skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173734acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Intermodulation: Improvisation and Collaborative Art Practice for HCI

Published:19 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper integrates theory, ethnography, and collaborative artwork to explore improvisational activity as both topic and tool of multidisciplinary HCI inquiry. Building on theories of improvisation drawn from art, music, HCI and social science, and two ethnographic studies based on interviews, participant observation and collaborative art practice, we seek to elucidate the improvisational nature of practice in both art and ordinary action, including human-computer interaction. We identify five key features of improvisational action -- reflexivity, transgression, tension, listening, and interdependence -- and show how these can deepen and extend both linear and open-ended methodologies in HCI and design. We conclude by highlighting collaborative engagement based on 'intermodulation' as a tool of multidisciplinary inquiry for HCI research and design.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn2076-file5.mp4

mp4

28.6 MB

pn2076.mp4

mp4

344.7 MB

References

  1. Philip E Agre, and David Chapman. 1987. Pengi: lementation of a Theory of Activity. aaai.org. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Philip E Agre. 1997. Computation and Human Experience. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Peter Dalsgaard, Shad Gross, and Kim Halskov. 2016. Documenting the Research Through Design Process. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16, 96--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2015. Immodest Proposals. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 2093--2102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Estelle Barrett and Barbara Bolt. 2007. Practice as research: approaches to creative arts enquiry.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, Boriana Koleva, Stefan Rennick Egglestone, Gabriella Giannachi, Matt Adams, Nick Tandavanitj, and Ju Row Farr. 2013. Performance-Led Research in the Wild. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 3: 14:1--14:22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Paul Berliner. 1994. Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Wiebe E Bijker, Thomas P Hughes, Trevor Pinch, and Deborah G Douglas. 2012. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J Bowers. 2002. Improvising machines: Ethnographically informed design for improvised electro-acoustic music. ARiADATexts (4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. John Bowers, Robyn Taylor, Jonathan Hook, Dustin Freeman, Charlie Bramley, and Christopher Newell. 2014. HCI: human-computer improvisation. In Proceedings of the 2014 companion publication on Designing interactive systems, 203--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 1John Cage. 1952. 4'33''(Four thirty-three).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. John Cage and David Tudor. 1959. Indeterminacy: New Aspect of Form in Instrumental and Electronic Music: Reading. Folkways Records.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kathy Charmaz and Linda Liska Belgrave. 2007. Grounded theory. Wiley Online Library.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Taylan Cihan. 2013. Blister. https://vimeo.com/56305601Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Peter Dalsgaard and Peter. 2016. Experimental Systems in Research through Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 4991--4996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Paul Dourish, Annette Adler, and Brian Cantwell Smith. 1996. Organising User Interfaces Around Reflective Accounts. In Reflection'96, 235--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ernest A. Edmonds, Alastair Weakley, Linda Candy, Mark Fell, Roger Knott, and Sandra Pauletto. 2005. The studio as laboratory: Combining creative practice and digital technology research. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 63, 4--5 SPEC. ISS.: 452--481. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ernest Edmonds and Linda Candy. 2002. Creativity, art practice, and knowledge. Communications of the ACM 45, 10: 91--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Bill Evans. 1957. Improvisation in Jazz. Kind of Blue.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Bill Evans and Jim Hall. 1966. Intermodulation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 2SM Feisst. 2009. John Cage and improvisation: an unresolved relationship. Musical improvisation: Art, education, and society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 2Bill Gaver and John Bowers. 2012. Annotated portfolios. interactions 19, 4: 40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. William Gaver and William. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12, 937. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Elizabeth Gerber and Elizabeth. 2007. Improvisation principles and techniques for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '07, 1069. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Elisa Giaccardi and Gerhard Fischer. 2008. Creativity and evolution: a metadesign perspective. Digital Creativity 19, March 2015: 19--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hermann Gottschewski. 2007. The Provisum and the Improvisum in Musical Performance. Yonsei Music Research 14: 13--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Guy Hoffman and Gil Weinberg. 2010. Gesture-based human-robot jazz improvisation. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, 582--587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir Holmer, Carl Disalvo, Phoebe Sengers, and Thomas Lodato. 2015. Constructing and constraining participation in participatory arts and HCI. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 74: 107--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jonathan Hook, Guy Schofield, Robyn Taylor, Tom Bartindale, John McCarthy, and Peter Wright. 2012. Exploring HCI's relationship with liveness. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts - CHI EA '12, 2771. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kristina Höök, Peter Dalsgaard, Stuart Reeves, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jonas Löwgren, Erik Stolterman, and Yvonne Rogers. 2015. Knowledge Production in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '15, 2429--2432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 3Steven J. Jackson and Laewoo Kang. 2014. Breakdown, obsolescence and reuse. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, 449--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. 3Giulio Jacucci, Mira Wagner, Ina Wagner, Elisa Giaccardi, Mauro Annunziato, Nell Breyer, Jonas Hansen, Kazuhiro Jo, Stijn Ossevoort, Alessandro Perini, Natacha Roussel, and Susanne Schuricht. 2010. ParticipArt: Exploring participation in interactive art installations. In 9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2010: Arts, Media, and Humanities, ISMAR-AMH 2010 - Proceedings, 3--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. 3P.a Jennings, E.b Giaccardi, and M.c Wesolkowska. 2006. About face interface: Creative engagement in the new media arts and HCI. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings: 1663--1666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Laewoo (Leo) Kang. 2016. Breaking AndyWall: Transgressive and Playful Exploration on the Dynamic Role of Users in Art and Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16), 3855--3858. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Laewoo (Leo) Kang. 2018. Intermodulator: interactive audio-visual system for collaborative improvisation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Laewoo (Leo) Kang. 2017. Echo (): Listening to the Reflection of Obsolete Technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, 305--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. 3Scott Barry Kaufman and Carolyn Gregoire. 2016. Wired to create: Unraveling the mysteries of the creative mind. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. 3Nathaniel Klemp, Ray Mcdermott, and Jason Raley. 2008. Plans, Takes, and Mistakes. Critical Social Studies, 1: 4--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. 3Don Koberg. 1981. The all new universal traveler: A soft-systems guide to creativity, problem-solving, and the process of reaching goals. William Kaufmann Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. A. Baki Kocaballi and Yeliz Yorulmaz. 2016. Performative Photography as an Ideation Method. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16, 1083--1095. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. 4Patricia Leavy. 2010. Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 10, 1: 76--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. 4George E. Lewis and Benjamin Piekut. 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Critical Improvisation Studies, Volume 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. 4John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2004. Technology as experience. interactions 11, 5: 42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. 4Timothy J. (Timothy James) McGee. 2003. Improvisation in the arts of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. 4Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books (AZ).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. 4T Nunn. 1998. Wisdom of the Impulse On the Nature of Musical Free Improvisation Part 2. Pdf julkaisu International Improvised Music Archive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. 4William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Youn-kyung Lim, Audrey Desjardins, Bart Hengeveld, and Richard Banks. 2016. From Research Prototype to Research Product. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. 4Nam June Paik. 1965. Zen for Film.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. 4Nam June Paik. 1969. Participation TV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. J Pressing. 1988. Improvisation: methods and models. John A. Sloboda (Hg.): Generative processes in.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. 5Geber Ramalho and Jean-Gabriel Ganascia. 1994. Simulating creativity in jazz performance. In AAAI, 108--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. 5Matt Ratto. 2011. Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life. The Information Society 27, 4: 252--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. 5Horst W J Rittel and Melvin M Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4, 2: 155--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. 5Francis. Rumsey and Tim. McCormick. 2006. Sound and recording: an introduction. Focal Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. 5R. K. Sawyer. 2006. Group creativity: musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music 34, 2: 148--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. 5R. Keith Sawyer. 2000. Improvisation and the Creative Process: Dewey, Collingwood, and the Aesthetics of Spontaneity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58, 2: 149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. 5R. Keith (Robert Keith) Sawyer. 2011. Structure and improvisation in creative teaching. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. 5Lucy Suchman. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press: 224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. 5John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '07, Paper 41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. John Zimmerman, Erik Stolterman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. An analysis and critique of Research through Design. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '10, 310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. 6Adversarial Design. Retrieved September 17, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2341007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. 6Festival de Cannes: The Mystery of Picasso (In Competition). festival-cannes.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. 6Critical Studies in Improvisation. http://www.criticalimprov.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. 6The Electric Golem. http://levelgreen.com/electricgolem/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. 6Annie Lewandowski (Powerdove). http://www.annielewandowski.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Intermodulation: Improvisation and Collaborative Art Practice for HCI

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2018
          8489 pages
          ISBN:9781450356206
          DOI:10.1145/3173574

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 April 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader