skip to main content
10.1145/3160504.3160508acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Conceptual Framework to design Users Digital Legacy Management Systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Current computer systems facilitate interaction between users for various purposes, including the management of their Digital Legacy. The Digital Legacy of a user is formed by several items and virtual possessions that have some type of value (e.g., financial, affective or of another nature) to someone, for the individual himself/herslef or other stakeholders. Systems that aim to support the management of users' digital legacy cover a series of configurations with long-term effects, as well as implementing different ways of handling temporality of information and organizing the roles users can take. In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework to support the designers of Digital Legacy Management Systems (DLMS), by describing the dimensions that are relevant to these systems and the values they can take. The framework was proposed based on a systematic analysis of 6 Digital Legacy Management Systems, using the Semiotic Inspection Method in combination with the Interaction Anticipation Design Challenges. The preliminary evaluation of our framework yielded initial positive indicators about its use in the design of a DLMS prototype.

References

  1. M Cecília C Baranauskas, Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, and Roberto Pereira. 2012. GranDIHC-BR: prospecção de grandes desafios de pesquisa em interação humano-computador no Brasil. In Companion Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Brazilian Computer Society, 63--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Evan Carroll and John Romano. 2010. Your Digital Afterlife: When Facebook, Flickr and Twitter Are Your Estate, What's Your Legacy? Pearson Education. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=q8Ks6YIyhuEC Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Renata Mendes de Araujo, Rita Suzana Maciel, and Clodis Boscarioli. 2017. I GranDSI-BR -- Grandes Desafios de Pesquisa em Sistemas de Informação no Brasil 2016 a 2026. Relatório técnico, 67pg. ISBN 978-85-7669-359-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jaime de Oliveira, Luís Amaral, Luís Paulo Reis, and Brígida Mónica Faria. 2016. A Study on the Need of Digital Heritage Management Plataforms. In Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2016 11th Iberian Conference on. IEEE, 1--6. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7521505/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Clarisse. S. de Souza and Carla. F. Leitão. 2009. Semiotic Engineering Methods for Scientific Research in HCI. Morgan & Claypool, 1--122. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=6JCwq-CGRwAC Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Rebecca Gulotta, Aisling Kelliher, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2017. Digital Systems and the Experience of Legacy. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 663--674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rebecca Gulotta, William Odom, Jodi Forlizzi, and Haakon Faste. 2013. Digital Artifacts As Legacy: Exploring the Lifespan and Value of Digital Data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1813--1822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sue Jamison-Powell, Pam Briggs, Shaun Lawson, Conor Linehan, Karen Windle, and Harriet Gross. 2016. PS. I Love You: Understanding the Impact of Posthumous Digital Messages. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2920--2932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. William Jones, Victoria Bellotti, Robert Capra, Jesse David Dinneen, Gloria Mark, Catherine Marshall, Karyn Moffatt, Jaime Teevan, and Maximus Van Kleek. 2016. For Richer, for Poorer, in Sickness or in Health...: The Long-Term Management of Personal Information. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3508--3515. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lipeng Liu, Yongxiong Sun, Zhanwei Du, Rong Li, Yinghan Li, and Qiuyang Huang. 2014. MemoryRetrospect: Lifelogging with Social Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication (UbiComp '14 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 103--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Aron Daniel Lopes, Cristiano Maciel, and Vinícius Carvalho Pereira. 2014. Recomendações para o design de memórias digitais na Web Social. In Proceedings of the 13th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '14). Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 275--284. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2738055.2738099 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cristiano Maciel. 2011. Issues of the Social Web Interaction Project Faced with Afterlife Digital Legacy. In Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (IHC+CLIHC '11). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 3--12. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2254436.2254441 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cristiano Maciel and Vinicius Carvalho Pereira. 2015. Post-mortem Digital Legacy: Possibilities in HCI. In Human-Computer Interaction: Users and Contexts: 17th International Conference, HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 2-7, 2015, Proceedings, Part III, Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9171. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 339--349.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Michael Massimi and Ronald M. Baecker. 2011. Dealing with Death in Design: Developing Systems for the Bereaved. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1001--1010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. William Odom, John Zimmerman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Placelessness, Spacelessness, and Formlessness: Experiential Qualities of Virtual Possessions. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 985--994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fabrício Horácio Sales Pereira. 2017. Investigação sobre Antecipação dos Impactos da Interação em Sistemas de Gerência de Legado Digital de Usuários. Master's thesis. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil. https://www.dcc.ufmg.br/pos/cursos/mestrado.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Fabrício H. S. Pereira, Raquel O. Prates, Cristiano Maciel, and Vinicius Pereira. 2016b. Análise de Interação Antecipada e Aspectos Volitivos em Sistemas de Comunicação Digital Póstuma. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '15). São Paulo, Brazil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Vinicius Pereira, Cristiano Maciel, and Carla Leitão. 2016a. Design de memoriais digitais: pontos de apoio à comunicação multicultural a partir da análise semiótica de túmulos. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '15). São Paulo, Brazil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniela Petrelli, Elise van den Hoven, and Steve Whittaker. 2009. Making History: Intentional Capture of Future Memories. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1723--1732. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Raquel O. Prates, MaryBeth Rosson, and Clarisse S. de Souza. 2015a. Interaction Anticipation: Communicating Impacts of Groupware Configuration Settings to Users. In End-User Development, Paloma Díaz, Volkmar Pipek, Carmelo Ardito, Carlos Jensen, Ignacio Aedo, and Alexander Boden (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9083. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 192--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Raquel O. Prates, MaryBeth Rosson, and Clarisse S. de Souza. 2015b. Making Decisions About Digital Legacy with Google's Inactive Account Manager. In Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2015: 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Bamberg, Germany, September 14-18, 2015, Proceedings, Part I, Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Mirko Fetter, Tom Gross, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9296. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 201--209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Raquel O. Prates, MaryBeth Rosson, and Clarisse S. de Souza. 2016. Analysis of Configuration Decision Space Over Time: The Google Inactive Manager Account Case. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '15). São Paulo, Brazil. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Conceptual Framework to design Users Digital Legacy Management Systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '17: Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2017
      622 pages
      ISBN:9781450363778
      DOI:10.1145/3160504

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      IHC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate66of184submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader