skip to main content
10.1145/3151547.3151550acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A 2-Step Approach to Improve Data-driven Parking Availability Predictions

Published:07 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Knowing where to park in advance is a most wished feature by many drivers. In recent years, many research efforts have been spent to analyse massive amount of parking information, to learn availability trends and thus to predict, within a Parking Guidance and Information (PGI) system, where there is the highest chance to find free parking spaces. The most of these solutions exploits raw data coming from stationary sensors or crowd-sensed by mobile probes. In both the cases, these massive amounts of data present a high level of noise. In this paper we propose a 2-step approach to predict parking space availability with the twofold goal to handle the noise in the data and to significantly reduce the space needed to store these models. In particular, in the first step, we smooth the raw parking data by using Support Vector Regressions (SVR) in combination with a specifically defined technique to tune the SVR parameters. In the second step, on top of this smoothed trend curve, we train a multidimensional SVR model, representing parking space availability, and suitable for parking predictions. The proposal has been empirically evaluated on a real-world dataset of on-street parking information from the SFpark project, and compared against a standard, one-step SVR model with different settings. Results show that the predictions obtained with the proposed approach are always by far more accurate, with a statistically significant difference, while requiring a fraction of the storage normally used for raw data.

References

  1. F. Bock, S. D. Martino, and M. Sester. What are the potentialities of crowdsourcing for dynamic maps of on-street parking spaces? In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science, pages 19--24. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. Bush and C. Chavis. Safety analysis of on-street parking on an urban principal arterial 2. Technical report, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. F. Caicedo, C. Blazquez, and P. Miranda. Prediction of parking space availability in real time. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8):7281--7290, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Caliskan, A. Barthels, B. Scheuermann, and M. Mauve. Predicting parking lot occupancy in vehicular ad hoc networks. In Proc. 65th IEEE Veh. Technology Conf., pages 277--281, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Corazza, S. Di Martino, F. Ferrucci, C. Gravino, F. Sarro, and E. Mendes. Using tabu search to configure support vector regression for effort estimation. Empirical Software Engineering, 18(3):506--546, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik. Support-vector networks. Machine learning, 20(3):273--297, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Hofmann, B. Schölkopf, and A. J. Smola. Kernel methods in machine learning. The annals of statistics, pages 1171--1220, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G. Jossé, M. Schubert, and H.-P. Kriegel. Probabilistic parking queries using aging functions. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pages 452--455. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. S. Keerthi. Efficient tuning of svm hyperparameters using radius/margin bound and iterative algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 13(5):1225--1229, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Lin, H. Rivano, and F. L. MouÃńl. A survey of smart parking solutions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, PP(99):1--25, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Lookingbill. Predicting parking availability, July 9 2013. US Patent 8,484,151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Ma, O. Wolfson, and B. Xu. Updetector: sensing parking/unparking activities using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science, pages 76--85. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Mathur, S. Kaul, M. Gruteser, and W. Trappe. Parknet: a mobile sensor network for harvesting real time vehicular parking information. In Proc. 2009 MobiHoc S 3 Workshop, pages 25--28, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Rajabioun and P. Ioannou. On-street and off-street parking availability prediction using multivariate spatiotemporal models. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 16(5):2913--2924, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. F. Richter, S. Di Martino, and D. C. Mattfeld. Temporal and spatial clustering for a parking prediction service. In Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), 2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on, pages 278--282. IEEE, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. F. Sarro, S. Di Martino, F. Ferrucci, and C. Gravino. A further analysis on the use of genetic algorithm to configure support vector machines for inter-release fault prediction. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on applied computing, pages 1215--1220. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. SFMTA. SFPark: Putting theory into practice. Pilot project summary and lessons learned, 2014. {Online; accessed 24-June-2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. Shoup. Cruising for parking. Transport Policy, 13(6):479--486, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. V. Vapnik. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science & business media, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Z. Wu, N. E. Huang, S. R. Long, and C.-K. Peng. On the trend, detrending, and variability of nonlinear and nonstationary time series. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(38):14889--14894, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Y. Zheng, S. Rajasegarar, and C. Leckie. Parking availability prediction for sensor-enabled car parks in smart cities. In IEEE 10th International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing. IEEE, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A 2-Step Approach to Improve Data-driven Parking Availability Predictions

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            IWCTS'17: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Computational Transportation Science
            November 2017
            46 pages
            ISBN:9781450354912
            DOI:10.1145/3151547

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 November 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate42of57submissions,74%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader