skip to main content
10.1145/3173386.3176904acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Reducing Stress by Bonding with a Social Robot: Towards Autonomous Long-Term Child-Robot Interaction

Published:01 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Pediatric oncology patients could benefit from bonding with a social robot and talking about their day in the hospital. With our research we aim to contribute to the development of a robot that is able to facilitate a child-robot bond autonomously and long-term. We propose to use robot-disclosure and a shared interaction history to create a child-robot bond where the child feels comfortable and familiar enough to talk about their day with the robot.

References

  1. Minoo Alemi, Ashkan Ghanbarzadeh, Ali Meghdari, and Leila Jafari Moghadam. 2016. Clinical Application of a Humanoid Robot in Pediatric Cancer Interventions. International Journal of Social Robotics 8, 5 (01 Nov 2016), p743--759.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Irwin Altman and Dalmas A Taylor. 1973. Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. https://doi.org/ 1973--28661-000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Paul Baxter, Tony Belpaeme, Lola Casamero, Piero Cosi, Yiannis Demiris, and Valentin Enescu. 2011. Long-term human-robot interaction with young users. In in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Human-Robot Interaction conference (HRI-2011) (Robots with Children Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tony Belpaeme, Paul Baxter, Joachim de Greeff, James Kennedy, Robin Read, Rosemarijn Looije, Mark Neerincx, Ilaria Baroni, and Mattia Coti Zelati. 2013. Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges. Springer International Publishing, Cham, p452--459. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Franziska Burger, Joost Broekens, and Mark A. Neerincx. 2017. Fostering Relatedness Between Children and Virtual Agents Through Reciprocal Self-disclosure. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 137--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sooyeon Jeong, Deirdre E. Logan, Matthew S. Goodwin, Suzanne Graca, Brianna O'Connell, Honey Goodenough, Laurel Anderson, Nicole Stenquist, Katie Fitzpatrick, Miriam Zisook, Luke Plummer, Cynthia Breazeal, and Peter Weinstock. 2015. A Social Robot to Mitigate Stress, Anxiety, and Pain in Hospital Pediatric Care. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts (HRI'15 Extended Abstracts). ACM, New York, NY, USA, p103--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anne E. Kazak, Annah N. Abrams, Jaime Banks, Jennifer Christofferson, Stephen DiDonato, Martha A. Grootenhuis, Marianne Kabour, Avi Madan-Swain, Sunita K. Patel, Sima Zadeh, and Mary Jo Kupst. 2015. Psychosocial Assessment as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 62, S5 (2015), p426--459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová, Elettra Oleari, Anahita Bagherzadhalimi, Francesca Sacchitelli, Bernd Kiefer, Stefania Racioppa, Clara Pozzi, and Alberto Sanna. 2015. Young Users? Perception of a Social Robot Displaying Familiarity and Eliciting Disclosure. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 380--389.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mike Ligthart, Koen Hindriks, and Mark A. Neerinxc. In Press. Co-designing a Social Robot for Children with a Health Condition. In Int. Sym. on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (Mutually Shaping HRI workshop). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Esther J.G. van der Drift, Robbert-Jan Beun, Rosemarijn Looije, Olivier A. Blanson Henkemans, and Mark A. Neerincx. 2014. A Remote Social Robot to Motivate and Support Diabetic Children in Keeping a Diary. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 463--470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reducing Stress by Bonding with a Social Robot: Towards Autonomous Long-Term Child-Robot Interaction

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
          March 2018
          431 pages
          ISBN:9781450356152
          DOI:10.1145/3173386

          Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 March 2018

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate49of206submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate192of519submissions,37%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader