skip to main content
10.1145/3139958.3140001acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fast exact parallel 3D mesh intersection algorithm using only orientation predicates

Published:07 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an algorithm to compute the intersection of two 3D triangulated meshes. It has applications in GIS, CAD and Additive Manufacturing, and was developed to process big datasets quickly and correctly. The speed comes from simple regular data structures that parallelize very well. The correctness comes from using multiple-precision rational arithmetic to prevent roundoff errors and the resulting topological inconsistencies, and symbolic perturbation (simulation of simplicity) to handle special cases (geometric degeneracies). To simplify the symbolic perturbation, the algorithm employs only orientation predicates. This paper focuses on the challenges and solutions of the implementing symbolic perturbation. Our preliminary implementation has intersected two objects totalling 8M triangles in 11 elapsed seconds on a dual 8-core Xeon. The competing LibiGL took 248 seconds and CGAL took 2726 seconds. Our software is freely available for nonprofit research.

References

  1. AIM@SHAPE-VISIONAIR Shape Repository 2017. AIM@SHAPE-VISIONAIR Shape Repository. http://visionair.ge.imati.cnr.it// (accessed on Jun-2017). (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. Akman, Wm. Randolph Franklin, Mohan Kankanhalli, and Chandrasekhar Narayanaswami. 1989. Geometric Computing and the Uniform Grid Data Technique. Comput. Aided Design 21, 7 (1989), 410--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Hichem Barki, Gael Guennebaud, and Sebti Foufou. 2015. Exact, robust, and efficient regularized Booleans on general 3D meshes. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 70, 6 (2015), 1235--1254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gilbert Bernstein and Don Fussell. 2009. Fast, exact, linear booleans. Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing 28, 5 (2009), 1269--1278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. CGAL 2016. Cgal, Computational Geometry Algorithms Library. (2016). http://www.cgal.org (accessed on Apr-2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Paolo Cignoni, Claudio Rocchini, and Roberto Scopigno. 1998. Metro: Measuring error on simplified surfaces. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 17. Wiley Online Library, 167--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Matthijs Douze, Jean-Sébastien Franco, and Bruno Raffin. 2015. QuickCSG: Arbitrary and faster boolean combinations of n solids. Ph.D. Dissertation. Inria-Research Centre Grenoble--Rhône-Alpes; INRIA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. David Eberly. 2008. Triangulation by ear clipping. Geometric Tools (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Herbert Edelsbrunner and Ernst Peter Mücke. 1990. Simulation of simplicity: a technique to cope with degenerate cases in geometric algorithms. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 9, 1 (1990), 66--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. F.R. Feito, C.J. Ogayar, R.J. Segura, and M.L. Rivero. 2013. Fast and accurate evaluation of regularized Boolean operations on triangulated solids. Computer-Aided Design 45, 3 (2013), 705--716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wm. Randolph Franklin, Narayanaswami Chandrasekhar, Mohan Kankanhalli, Manoj Seshan, and Varol Akman. 1988. Efficiency of uniform grids for intersection detection on serial and parallel machines. In New Trends in Computer Graphics (Proc. Computer Graphics International'88), Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann and D. Thalmann (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, 288--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Peter Hachenberger, Lutz Kettner, and Kurt Mehlhorn. 2007. Boolean operations on 3D selective Nef complexes: Data structure, algorithms, optimized implementation and experiments. Computational Geometry 38, 1 (2007), 64--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X.Y. Jiang and H. Bunke. 1993. An optimal algorithm for extracting the regions of a plane graph. Pattern Recognition Letters 14, 7 (1993), 553--558. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Cyril Leconte, Hichem Barki, and Florent Dupont. 2010. Exact and Efficient Booleans for Polyhedra. Technical Report RR-LIRIS-2010-018. LIRIS UMR 5205 CNRS/INSA de Lyon/Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1/Université Lumière Lyon 2/École Centrale de Lyon. http://liris.cnrs.fr/publis/?id=4883Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Salles V.G. Magalhães, Marcus V.A. Andrade, W Randolph Franklin, and Wenli Li. 2016. PinMesh - Fast and exact 3D point location queries using a uniform grid. Computers & Graphics 58 (2016), 1--11. Shape Modeling International 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Salles V. G. Magalhães, Marcus V. A. A. Andrade, W Randolph Franklin, and Wenli Li. 2015. Fast exact parallel map overlay using a two-level uniform grid. In Proc. of the 4th ACM Bigspatial (BigSpatial '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Salles V. G. Magalhães, Marcus V. A. A. Andrade, W Randolph Franklin, Wenli Li, and Maurıcio G. Gruppi. 2016. Exact intersection of 3D geometric models. In Proc. of XVII Brazilian Symposium on Geoinformatics (GeoInfo '16). 44--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rafael Jesus Segura and Francisco R. Feito. 2001. Algorithms to Test Ray-Triangle Intersection. Comparative Study. In The 9-th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision'2001. 76--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. SFCGAL 2017. SFCGAL. (2017). http://www.sfcgal.org/ (accessed on Jun-2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Chee-Keng Yap. 1988. Symbolic treatment of geometric degeneracies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 348--358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Qingnan Zhou, Eitan Grinspun, Denis Zorin, and Alec Jacobson. 2016. Mesh Arrangements for Solid Geometry. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 35, 4 (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Qingnan Zhou and Alec Jacobson. 2016. Thingi10K: A Dataset of 10,000 3D-Printing Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.04797 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Fast exact parallel 3D mesh intersection algorithm using only orientation predicates

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGSPATIAL '17: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
        November 2017
        677 pages
        ISBN:9781450354905
        DOI:10.1145/3139958

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 November 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGSPATIAL '17 Paper Acceptance Rate39of193submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader