skip to main content
10.1145/3144826.3145441acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

The role of the narrator point of view and the similarity with the protagonist in narratives designed to reduce prejudice towards stigmatized immigrants

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This project tries to analyze those factors that can increase the identification with stigmatized characters' protagonists of narrative messages designed to improve the intergroup attitudes. In this sense, previous research has demonstrated the importance of identification with the characters as one of the fundamental mechanisms of narrative persuasion. However, the study of the factors that increase the identification with the characters of a narrative message is still scarce.

The present project will specifically focus on the role of two independent variables that can increase identification and indirectly influence intergroup attitudes: the narrator point of view and the similarity between the character and the audience of the message. To this end, two experimental studies will be conducted, using narratives (written and audiovisual) in which the protagonist will be a stigmatized immigrant (Moroccan immigrant). Both studies will contrast the effect of the narrator point of view and the similarity between the character and audience, on the identification with the character and the attitudes toward immigration.

References

  1. Allport, G. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Perseus Book Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. 2016. Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, M., Bell, R. A., & Taylor, L. D. 2016. Narrator Point of View and Persuasion in Health Narratives: The Role of Protagonist--Reader Similarity, Identification, and Self-Referencing. Journal of Health Communication, 21(8), 908--918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chung, A. H., & Slater, M. D. 2013. Reducing stigma and out‐group distinctions through perspective‐taking in narratives. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 894--911. CIS, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CIS, 2014. Actitudes hacia la inmigración (Estudio n° 3019). Fecha consulta: 22/01/2017. Recuperado de: http://www.cis.es/cis/export/sites/default/Archivos/Marginales/3000_3019/3019/es3019mar.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. 2001. Defining identification: a theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Consejo del Diálogo Social de Castilla y León, 2014: Acuerdo del Consejo del Diálogo Social de Castilla y León, de 30 de diciembre, de la Junta de Castilla y León, por el que se aprueba el III Plan Estratégico de Inmigración y Convivencia Intercultural de Castilla y León 2014-2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. De Graaf, A. 2014. The effectiveness of adaptation of the protagonist in narrative impact: similarity influences health beliefs through self‐referencing. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 73--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. De Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., y Beentjes, J. W. J. 2012. Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39(6), 802--823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. García-Peñalvo, F. J. 2014. Formación en la sociedad del conocimiento, un programa de doctorado con una perspectiva interdisciplinar. Education in the Knowledge Society, 15(1), 4--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Green, M. C. and Brock, T. C. 2000. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79, 5, 701--721.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Harwood, J. 2010. The contact space: a novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(2), 147--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hayes, A. F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press, Nueva York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoeken, H., Kolthoff, M., & Sanders, J. 2016. Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 42, 292--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hoeken, H., y Fikkers, K. M. 2014. Issue-relevant thinking and identification as mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Poetics, 44, 84--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Igartua, J. J. 2007. Persuasión narrativa: El papel de la identificación con los personajes a través de las culturas. Editorial Club Universitario, AlicanteGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Igartua, J. J. 2010. Identification with characters and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films. Communications. The European Journal of Communication Research, 35(4), 347373.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Igartua, J. J., y Barrios, I. M. 2012. Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies. Processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 514--531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Igartua, J. J., y Frutos, F. J. 2017. Enhancing attitudes toward stigmatized groups with movies: mediating and moderating processes of narrative persuasion. International Journal of Communication, 11, 158--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Igartua, J. J., y Frutos, F. J. 2016. Procesos de recepción y efectos socio-cognitivos de películas sobre inmigración. El papel moderador del prejuicio hacia inmigrantes. Migraciones, 40, 33--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Igartua, J. J., y Vega, J. 2016. Identification with characters, elaboration, and counterarguing in entertainment-education interventions through audiovisual fiction. Journal of Health Communication, 21(3), 293--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. INE, 2016. Proyecciones de Población 2016--2066. Fecha consulta: 22/01/2017. Recuperado de: http://www.ine.es/prensa/np994.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Junta de Castilla y León, 2010: Acuerdo 44/2010, de 14 de mayo, de la Junta de Castilla y León, por el que se aprueba la Agenda para la Población de Castilla y León 2010-2020 (Boletín Oficial de Castilla y León n° 92, de 17-05-2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaufman, G. F., y Libby, L. K. 2012. Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ministerio del Interior, 2016. Informe 2015 sobre incidentes relacionados con los delitos de odio en España. Fecha consulta: 25/01/2017. Recuperado de: http://www.interior.gob.es/documents/10180/3066430/Informe+Delitos+de+Odio+2015.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Moyer-Gusé, E. 2008. Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407--425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Müller, F. 2009. Entertaining anti-racism. Multicultural television drama, identification and perceptions of ethnic threat. Communications, 34(3), 239--256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Nan, X., Dahlstrom, M. F., Richards, A., y Rangarajan, S. 2015. Influence of evidence type and narrative type on HPV risk perception and intention to obtain the HPV vaccine. Health Communication, 30(3), 301--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Park, S. Y. 2012. Mediated intergroup contact: concept explication, synthesis, and application. Mass Communication and Society, 15(1), 136--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Pettigrew, T. F., y Tropp, L. R. 2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751--783.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Pettigrew, T. F., y Tropp, L. R. 2008. How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922--934.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. 2005. The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Slater, M. D. and Rouner, D. 2002. Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Commun. Theor. 12(2), 173--191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Tajfel, H. 1982. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The role of the narrator point of view and the similarity with the protagonist in narratives designed to reduce prejudice towards stigmatized immigrants

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          TEEM 2017: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
          October 2017
          723 pages
          ISBN:9781450353861
          DOI:10.1145/3144826

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 October 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          TEEM 2017 Paper Acceptance Rate84of109submissions,77%Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader