skip to main content
10.1145/3154862.3154870acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design considerations for semi-automated tracking: self-care plans in spinal cord injury

Published:23 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Self-care in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is highly complex and individualized. Patients struggle to adapt to life with SCI, especially when they go home after rehabilitation. We conducted a field study to understand how self-care plans work for patients in their lived experience and what requirements there might be for an augmentative system. We found that patients develop their own self-care plans over time, and that routinization plays a key role in SCI self-care. Importantly, self-care activities exist in different states of routinization that have implications for the technological support that should be provided. Our findings suggest that self-care can be supported by different types of semi-automated tracking that account for the different routinization of activities, the collaborative nature of care, and the life-long, dynamic nature of this condition. The findings from our study also extend recent guidelines for semi-automated tracking in health.

References

  1. Ofra Amir, Barbara J. Grosz, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Sonja M. Swenson, and Lee M. Sanders. 2015. From Care Plans to Care Coordination: Opportunities for Computer Support of Teamwork in Complex Healthcare. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 1419--1428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jakob E. Bardram, Mads Frost, Károly Szántó, Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Maj Vinberg, and Lars Vedel Kessing. 2013. Designing Mobile Health Technology for Bipolar Disorder: A Field Trial of the Monarca System. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 2627--2636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Eun Kyoung Choe, Saeed Abdullah, Mashfiqui Rabbi, Edison Thomaz, Daniel A Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, Matthew Kay, Gregory D Abowd, Tanzeem Choudhury, and James Fogarty. 2017. Semi-Automated Tracking: A Balanced Approach for Self-Monitoring Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 1: 74--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding Quantified-selfers' Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Adele Clarke. 2005. Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sunny Consolvo, Predrag Klasnja, David W McDonald, and James A Landay. 2014. Designing for healthy lifestyles: Design considerations for mobile technologies to encourage consumer health and wellness. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction 6, 3--4: 167--315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Patricia A Ganz and Erin E Hahn. 2008. Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 26, 5: 759--767.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Daniel G Garrett and Benjamin M Bluml. 2005. Patient self-management program for diabetes: first-year clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 45, 2: 130--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Aarne Lahdensuo, Tari Haahtela, Jaakko Herrala, Tuomo Kava, Kirsti Kiviranta, Paula Kuusisto, Erkki Peramaki, Tuija Poussa, Seppo Saarelainen, and Thore Svahn. 1996. Randomised comparison of guided self management and traditional treatment of asthma over one year. Bmj 312, 7033: 748--752.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ian Li, Anind K. Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2012. Using Context to Reveal Factors That Affect Physical Activity. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 1: 7:1--7:21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lena Mamykina, Elizabeth Mynatt, Patricia Davidson, and Daniel Greenblatt. 2008. MAHI: Investigation of Social Scaffolding for Reflective Thinking in Diabetes Management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), 477--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michelle A. Meade. Health Mechanics: Tools for the Self-Management of Spinal Cord Injury. University of Michigan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Francisco Nunes and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2015. Self-Care Technologies and Collaboration. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31, 12: 869--881.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Francisco Nunes, Nervo Verdezoto, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Morten Kyng, Erik Grönvall, and Cristiano Storni. 2015. Self-Care Technologies in HCI: Trends, Tensions, and Opportunities. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 6: 33:1--33:45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mieke Rijken, Martyn Jones, Monique Heijmans, and Anna Dixon. 2008. Supporting self-management. Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective: 116--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Anselm Leonard Strauss. 2008. Continual permutations of action. Aldine Transaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PervasiveHealth '17: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
    May 2017
    503 pages
    ISBN:9781450363631
    DOI:10.1145/3154862

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate55of116submissions,47%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader