skip to main content
10.1145/3171221.3171270acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design Methodology for the UX of HRI: A Field Study of a Commercial Social Robot at an Airport

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research in robotics and human-robot interaction is becoming more and more mature. Additionally, more affordable social robots are being released commercially. Thus, industry is currently demanding ideas for viable commercial applications to situate social robots in public spaces and enhance customers experience. However, present literature in human-robot interaction does not provide a clear set of guidelines and a methodology to (i) identify commercial applications for robotic platforms able to position the users» needs at the centre of the discussion and (ii) ensure the creation of a positive user experience. With this paper we propose to fill this gap by providing a methodology for the design of robotic applications including these desired features, suitable for integration by researchers, industry, business and government organisations. As we will show in this paper, we successfully employed this methodology for an exploratory field study involving the trial implementation of a commercially available, social humanoid robot at an airport.

References

  1. Pekka Abrahamsson, Outi Salo, Jussi Ronkainen, and Juhani Warsta. 2002. Agile software development methods: Review and analysis. VTT publications 478 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lauralee Alben. 1996. Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design. interactions, Vol. 3, 3 (1996), 11--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Beatrice Alenljung, Rebecca Andreasson, Erik A. Billing, Jessica Lindblom, and Robert Lowe. 2017. User Experience of Conveying Emotions by Touch. In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) Lisbon, Portugal, Aug 28-Sept 1, 2017. IEEE, 1240--1247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Shiri Azenkot, Catherine Feng, and Maya Cakmak. 2016. Enabling building service robots to guide blind people a participatory design approach Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Paul Baxter, James Kennedy, Emmanuel Senft, Severin Lemaignan, and Tony Belpaeme. 2016. From characterising three years of HRI to methodology and reporting recommendations Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 391--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Niklas Beuter, Thorsten Spexard, Ingo Lutkebohle, Julia Peltason, and Franz Kummert. 2008. Where is this?-gesture based multimodal interaction with an anthropomorphic robot Humanoid Robots, 2008. Humanoids 2008. 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on. IEEE, 585--591.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tim Brown. 2009. Change by design. Collins Business.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Maartje de Graaf and Somaya Ben Allouch. 2014. Expectation setting and personality attribution in hri Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 144--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Maartje M.A. de Graaf and Somaya Ben Allouch. 2013. Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems Vol. 61, 12 (2013), 1476 -- 1486. 1007/978--3--319--70022--9_50 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Katja Tschimmel. 2012. Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation ISPIM Conference Proceedings. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jonathan Vitale, Meg Tonkin, Sarita Herse, Suman Ojha, Jesse Clark, Mary-Anne Williams, Xun Wang, and William Judge. 2018. Be More Transparent and Users Will Like You: A Robot Privacy and User Experience Design Experiment. In Proceedings of 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, Chicago, IL, USA, March 5--8, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jonathan Vitale, Meg Tonkin, Xun Wang, Suman Ojha, Mary-Anne Williams, and William Judge. 2017. Privacy by Design in Machine Learning Data Collection: A User Experience Experimentation Symposium on Designing the User Experience of Machine Learning Systems. AAAI Spring Symposia 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Michael L. Walters, Dag S. Syrdal, Kerstin Dautenhahn, René Te Boekhorst, and Kheng Lee Koay. 2008. Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Autonomous Robots, Vol. 24, 2 (2008), 159--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Astrid Weiss, Regina Bernhaupt, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2011. The USUS evaluation framework for user-centered HRI. New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction Vol. 2 (2011), 89--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Astrid Weiss, Regina Bernhaupt, Manfred Tscheligi, and Eiichi Yoshida. 2009. Addressing user experience and societal impact in a user study with a humanoid robot AISB2009: Proceedings of the Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction (Edinburgh, 8--9 April 2009), SSAISB. 150--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sarah Woods, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Christina Kaouri. 2005. Is someone watching me--consideration of social facilitation effects in human-robot interaction experiments. In Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, 2005. CIRA 2005. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 53--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design Methodology for the UX of HRI: A Field Study of a Commercial Social Robot at an Airport

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
          February 2018
          468 pages
          ISBN:9781450349536
          DOI:10.1145/3171221

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 February 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate49of206submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader