. Ghost beneficiaries galore under NREGA in Amreli village. http://bit.ly/2pBkR2o. (2012). Accessed: 15/1/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hindustan Times. 2017. No electricity, doctors use mobile phone flashlights in infra-starved Jharkhand hospital. http://bit.ly/2pNO19y. (2017). Accessed: 2/5/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Maharashtra State Rural Livelihood Mission (MSRLM). 2014. Self Help Groups, SHG Federations and Livelihoods Collectives in Maharashtra. An Institutional Assessment. http://bit.ly/2qmHnsR. (2014). Accessed: 14/5/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. The Economic Times. 2017. Irregularities detected in allotment of Indira Awaas Yojana. http://bit.ly/2pMFFjD. (2017). Accessed: 2/5/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Aaditeshwar Seth, Abhishek Katyal, Rohit Bhatia, Dinesh Kapoor, Balachandran C, Vidya Venkat, Aparna Moitra, Sayonee Chatterjee, Mayank Shivam, Zahir Koradia, and Praveen Naidu. 2012. Application of Mobile Phones and Social Media to Improve Grievance Redressal in Public Services. In M4D (M4D). http://www.cse.iitd.ernet.in/~aseth/m4dpositionpaper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Debra Singh, Joel Negin, Michael Otim, Christopher Garimoi Orach, and Robert Cumming. 2015. The effect of payment and incentives on motivation and focus of community health workers: five case studies from low- and middle-income countries. Human Resources for Health 13, 1 (2015), 58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Vivek Srinivasan. 2015. Delivering Public Services Effectively: Tamil Nadu and Beyond. Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Vivek Srinivasan, Vibhore Vardhan, Snigdha Kar, Siddhartha Asthana, Rajendran Narayanan, Pushpendra Singh, Dipanjan Chakraborty, Amarjeet Singh, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2013. Airavat: An Automated System to Increase Transparency and Accountability in Social Welfare Schemes in India. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development: Notes - Volume 2 (ICTD '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Dietland Stolle and Thomas R. Rochon. 1998. Are All Associations Alike? American Behavioral Scientist 42, 1 (1998), 47--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Md. Abu Taher. 1999. Politicization of Trade Unions: Issues and Challenges in Bangladesh Perspective. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations 34, 4 (1999), 403--420. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27767614Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruhi Tewari. 2015. More than 70% NREGA wages unpaid this fiscal. http://bit.ly/2pBs1DN. (2015). Accessed: 15/1/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jasper van Teeffelen and Isa Baud. 2011. Exercising Citizenship: Invited and Negotiated Spaces in Grievance Redressal Systems in Hubli-Dharwad. Environment and Urbanization Asia 2, 2 (2011), 169--185. arXiv:http://eua.sagepub.com/content/2/2/169.full.pdf+htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Rajesh Veeraraghavan. 2013. Dealing with the Digital Panopticon: The Use and Subversion of ICT in an Indian Bureaucracy. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers - Volume 1 (ICTD '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 248--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Katrin Voltmer. 2009. The Media, Government Accountability, and Citizen Engagement. In Public Sentinel: News Media and Governance Reform, P. Norris (Ed.). World Bank Publications, Chapter 6. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=xzFVxDDhfnkCGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. M. Weiner. 1962. The politics of scarcity: public pressure and political response in India. University of Chicago Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=IVnRAAAAMAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Wikipedia. {n. d.}. Labour Movement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_movement. ({n. d.}). Accessed: 9/3/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Findings from a Civil Society Mediated and Technology Assisted Grievance Redressal Model in Rural India

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICTD '17: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
          November 2017
          333 pages
          ISBN:9781450352772
          DOI:10.1145/3136560
          • Conference Chair:
          • Umar Saif

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 November 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate22of116submissions,19%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader