skip to main content
10.1145/3170358.3170401acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Classroom size, activity and attendance: scaling up drivers of learning space occupation

Published:07 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Teaching face-to-face is still a major education mode in many universities, yet institutions are increasingly tasked with improving efficient use of teaching spaces. This need to understand space use can be coupled with learning and teaching data to better inform student attendance and subsequently participation. Here, we analyse thermal sensor data used to monitor traffic into classrooms; these data are associated with the timetable to provide knowledge of the course and the teaching mode (such as lecture, tutorial or workshop). Further, we integrate these traffic data with student feedback data to investigate the drivers of student attendance patterns, and aim to also include online activity and behaviour to develop broad models of both room occupancy and student attendance. Combining space utilisation data with information on teaching modality and in-class and out-of-class participation can inform on how to both improve learning and design effective and efficient teaching spaces.

References

  1. V. Alexander and R.E. Hicks. 2015. Does class attendance predict academic performance in first year psychology tutorials? International Journal of Psychological Studies 8, 1 (2015), 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. T. Anderson, C. Whittington, and X.J. Li. 2016. AAEE2016 CONFERENCE Classes to passes: Is class attendance a determinant of grades in undergraduate engineering subjects? (12 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. W. Arulampalam, R.A. Naylor, and J. Smith. 2012. Am I missing something? The effects of absence from class on student performance. Economics of Education Review 31, 4 (2012), 363--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S.B. Berenson, G. Carter, and K.S. Norwood. 1992. The At-Risk Student in College Developmental Algebra. School Science and Mathematics 92, 2 (1992), 55--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Billings-Gagliardi and K.M. Mazor. 2007. Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter? Academic Medicine 82, 10 (2007), S73--S76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Chen, Y. Li, and J. Song. 2013. Review on the Sensor Technology Applied in the Intelligent Learning Environment. Communications and Network 5 (2013), 69--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. T. Clay and L. Breslow. 2006. Why students don't attend class. Available from: http://www.web.mit.edu/fnl 184 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D.H. Cohall and D. Skeete. 2012. The impact of an attendance policy on the academic performance of first year medical students taking the Fundamentals of Disease and Treatment course. The Caribbean Teaching Scholar 2, 2 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Scottish Funding Council. 2006. Spaces for learning: a review of learning spaces in further and higher education. A report for the Scottish Funding Council prepared by AMA Alexi Marmot Associates in association with haa design (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Ferguson, T. Hoel, M. Scheffel, and H. Drachsler. 2016. Guest editorial: Ethics and privacy in learning analytics. Journal of learning analytics 3, 1 (2016), 5--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. Gul, M. Asif, S. Ahmad, M. Yasir, M. Majid, and M.S. Arshad. 2017. A Survey on Role of Internet of Things in Education. IJCSNS 17, 5 (2017), 159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S.H. Jameel and A. Hamdan. 2015. Effects of student's attendance on accounting student's performance. International Journal of Business and Management Review 3, 5 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. JISC. 2006. Designing spaces for effective learning: A guide to 21st century learning space design. HEFCE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Martinez-Maldonado, V. Echeverria, K. Yacef, A.D.P. Dos Santos, and M. Pechenizkiy. 2017. How to capitalise on mobility, proximity and motion analytics to support formal and informal education?. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Cross-LAK 2017, Vol. 1828. 39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Moore, C. Armstrong, and J. Pearson. 2008. Lecture absenteeism among students in higher education: a valuable route to understanding student motivation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 30, 1 (2008), 15--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Neary, A. Harrison, G. Crellin, N. Parekh, G. Saunders, F. Duggan, S. Williams, and S. Austin. 2010. Learning landscapes in higher education. Centre for Educational Research and Development, University of Lincoln. Retrieved May 2 (2010), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D.G. Oblinger et al. 2006. Space as a change agent. Learning spaces 1 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Paisey and N.J. Paisey. 2004. Student attendance in an accounting module-reasons for non-attendance and the effect on academic performance at a Scottish University. Accounting education 13, sup1 (2004), 39--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. K.H. Park and P.M. Kerr. 1990. Determinants of academic performance: A multinomial logit approach. The Journal of Economic Education 21, 2 (1990), 101--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Schmulian and S. Coetzee. 2011. Class absenteeism: reasons for non-attendance and the effect on academic performance. Accounting Research Journal 24, 2 (2011), 178--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. N. Sclater. 2014. Learning analytics: The current state of play in UK higher and further education. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. HEFCE SMG. 2006. Higher Education Funding Council for England, Space Management Group: Phase One and Two Reports. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. P. Temple and R. Barnett. 2007. Higher education space: Future directions. Planning for Higher Education 36, 1 (2007), 5--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. V.L. Uskov, J.P. Bakken, A. Pandey, U. Singh, M. Yalamanchili, and A. Penumatsa. 2016. Smart University Taxonomy: Features, Components, Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Classroom size, activity and attendance: scaling up drivers of learning space occupation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          LAK '18: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
          March 2018
          489 pages
          ISBN:9781450364003
          DOI:10.1145/3170358

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 March 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          LAK '18 Paper Acceptance Rate35of115submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader