Bo Sun
ABSTRACT
The information technologies are integrated into education so that mass data is available reflecting each action of students in online environments. Numerous studies have exploited these data to do the learning analytics.In this paper, we aim at achieving the show of personalized indicators for students per personality trait on the learning analytics dashboard (LAD) and present the preliminary results. First, we employ learning behavior engagement (LBE) to describe students' learning behaviors, exploited to analyze the significant differences among students having different personality traits. In experiments, fifteen behavioral indicators are tested. The experimental results show that there are significant differences about some behavioral indicators among personality traits. Second, some of these behavioral indicators are presented on the LAD and distributed in each area of interest (AOI). Hence, students can visualize their behavioral data that they care about in AOIs anytime in the learning process. Through the analysis of eye-movement including the fixation duration, fixation count, heat map and track map, we have found that there are significant differences about some visual indicators in AOIs. This is partly consistent with the results of behavioral indicators.
- M.R. Barrick and M.K. Mount. 1991. The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 51, 1 (1991), 849–857.Google Scholar
- T. Chamorro-Premuzic and A. Furnham. 2008. Personality Intelligence and Approaches to Learning as Predictors of Academic Performance. Pers. Individ. Dif 44, 7 (2008), 1596–1603.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P.T. Costa and R.R. McCrae. 1992. Revised Neo Personality Inventory (neo pi-r) and Neo Five-factor Inventory (NEOFFI). Psychological Assessment Resources (1992), 17–20.Google Scholar
- S.E. Hampson and L.R. Goldberg. 2006. A First Large Cohort Study of Personality Trait Stability over the 40 Years Between Elementary School and Midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91, 4 (2006), 763–779.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M.A. Just and P.A Carpenter. 1980. A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension. Psychological Review 87 (1980), 329–354.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S.J. Karau M. Komarraju and R.R. Schmeck. 2009. Role of the Big Five Personality Traits in Predicting College Students’ Academic Motivation and Achievement. Learn. Individ. Differ 19, 1 (2009), 47–52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S.B. Miles and D. Stipek. 2006. Contemporaneous and Longitudinal Associations Between Social Behavior and Literacy Achievement in a Sample of Low-Income Elementary School Children. Child Development 1 (Feb. 2006), 103–117.Google Scholar
- E. Molleman. 2005. Diversity in Demographic Characteristics, Abilities and Personality Traits: Do Faultlines Affect Team Functioning? Gr. Decis. Negot 14, 3 (2005), 173–193.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Dolog N. Henze and W. Nejdl. 2004. Reasoning and Ontologies for Personalized E-learning in the Semantic Web. Educational Technology and Society 7, 4 (2004), 82–97.Google Scholar
- M. Samancioglu N. Ibrahimoglu, I. Unaldi and M. Baglibel. 2013. The Relationship between Personality Traits and Learning Styles: a Cluster Analysis. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education 2, 3 (2013), 93–108.Google Scholar
- J. Tramper O. Sessink, R. Beeftink and R. Hartog. 2003. Author-Defined Storage in the Next Generation Learning Management Systems. In 3rd IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT’03). 57–61.Google Scholar
- A.A. Pina. 2012. An Overview of Learning Management Systems. Virtual Learning Environments: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications. USA: IGI Global Differences of Online Learning Behaviors and Eye-Movement... MIE’17, November 13, 2017, Glasgow, UK (2012), 33–51.Google Scholar
- T. Ryan and S. Xenos. 2011. Who Uses Facebook? An Investigation into the Relationship between the Big Five, Shyness, Narcissism, Loneliness and Facebook Usage. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 5 (2011), 1658–1664. Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Siemens and R.S. Baker. 2012. Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining: Towards Communication and Collaboration. In 2nd International Conference Learning Analytics Knowledge. 252–254. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H.M. Truong. 2016. Integrating Learning Styles and Adaptive E-learning System: Current Developments, Problems and Opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior 55 (2016), 1185–1193. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J.J. Elshout V.V. Busato, F.J. Prins and C. Hamaker. 1998. The Relation between Learning Styles, the Big Five Personality Traits and Achievement Motivation in Higher Education. Personality and Individual Differences 26, 1 (1998), 129–140.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Waits and L. Lewis. 2003. Distance Education at Degree-granting Postsecondary institution 2001-2002. Technical Report. National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC. Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Difference Of Indicators Among Personality Traits 2.1 Identifying Personality Traits 2.2 Difference of Behavior Indicators 3 Difference Of Indicators In AOIs 3.1 Description of AOIs 3.2 Difference of Visual Indicators 4 Conclusions Acknowledgments ReferencesGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Differences of online learning behaviors and eye-movement between students having different personality traits
Recommendations
Individual identification using personality traits
In this article, a pioneer study is conducted to evaluate the possibility of identifying people through their personality traits. The study is conducted using the answers of a population of 734 individuals to a collection of 206 items. These items aim ...
The response of eye-movement and pupil size to audio instruction while viewing a moving target
ETRA '00: Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on Eye tracking research & applicationsEye movement reflects a viewer's visual information process. This study examines whether eye-movement responds to the viewer's cognitive load. It is already known that pupil size and blink can use as an indicator of mental workload. Saccades are rapid ...
The act of task difficulty and eye-movement frequency for the 'Oculo-motor indices'
ETRA '02: Proceedings of the 2002 symposium on Eye tracking research & applicationsThe oculo-motor re ects the viewer s ability to process visual information. This paper examines whether the oculo-motor was affected by two factors: rstly task dif culty and secondly eye-movement frequency. In this paper, oculo-motor indices were de ned ...
Comments