ABSTRACT
Research in robotics and human-robot interaction is becoming more and more mature. Additionally, more affordable social robots are being released commercially. Thus, industry is currently demanding ideas for viable commercial applications to situate social robots in public spaces and enhance customers experience. However, present literature in human-robot interaction does not provide a clear set of guidelines and a methodology to (i) identify commercial applications for robotic platforms able to position the users» needs at the centre of the discussion and (ii) ensure the creation of a positive user experience. With this paper we propose to fill this gap by providing a methodology for the design of robotic applications including these desired features, suitable for integration by researchers, industry, business and government organisations. As we will show in this paper, we successfully employed this methodology for an exploratory field study involving the trial implementation of a commercially available, social humanoid robot at an airport.
- Pekka Abrahamsson, Outi Salo, Jussi Ronkainen, and Juhani Warsta. 2002. Agile software development methods: Review and analysis. VTT publications 478 (2002).Google Scholar
- Lauralee Alben. 1996. Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design. interactions, Vol. 3, 3 (1996), 11--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beatrice Alenljung, Rebecca Andreasson, Erik A. Billing, Jessica Lindblom, and Robert Lowe. 2017. User Experience of Conveying Emotions by Touch. In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) Lisbon, Portugal, Aug 28-Sept 1, 2017. IEEE, 1240--1247.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shiri Azenkot, Catherine Feng, and Maya Cakmak. 2016. Enabling building service robots to guide blind people a participatory design approach Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 3--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Baxter, James Kennedy, Emmanuel Senft, Severin Lemaignan, and Tony Belpaeme. 2016. From characterising three years of HRI to methodology and reporting recommendations Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 391--398. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Niklas Beuter, Thorsten Spexard, Ingo Lutkebohle, Julia Peltason, and Franz Kummert. 2008. Where is this?-gesture based multimodal interaction with an anthropomorphic robot Humanoid Robots, 2008. Humanoids 2008. 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on. IEEE, 585--591.Google Scholar
- Tim Brown. 2009. Change by design. Collins Business.Google Scholar
- Maartje de Graaf and Somaya Ben Allouch. 2014. Expectation setting and personality attribution in hri Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 144--145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maartje M.A. de Graaf and Somaya Ben Allouch. 2013. Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems Vol. 61, 12 (2013), 1476 -- 1486. 1007/978--3--319--70022--9_50 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katja Tschimmel. 2012. Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation ISPIM Conference Proceedings. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), 1.Google Scholar
- Jonathan Vitale, Meg Tonkin, Sarita Herse, Suman Ojha, Jesse Clark, Mary-Anne Williams, Xun Wang, and William Judge. 2018. Be More Transparent and Users Will Like You: A Robot Privacy and User Experience Design Experiment. In Proceedings of 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, Chicago, IL, USA, March 5--8, 2018. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Vitale, Meg Tonkin, Xun Wang, Suman Ojha, Mary-Anne Williams, and William Judge. 2017. Privacy by Design in Machine Learning Data Collection: A User Experience Experimentation Symposium on Designing the User Experience of Machine Learning Systems. AAAI Spring Symposia 2017.Google Scholar
- Michael L. Walters, Dag S. Syrdal, Kerstin Dautenhahn, René Te Boekhorst, and Kheng Lee Koay. 2008. Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Autonomous Robots, Vol. 24, 2 (2008), 159--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Astrid Weiss, Regina Bernhaupt, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2011. The USUS evaluation framework for user-centered HRI. New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction Vol. 2 (2011), 89--110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Astrid Weiss, Regina Bernhaupt, Manfred Tscheligi, and Eiichi Yoshida. 2009. Addressing user experience and societal impact in a user study with a humanoid robot AISB2009: Proceedings of the Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction (Edinburgh, 8--9 April 2009), SSAISB. 150--157.Google Scholar
- Sarah Woods, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Christina Kaouri. 2005. Is someone watching me--consideration of social facilitation effects in human-robot interaction experiments. In Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, 2005. CIRA 2005. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 53--60.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Design Methodology for the UX of HRI: A Field Study of a Commercial Social Robot at an Airport
Recommendations
IVO Robot: A New Social Robot for Human-Robot Collaboration
HRI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionWe present a new social robot named IVO, a robot capable of collaborating with humans and solving different tasks. The robot is intended to cooperate and work with humans in a useful and socially acceptable manner to serve as a research platform for ...
A survey on the design and evolution of social robots — Past, present and future
AbstractDespite the relatively young age of Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) as a field, there is a large volume of research on advances in robot hardware, software and behavior. The goal of this article is to survey trends in social robot design,...
Highlights- Analyzed over 9000 research papers and examined 344 social robots from literature in great detail.
A Novel Concept of Human-Robot Competition for Evaluating a Robot's Reasoning Capabilities in HRI
HRI '16: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot InteractionFor intelligent Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), a robot should be equipped with some core reasoning capabilities such as perspective taking, effort analysis, and affordance analysis. This paper starts to explore how a robot equipped with such reasoning ...
Comments