skip to main content
10.1145/3173386.3176921acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract
Public Access

Efficient Human-Robot Interaction for Robust Autonomy in Task Execution

Published:01 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Robust autonomy can be achieved with learning frameworks that refine robot operating procedures through guidance from human domain experts. This work explores three capabilities required to implement efficient learning for robust autonomy: (1) identifying when to garner human input during task execution, (2) using active learning to curate what guidance is received, and (3) evaluating the tradeoff between operator availability and guidance fidelity when deciding who to enlist for guidance. We present results from completed work on interruptibility classification of collocated people that can be used to help in evaluating the tradeoff in (3).

References

  1. Siddhartha Banerjee and Sonia Chernova. 2017. Temporal Models for Robot Classification of Human Interruptibility. In AAMAS. 1350--1359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sonia Chernova and Andrea L. Thomaz. 2014. Robot Learning from Human Teachers. Vol. 8. 1--121 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sonia Chernova and Manuela Veloso. 2007. Confidence-based policy learning from demonstration using Gaussian mixture models. In AAMAS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Vivian Chu, Tesca Fitzgerald, and Andrea L Thomaz. 2016. Learning object affordances by leveraging the combination of human-guidance and self-exploration. In HRI. IEEE Press, 221--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sébastien Forestier, Yoan Mollard, and Pierre-Yves Oudeyer. 2017. Intrinsically Motivated Goal Exploration Processes with Automatic Curriculum Learning. (aug 2017). arXiv:1708.02190Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Constantine Lignos, Vasumathi Raman, Cameron Finucane, Mitchell Marcus, and Hadas Kress-Gazit. 2014. Provably correct reactive control from natural language. Autonomous Robots 38, 1 (2014), 89--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Mollaret, A.A. Mekonnen, F. Lerasle, I. Ferrané, J. Pinquier, B. Boudet, and P. Rumeau. 2016. A multi-modal perception based assistive robotic system for the elderly. Computer Vision and Image Understanding (mar 2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Louis-Philippe Morency, Ariadna Quattoni, and Trevor Darrell. 2007. LatentDynamic Discriminative Models for Continuous Gesture Recognition. In CVPR. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Liam D. Turner, Stuart M. Allen, and Roger M. Whitaker. 2015. Interruptibility prediction for ubiquitous systems. In UbiComp. ACM Press, 801--812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient Human-Robot Interaction for Robust Autonomy in Task Execution

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2018
      431 pages
      ISBN:9781450356152
      DOI:10.1145/3173386

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 March 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate49of206submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate192of519submissions,37%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader