skip to main content
10.1145/3174910.3174926acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

AVATAREX: Telexistence System based on Virtual Avatars

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The telexistence technology can provide many kinds of benefits for the society. These include new ways of remote work, empowerment of handicapped and elderly people, and creation of new immersive and environmentally-friendly forms of tourism, travel, shopping, sports and leisure time activities. In this paper, we introduce AVATAREX, a telexistence system based on virtual avatars. AVATAREX provides means for connecting users that are simultaneously occupying the same space in the real world and its virtual replica. Using an indoor prototype implementation of AVATAREX and a simple collaborative game, we investigated how users experience co-presence in a telexistence system based on virtual avatars and measured the performance of AVATAREX on high-end smart glasses. Based on our findings, users wearing virtual reality gear reported a stronger sense of co-presence compared to users wearing augmented reality gear. Unexpectedly, users wearing smart glasses reported a lower sense of co-presence than users using a tablet for augmented reality experience.

References

  1. Alatalo, T., Koskela, T., Pouke, M., Alavesa, P. and Ojala, T. 2016. VirtualOulu: collaborative, immersive and extensible 3D city model on the web. 21st International Conference on Web3D Technology (Web3D '16) (2016), 95--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beck, S., Kunert, A., Kulik, A. and Froehlich, B. 2013. Immersive group-to-group telepresence. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 19, 4 (Apr. 2013), 616--625. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Casanueva, J. and Blake, E.H. 2001. The Effects of Avatars on Co-presence in a Collaborative Virtual Environment. Proc Ann Conf SA Inst of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists. (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cummings, J.J. and Bailenson, J.N. 2016. How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence. Media Psychology. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Daher, S., Kim, K., Lee, M., Bruder, G., Schubert, R., Bailenson, J.N. and Welch, G.F. 2017. Can Social Presence Be Contagious? Effects of Social Presence Priming on Interaction with Virtual Humans. IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (Los Angeles, 2017), 201--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Due, B. 2014. The future of smart glasses: An essay about challenges and possibilities with smart glasses. Working papers on interaction and communication. 1, 2 (2014), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fanello, S., Rhemann, S.O.C., Dou, M., Tankovich, V., Loop, C. and Chou, P. 2016. Holoportation: Virtual 3D Teleportation in Real-time. Chi. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Goffman, E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Harms, C. and Biocca, F. 2004. Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked Minds Measure of Social Presence. Seventh Annual International Workshop: Presence 2004. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang, J., Quian, F., Gerber, A., Mao, Z.M., Sen, S. and Spatscheck, O. 2012. A Close Examination of Performance and Power Characteristics of 4G LTE Networks. MobiSys. (2012), 225--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Huang, J., Quian, F., Guo, Y., Zhou, Y., Xu, Q., Mao, Z.M., Sen, S. and Spatscheck, O. 2013. An In-depth Study of LTE: Effect of Network Protocol and Application Behavior on Performance. SIGCOMM (2013), 363--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Häkkilä, J., Vahabpour, F., Colley, A., Väyrynen, J. and Koskela, T. 2015. Design probes study on user perceptions of a smart glasses concept. 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '15) (2015), 223--233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jo, D., Kim, K.H. and Kim, G.J. 2015. Avatar motion adaptation for AR based 3D tele-conference. 2014 International Workshop on Collaborative Virtual Environments, 3DCVE 2014 (Jul. 2015), 29--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Koskela, T., Pouke, M., Alavesa, P., Kukka, H., Pakanen, M., Alatalo, T. and Ojala, T. 2016. Hybrid avatars: enabling co-presence in multiple realities. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Web3D Technology, Web3D 2016 (2016), 69--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lee, H., Ha, G., Lee, S. and Kim, S. 2017. A mixed reality tele-presence platform to exchange emotion and sensory information based on MPEG-V standard. Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, Y., Snavely, N., Huttenlocher, D. and Fua, P. 2012. Worldwide Pose Estimation Using 3D Point Clouds. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Vision - Volume Part I. (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lifton, J. and Paradiso, J.A. 2010. Dual reality: Merging the real and virtual. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering (2010), 12--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. MacDonald, J.H. 2009. Kruskal-Wallis Test. Biological Handbook of Statistics. (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mekuria, R., Frisiello, A., Pasin, M. and Cesar, P. 2015. Network support for social 3-d immersive tele-presence with highly realistic natural and synthetic avatar users. Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Workshop on Massively Multiuser Virtual Environments, MMVE 2015 (2015), 19--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Ustimi, A. and Kishino, F. 1994. Augmented Reality: A class of display on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Minsky, M. 1980. Telepresence. Omni. 2, 9 (1980), 45--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nowak, K.L. and Biocca, F. 2003. The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users' Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Oh, S., Park, K., Kwon, S. and So, H.-J. 2016. Designing a Multi-user Interactive Simulation Using AR Glasses. 10th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16) (2016), 539--544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Oyekoya, O., Stone, R., Steptoe, W., Alkurdi, L., Klare, S., Peer, A.., Weyrich, T., Cohen, B., Tecchia, F. and Steed, A. 2013. Supporting interoperability and presence awareness in collaborative mixed reality environments. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST (2013), 165--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Poussard, B., Richir, S., Vatjus-Anttila, J., Asteriadis, S., Zarpalas, D. and Daras, P. 2014. 3DLive: A multi-modal sensing platform allowing teleimmersive sports applications. European Signal Processing Conference (Nov. 2014), 356--360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Slater, M. and Steed, A. 2000. A Virtual Presence Counter. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Slater, M. and Wilbur, S. 1997. A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. de Souza e Silva, A. 2006. Hybrid Reality Games Reframed: Potential Uses in Educational Contexts. Games and Culture. 1, 3 (2006), 231--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Steed, A., Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Bullock, A. and Tromp, J. 1999. Leadership and collaboration in shared virtual environments. Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316). (1999). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. SuperData Research 2016. Virtual Reality Industry Report 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tachi, S. 2013. From 3D to VR and further to telexistence. 23rd International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence, ICAT 2013 (2013), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Tachi, S. 2016. Telexistence: Enabling Humans to Be Virtually Ubiquitous. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 36, 1 (Jan. 2016), 8--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tachi, S., Tanie, K. and Komoriya, K. 1980. Evaluation Apparatus of Mobility Aids for the Blind. 1462696. 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. AVATAREX: Telexistence System based on Virtual Avatars

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            AH '18: Proceedings of the 9th Augmented Human International Conference
            February 2018
            229 pages
            ISBN:9781450354158
            DOI:10.1145/3174910

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 6 February 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate121of306submissions,40%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader