skip to main content
10.1145/3154862.3154890acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Exploring clinical correlations in centroid-based gait metrics from depth data collected in the home

Published:23 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

A longitudinal study in the home setting using inexpensive depth cameras was done over 34 months to investigate the ability to predict clinical events. Previous work developed a set of metrics based upon the movement of the centroid computed from segmented depth data [14]. A predictive analysis method is developed allowing the identification of significant changes in the subject's gait. These changes are compared to the subject's clinical events and correlated with standard Fall Risk Assessments (FRA). The method developed here allows the proper clustering of all purposeful walks in the residence to isolate the subject from visitors, and identification of significant changes using a set of metrics unique to each subject. Correct detection of events and non-events ranged between 75% and 94% across a set of 7 residents. These predicted events were also found to correlate strongly with established monthly FRAs.

References

  1. Katherine Berg. 1989. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 41, 6: 304--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. G Bergen, MR Stevens, and ER Burns. 2016. Falls and Fall Injuries Among Adults Aged ≥ 65 Years - United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65: 993--998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Richard W. Bohannon. 1997. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20--79 years: reference values and determinants. Age and ageing 26, 1: 15--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jack M. Guralnik, Luigi Ferrucci, Eleanor M. Simonsick, Marcel E. Salive, and Robert B. Wallace. 1995. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. New England Journal of Medicine 332, 9: 556--562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Timothy C. Havens and James C. Bezdek. 2012. An efficient formulation of the improved visual assessment of cluster tendency (iVAT) algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 24, 5: 813--822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Pekka Kannus, Jari Parkkari, Seppo Koskinen, Seppo Niemi, Mika Palvanen, Markku Järvinen, and Ilkka Vuori. 1999. Fall-induced injuries and deaths among older adults. Jama 281, 20: 1895--1899.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. H.-K. Kuo, Suzanne G. Leveille, Y.-H. Yu, and William P. Milberg. 2006. Cognitive function, habitual gait speed, and late-life disability in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2002. Gerontology 53, 2: 102--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. N.R. Pal, K. Pal, J.M. Keller, and J.C. Bezdek. 2005. A possibilistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 13, 4: 517--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D Podsiadlo and S Richardson. 1991. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 39, 2: 142--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. P. Scuffham, Stephen Chaplin, and Rosa Legood. 2003. Incidence and costs of unintentional falls in older people in the United Kingdom. Journal of epidemiology and community health 57, 9: 740--744.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Erik E. Stone and Marjorie Skubic. 2013. Unobtrusive, Continuous, In-Home Gait Measurement Using the Microsoft Kinect. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 60, 10: 2925--2932.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Erik Stone, Marjorie Skubic, Marilyn Rantz, Carmen Abbott, and Steve Miller. 2015. Average in-home gait speed: Investigation of a new metric for mobility and fall risk assessment of elders. Gait & Posture 41, 1: 57--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. N Veronese, F Bolzetta, E Toffanello, S Zambon, M De Rui, E Perissinotto, A Coin, M Corti, G Baggio, G Crepaldi, G Sergi, and E Manzato. 2014. Association Between Short Physical Performance Battery and Falls in Older People: The Progetto Veneto Anziani Study. Rejuvenation Research 17, 3: 276--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. Wallace, C. Abbott, C. Gibson-Horn, M. Rantz, and M. Skubic. Metrics from In-Home Sensor Data to Assess the Effect of Clinical Therapies. Smart Health Journal in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Shuang Wang. 2011. Change Detetction for Eldercare Using Passive Sensing. University of Missouri-Columbia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. X. Xu, R. McGorry, L Chou, J Lin, and C Chang. 2015. Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect for measuring gait parameters during treadmill walking. Gait & Posture 42, 2: 145--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Cost of Fall Injuries in Older Persons in the United States, 2005. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved Nov. 22, 2014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PervasiveHealth '17: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
    May 2017
    503 pages
    ISBN:9781450363631
    DOI:10.1145/3154862

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate55of116submissions,47%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader