skip to main content
10.1145/3164541.3164579acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

IT Students' Sentiment of Faculty Evaluations and Posting Opinions on Social Media Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 January 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer mediated communication (CMC) applications are widely used in academic field. Students have considerably usage of CMC applications in several applications including learning and social communication. social media networks are commonly used in student's daily life, A few studies focused on exploiting students' opinions on social media networks about their lecturers' performance and courses quality. This study investigated students' evaluations criterion for lecturers and courses within Malaysian educational institute (UNIKL), and their perspectives for using social networks as a platform for posting opinions related to how good are the lecturers and courses. The findings showed that students tend to be conservative towards revealing opinion online regarding their lecturers and courses. This may show that social network still found outside world that cannot be used to discuss opinions regarding lecturers' performance and courses quality.

References

  1. Brown, Stephen. "From VLEs to learning webs: the implications of Web 2.0 for learning and teaching." Interactive Learning Environments 18.1 (2010): 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Katz, Elihu, Jay G. Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch. "The uses and gratifications approach to mass communication." Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Pubns (1974).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hemmi, Akiko, Sian Bayne, and Ray Land. "The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education." Journal of computer assisted learning 25.1 (2009): 19--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lau, Wilfred WF. "Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students." Computers in Human Behavior 68 (2017): 286--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Schroeder, Andreas, Shailey Minocha, and Christoph Schneider. "The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning." Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26.3 (2010): 159--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Doolan, Martina A., and Theo Gilbert. "Student Choice: Blends of Technology Beyond the University to Support Social Interaction and Social Participation in Learning." E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training: Third International Conference, eLEOT 2016, Dublin, Ireland, August 31-September 2, 2016, Revised Selected Papers. Springer International Publishing, 2017Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ifinedo, Princely, and Princely Ifinedo. "Students' perceived impact of learning and satisfaction with blogs." The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 34.4 (2017): 322--337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Vrocharidou, Anatoli, and Ilias Efthymiou. "Computer mediated communication for social and academic purposes: Profiles of use and university students' gratifications." Computers & Education 58.1 (2012): 609--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Stark, Philip B., and Richard Freishtat. "An evaluation of course evaluations." ScienceOpen Research 9 (2014): 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang, Minjuan, and Myunghee Kang. "Cybergogy for engaged learning: A framework for creating learner engagement through information and communication technology." Engaged learning with emerging technologies(2006): 225--253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ahmadi, Mohammad, Marilyn M. Helms, and Farhad Raiszadeh. "Business students' perceptions of faculty evaluations." International Journal of Educational Management 15.1 (2001): 12--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Braskamp, Larry A., and John C. Ory. Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Inc., 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Centra, John A. "Will teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less course work?." Research in Higher Education 44.5 (2003): 495--518. 44(5), 495--518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Centra, John A. Reflective Faculty Evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Inc., 350 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Overall, John U., and Herbert W. Marsh. "Students' evaluations of instruction: A longitudinal study of their stability." Journal of Educational Psychology 72.3 (1980): 321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Wachtel, Howard K. "Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review." Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23.2 (1998): 191--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Feldman, Kenneth A. "Consistency and variability among college students in rating their teachers and courses: A review and analysis." Research in Higher Education 6.3 (1977): 223--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Marsh, Herbert W. "The influence of student, course, and instructor characteristics in evaluations of university teaching." American Educational Research Journal 17.2 (1980): 219--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Flaherty, C. "Bias against female instructors." Inside Higher Ed(2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitri, Triyani Arita. "Using Social Networks: Facebook Usage at the Riau College Students." Procedia Computer Science 59 (2015): 559--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lim, Jieun, and Jennifer C. Richardson. "Exploring the effects of students' social networking experience on social presence and perceptions of using SNSs for educational purposes." The Internet and Higher Education 29 (2016): 31--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Fitri, Triyani Arita. "Using Social Networks: Facebook Usage at the Riau College Students." Procedia Computer Science 59 (2015): 559--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Niklasson, Claes. "Reflections on student opinions before and after the final exam-The variability of questionnaires." 3: e Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges ingenjörsutbildningar; 30 november-1 december; Campus Norrköping; Linköpings universitet. No. 075. Linköping University Electronic Press, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Altrabsheh, Nabeela. Sentiment analysis on students' real-time feedback. Diss. University of Portsmouth, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Bulmer, Michael George. Principles of statistics. Courier Corporation, 1979...Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Cramer, D. "Basic Statistics for Social Research: Step-bv-step Calculations and Computer Techniques using Minitab." (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Aborujilah, Abdulaziz, et al. "Lecturers' perception on social media networks uses in education." Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication. ACM, 2017.. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Legaree, Blaine A. "Considering the changing face of social media in higher education." FEMS microbiology letters 362.16 (2015): fnv128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Hamid, Suraya, et al. "Understanding students' perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning." The Internet and Higher Education 26 (2015): 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. IT Students' Sentiment of Faculty Evaluations and Posting Opinions on Social Media Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IMCOM '18: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
        January 2018
        628 pages
        ISBN:9781450363853
        DOI:10.1145/3164541

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 January 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        IMCOM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate100of255submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate213of621submissions,34%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader