skip to main content
10.1145/3159652.3159718acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Review-Aware Answer Prediction for Product-Related Questions Incorporating Aspects

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In E-commerce sites, there are platforms for users to pose product-related questions and experienced customers may provide answers voluntarily. Among the questions asked by users, a large proportion of them are yes-no questions reflecting that users wish to know whether or not the product can satisfy a certain criterion or meet a certain expectation. Both Question Answering (QA) approaches and Community Question Answering methods are not suitable for answer prediction for new questions in this setting. The reasons are that questions are product-associated and many of them are concerned about user experiences and subjective opinions. In addition to existing question-answer pairs, user written reviews can provide useful clues for answer prediction. In this paper, we propose a new framework that can tackle the task of review-aware answer prediction for product-related questions. The aspect analytics model in this framework learns latent aspects as well as aspect-specific embeddings of reviews via a 3-order Autoencoder. One advantage of this learned model is that it can generate aspect-specific representations for new questions. The predictive answer model in our framework, learned jointly from existing questions, answers, and reviews, is able to predict the answers for new yes-no questions taking into consideration of aspects. Besides, our framework can provide supportive reviews grouped by relevant aspects serving as information for explainable answers. Experiment results on 15 different product categories from a large-scale benchmark E-commence QA dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework.

References

  1. Hadi Amiri, Philip Resnik, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and Hal Daumé III. 2016. Learning text pair similarity with context-sensitive autoencoders Proceedings of the 54th ACL. 1882--1892.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gabor Angeli, Neha Nayak, and Christopher D. Manning. 2016. Combining natural logic and shallow reasoning for question answering Proceedings of the 54th ACL. 442--452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tao Lei Hrishikesh Joshi Regina Barzilay, Tommi Jaakkola, Katerina Tymoshenko, and Alessandro Moschitti Lluıs Marquez. 2016. Semi-supervised question retrieval with gated convolutions Proceedings of The 15th NAACL-HLT. 1279--1289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jonathan Berant, Andrew Chou, Roy Frostig, and Percy Liang. 2013. Semantic parsing on Freebase from question-answer pairs Proceedings of EMNLP. 1533--1544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Meghyn Bienvenu, Camille Bourgaux, and Franccois Goasdoué. 2016. Explaining inconsistency-tolerant query answering over description logic knowledge bases Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI. 900--906. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. In Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. Vol. 3. 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Li Dong, Furu Wei, Ming Zhou, and Ke Xu. 2015. Question answering over Freebase with multi-column convolutional neural networks Proceedings of ACL&IJCNLP. 260--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Anthony Fader, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Oren Etzioni. 2014. Open question answering over curated and extracted knowledge bases Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD. 1156--1165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hanyin Fang, Fei Wu, Zhou Zhao, Xinyu Duan, Yueting Zhuang, and Martin Ester. 2016. Community-based question answering via heterogeneous social network learning Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI. 122--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Simone Filice, Danilo Croce, Alessandro Moschitti, and Roberto Basili. 2016. KeLP at SemEval-2016 Task 3: Learning semantic relations between questions and answers Proceedings of International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. 1116--1123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Marc Franco-Salvador, Sudipta Kar, Thamar Solorio, and Paolo Rosso. 2016. UH-PRHLT at SemEval-2016 Task 3: Combining lexical and semantic-based features for community question answering. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. 814--821.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jing He and Decheng Dai. 2011. Summarization of yes/no questions using a feature function model Proceedings of the 3rd ACML. 351--366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Xiaodong He and David Golub. 2016. Character-level question answering with attention. Proceedings of EMNLP. 1598--1607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cody Kwok, Oren Etzioni, and Daniel S. Weld. 2001. Scaling question answering to the web. In ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. Vol. 19. ACM, 242--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Vanessa Lopez, Andriy Nikolov, Marta Sabou, Victoria Uren, Enrico Motta, and Mathieu d'Aquin. 2010. Scaling up question-answering to linked data. In Proceedings of EKAM. 193--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Julian McAuley and Alex Yang. 2016. Addressing complex and subjective product-related queries with customer reviews Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on WWW. 625--635. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Samaneh Moghaddam and Martin Ester. 2011. AQA: aspect-based opinion question answering. In Workshop on Sentiment Elicitation from Natural Text for Information Retrieval and Extraction (SENTIRE) in IEEE 11th ICDM. 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Vinod Nair and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2009. Implicit mixtures of restricted Boltzmann machines Advances in NIPS. 1145--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Preslav Nakov, Lluís Màrquez, Walid Magdy, Alessandro Moschitti, Jim Glass, and Bilal Randeree. 2015. SemEval-2015 Task 3: Answer selection in community question answering Proceedings of International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. 269--281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Preslav Nakov, Lluís Màrquez, Alessandro Moschitti, Walid Magdy, Hamdy Mubarak, Abed Alhakim Freihat, Jim Glass, and Bilal Randeree. 2016. SemEval-2016 Task 3: Community question answering. Proceedings of International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. 525--545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Adi Omari, David Carmel, Oleg Rokhlenko, and Idan Szpektor. 2016. Novelty based ranking of human answers for community questions Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR. 215--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jay M. Ponte and W. Bruce Croft. 1998. A language modeling approach to information retrieval Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGIR. ACM, 275--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jinfeng Rao, Hua He, and Jimmy Lin. 2016. Noise-contrastive estimation for answer selection with deep neural networks Proceedings of the 25th ACM CIKM. 1913--1916. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Aliaksei Severyn and Alessandro Moschitti. 2015. Learning to rank short text pairs with convolutional deep neural networks Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR. 373--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hapnes Toba, Zhao-Yan Ming, Mirna Adriani, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2014. Discovering high quality answers in community question answering archives using a hierarchy of classifiers. In Information Sciences, Vol. Vol. 261. Elsevier, 101--115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Christina Unger, Lorenz Bühmann, Jens Lehmann, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Daniel Gerber, and Philipp Cimiano. 2012. Template-based question answering over RDF data. Proceedings of the 21st WWW. 639--648. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mengting Wan and Julian McAuley. 2016. Modeling ambiguity, subjectivity, and diverging viewpoints in opinion question answering systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICDM. 489--498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Linlin Wang, Kang Liu, Zhu Cao, Jun Zhao, and Gerard de Melo. 2015. Sentiment-Aspect Extraction based on Restricted Boltzmann Machines. Proceedings of ACL. 616--625.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Pengwei Wang, Lei Ji, Jun Yan, Lianwen Jin, and Wei Ying Ma. 2016. Learning to extract conditional knowledge for question answering using dialogue Proceedings of ACM CIKM. 277--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Xin-Jing Wang, Xudong Tu, Dan Feng, and Lei Zhang. 2009. Ranking community answers by modeling question-answer relationships via analogical reasoning. In Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR. 179--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kun Xu, Yansong Feng, Songfang Huang, and Dongyan Zhao. 2015. Question answering via phrasal semantic parsing. Proceedings of the 6th CLEF. 414--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Kun Xu, Siva Reddy, Yansong Feng, Songfang Huang, and Dongyan Zhao. 2016. Question answering on Freebase via relation extraction and textual evidence Proceedings of the 54th ACL. 2326--2336.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu Yang, Minghui Qiu, Swapna Gottipati, Feida Zhu, Jing Jiang, Huiping Sun, and Zhong Chen. 2013. Cqarank: jointly model topics and expertise in community question answering Proceedings of the 22nd ACM CIKM. 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Xuchen Yao and Benjamin Van Durme. 2014. Information extraction over structured data: question answering with Freebase. Proceedings of the 52th ACL. 956--966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Jun Yin, Xin Jiang, Zhengdong Lu, Lifeng Shang, Hang Li, and Xiaoming Li. 2016. Neural generative question answering. In Proceedings of the 25th IJCAI. 2972--2978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jianxing Yu, Zheng-Jun Zha, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2012. Answering opinion questions on products by exploiting hierarchical organization of consumer reviews. In Proceedings of EMNLP&CoNLL. 391--401. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Kai Zhang, Wei Wu, Fang Wang, Ming Zhou, and Zhoujun Li. 2016. Learning distributed representations of data in community question answering for question retrieval. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM WSDM. ACM, 533--542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wayne Xin Zhao, Jing Jiang, Hongfei Yan, and Xiaoming Li. 2010. Jointly modeling aspects and opinions with a MaxEnt-LDA hybrid Proceedings of EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 56--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Review-Aware Answer Prediction for Product-Related Questions Incorporating Aspects

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WSDM '18: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
      February 2018
      821 pages
      ISBN:9781450355810
      DOI:10.1145/3159652

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      WSDM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate81of514submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate498of2,863submissions,17%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader