ABSTRACT
Learning Analytics1 is a powerful tool that provides rich information for students, teachers and academic authorities. There is a wide range of possible applications, and one of them is leveraging the information to improve the instructional design of a course. In this research, we introduce the results of a Learning Analytics engine to improve all the stages of an Action Research experience. We have carried out three iterations: iteration 1, devoted to design an instructional course using an automated learning platform that collects data from the students; iteration 2, focused on the analysis of the individual and aggregated data collected from the students to obtain group behaviors; and iteration 3, currently under way, devoted to improve the structure of the course using the results of the previous iterations. We have made use of some graphical representations of the data that help to understand the aggregated data and to detect important events and moments of intervention. We have detected that the behavior of the students is strongly conditioned by the deadline structure of the course and that there is usually a crucial moment, by halfway of the course, where the situation is tending to stabilize and which is a good moment to reinforce the supervision on the student. Finally, we have stated that low performance students are usually recoverable to the last moment.
- John P. Campbell and Diana G. Oblinger. 2007. Academic Analytics. Educase (2007). Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB6101.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Wilfred Carr and Stephen Kemmis. 1986. Becoming critical: education, knowledge, and action research. Falmer Press, London; Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- Francisco José Gallego-Durán, Carlos José Villagra-Arnedo, Faraón Llorens-Largo, and Rafael Molina-Carmona. 2007. PLMan: A Game-Based Learning Activity for Teaching Logic Thinking and Programming. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 33, 2(B) (2007), 807--815.Google Scholar
- Philip J. Goldstein and Richard N. Katz. 2005. Academic Analytics: The Uses of Management Information and Technology in Higher Education. Educase (2005). Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERS0508/ekf0508.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Phillip A. Harris. 2013. Data Driven Design: How Today's Product Designer Approaches User Experience to Create Radically Innovative Digital Products (1 edition ed.). K & R Publications.Google Scholar
- Magnus Karlberg, Magnus Löfstrand, Stefan Sandberg, and Michael Lundin. 2013. State of the art in simulation-driven design. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 18, 1 (2013), 68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. B. Kotsiantis. 2012. Use of Machine Learning Techniques for Educational Proposes: A Decision Support System for Forecasting Students' Grades. Artif. Intell. Rev. 37, 4 (April 2012), 331--344. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ioanna Lykourentzou, Ioannis Giannoukos, Vassilis Nikolopoulos, George Mpardis, and Vassili Loumos. 2009. Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques. Comput. Educ. 53, 3 (2009), 950--965. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leah P. Macfadyen and Shane Dawson. 2010. Mining LMS Data to Develop an "Early Warning System" for Educators: A Proof of Concept. Comput. Educ. 54, 2 (February 2010), 588--599. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marriner David Merrill. 2009. Instructional-design Theories and Models: Building a common knowledge base. In A Reigeluth C.M. & Carr-Chellman (ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 41--56. Retrieved from https://books.google.es/books?id=MazF0wv5lkQCGoogle Scholar
- Eric Miller. 2004. Analysis Driven Design For Electronic Systems. Phoenix Analysis & Design Technologies. Retrieved July 27, 2017 from http://www.ansys.com/-/media/Ansys/corporate/resourcelibrary/conference-paper/2004-Int-ANSYS-Conf-145.PDFGoogle Scholar
- Gary R. Morrison (Ed.). 2011. Designing effective instruction (6th ed ed.). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
- Lori Niles-Hofmann. Data-Driven Learning Design. Retrieved July 26, 2017 from http://www.loriniles.com/ebook/Google Scholar
- Charles M. Reigeluth. 2011. An instructional theory for the post-industrial age. Educ. Technol. Mag. 51, 5 (October 2011), 25--29.Google Scholar
- Robert A. Reiser and John V. Dempsey. 2007. Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed ed.). Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P.D. Schalk, D.P. Wick, P.R. Turner, and M.W. Ramsdell. 2011. Predictive assessment of student performance for early strategic guidance. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011, S2H--1--S2H--5. Google ScholarDigital Library
- George Siemens. 2012. Learning analytics: envisioning a research discipline and a domain of practice. In In: International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK, 4--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carlos Villagra-Arnedo, Francisco J. Gallego-Durán, Patricia Compañ-Rosique, Faraón Llorens-Largo, and Rafael Molina-Carmona. 2016. Predicting academic performance from behavioural and learning data. Int. J. Des. Nat. Ecodynamics 11, 3 (2016). Retrieved from http://www.witpress.com/journals/dneGoogle Scholar
- Carlos Villagrá Arnedo, Francisco J. Gallego-Durán, Faraón Llorens Largo, Patricia Compañ, Rosana Satorre Cuerda, and Rafael Molina-Carmona. 2015. Detección precoz de dificultades en el aprendizaje. Herramienta para la predicción del rendimiento de los estudiantes (Early detection of learning difficulties. Tool for predicting student performance). In La Sociedad del Aprendizaje. Actas del III Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad. CINAIC 2015. Fundación General de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
- Carlos Villagra-Arnedo, Francisco J. Gallego-Durán, Rafael Molina-Carmona, and Faraón Llorens-Largo. 2015. Boosting the Learning Process with Progressive Performance Prediction. In Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World, Gráinne Conole, Tomaž Klobučar, Christoph Rensing, Johannes Konert and Élise Lavoué (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 638--641. Retrieved January 28, 2016 from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_77Google Scholar
- Alvin Y. Wang and Michael H. Newlin. 2002. Predictors of performance in the virtual classroom: Identifying and helping at-risk cyber-students. J. High. Educ. 29, 10 (2002), 21--25.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Analytics-driven redesign of an instructional course
Recommendations
Reforming higher education with ePortfolio implementation, enhanced by learning analytics
AbstractIn a time when blended learning is the norm and not the exception, ePortfolio implementation has the potential to serve as a tool for 21st-century skills development, namely self-reflection, self-assessment, goal-setting, evidence-...
Highlights- Positivist and Constructivist approaches to ePortfolio implementation were employed.
Application of the SPOC Instructional Model Supported by E-Schoolbag Teaching System
ICDEL '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Distance Education and LearningThe innovation of teaching mode based on information technology specially embodies deep integration of information technology and education. The emergence of massive open online courses (MOOCs) not only changes the ecology of education, but also ...
Setting learning analytics in context: overcoming the barriers to large-scale adoption
LAK '14: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And KnowledgeOnce learning analytics have been successfully developed and tested, the next step is to implement them at a larger scale -- across a faculty, an institution or an educational system. This introduces a new set of challenges, because education is a ...
Comments