skip to main content
10.1145/3173386.3176997acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract
Public Access

USAFA Robot Deathmatch: The Use of Robots to Model the System Engineering Process

Published:01 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

With robot technologies becoming more readily available in classroom settings, we integrated a three week project using commercially available robots as prototyping kickoff project for their year long System Engineering (SE) capstone course. As part of this undergraduate class, students assembled and programmed robots in four teams to compete against each other in the 'Robot Deathmatch Competition'. They were given real-world requirements, customers, materials, and deadlines to prepare them for larger scale projects. The project integrated lessons from previously taught courses into a condensed technology-inclusive experience and set students on a successful path for their upcoming year long projects.

References

  1. JE Bartolomei, SL Turner, and CA Fischer. 2004. Using the Systems Engineering Method to Design a System Engineering Major at the United States Air Force Academy. age 9 (2004), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cory A. Cooper, Jeremy J. Homan, and Brian E. Tidball. 2017. Integrating systems engineering students in capstones; a multi-spectrum characterization of interdisciplinary capstones. 15th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research Disciplinary Convergence: Implications for Systems Engineering Research (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jodi Forlizzi and Carl DiSalvo. 2006. Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 258--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Victoria Groom, Leila Takayama, Paloma Ochi, and Clifford Nass. 2009. I am my robot: the impact of robot-building and robot form on operators. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. ACM, 31--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. David Hanson. 2006. Exploring the aesthetic range for humanoid robots. In Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium: Toward social mechanisms of android science. 39--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kerstin S. Haring, Katsumi Watanabe, Mari Velonaki, Chad Tossell, and Victor Finomore. 2017. FFAB -- The Form Function Attribution Bias inHuman-Robot Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lixiao Huang, Terri Varnado, and Douglas Gillan. 2013. An exploration of robot builders' attachment to their LEGO robots. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 57. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1825--1829.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ja-Young Sung, Lan Guo, Rebecca Grinter, and Henrik Christensen. 2007. 'My Roomba is Rambo': intimate home appliances. UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing (2007), 145--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. USAFA Robot Deathmatch: The Use of Robots to Model the System Engineering Process

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
          March 2018
          431 pages
          ISBN:9781450356152
          DOI:10.1145/3173386

          Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 March 2018

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate49of206submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate192of519submissions,37%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader