skip to main content
10.1145/3183377.3183390acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Barriers to gender diversity in software development education: actionable insights from a danish case study

Published:27 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper contributes to the growing literature on the gender gap in computer science education by focusing on an exploratory case study conducted at the IT University of Copenhagen (ITU), Denmark. The specific objective of this study was to draw on existing research in order to empirically investigate the main socio-cultural barriers to female participation in the bachelor of Software Development at ITU, and to generate insights that would inform concrete and effective interventions. This investigation takes the form of an exploratory case study, providing insights into influential factors such as students' perceptions, attitudes and behavior towards software development education and gender differences in pre-university coding skills.

Empirical evidence has been collected through semi-structured interviews with 38 students (undergraduate and high school) and surveys with 395 students (undergraduate and high school). Research findings from the study have subsequently informed the design of local interventions that have led to the recruitment of double the percentage of women in the bachelor of Software Development at ITU in one year, from 11% in 2016 to 22% 2017. The study also describes and discusses such interventions.

References

  1. Pereira Cristina et al. 2014. Informatics education in Europe: institutions, degrees, students, positions, salaries. Key Data 2009-2014, Informatics Europe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hoffmann, Eva Maria. 2010 Women in Computer Science in Afghanistan in Gender Issues in Learning and Working with Information Technology: Social constructs and cultural contexts. Booth, Shirley; Goodman, Sara and Kirkup, Gill eds. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Frieze, Carol, Jeria Quesenberry. 2015. Kicking Butt in Computer Science: Women in Computing at Carnegie Mellon University. IN: Dog Ear Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chambers, D. W. 1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67,255--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cvencek, Meltzoff and Greenwald (2011) Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development. 2011 May-Jun;82(3):766--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyer, S. 1990. Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59, 960--970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. 1999. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Correll, S.J. 2001. Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691--1730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Correll, S.J. 2004. Constraints into preferences: Gender status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69, 93--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Eccles, 2011. Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. 2014. How stereotypes impair women's careers in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(12), 4403--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. OECD, The ABC of Gender Equality in Education. 2015. OECD Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller, David, Alice Eagly, Marcia Linn. 2015. Women's Representation in Science Predicts National Gender-Science Stereotypes: Evidence From 66 Nations. Journal of Educational Psychology 2015, Vol. 107, No. 3, 631--644.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. SFI - Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Velfærd. 2006. Det kønsopdelte arbejdsmarked: En kvantitativ og kvalitativ belysning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Turkle, S. 1988. `Computational Reticence: Why Women Fear the Intimate Machine', in Kramerae, C. (Ed.) Technology and Women's Voices, Routledge, London, pp.41--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Turkle, S. 1988. `Computational Reticence: Why Women Fear the Intimate Machine', in Kramerae, C. (Ed.) Technology and Women's Voices, Routledge, London, pp.41--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Misa, Thomas J. 2010. Defining the Problem. In Gender Codes: Why Women Are Leaving Computing, edited by Thomas J. Misa. Hoboken, NJ: IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheryan, Sapna, Allison Master and Andrew Meltzoff. 2015. Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls' interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. In Frontiers in Psychology 11 February 2015 |Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. 2002. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Beyer, S. 2008. Gender Differences and Intra-Gender Differences amongst Management Information Systems Students. Journal of Information Systems Education, v19 n3 p301--310 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alvarado, C, Dodds, and R. Libeskind-Hadas. 2012. Broadening Participation in Computing at Harvey Mudd College, ACM Inroads, Volume 3 Issue 4, December 2012, pp. 55--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. 2011. Do Female and Male Role Models Who Embody STEM Stereotypes Hinder Women's Anticipated Success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 656--664.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. 2017. Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Danmarks Statistik. 2011. Kvinder & mœend2011. Danmarks Statistik.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Glaser, B. G. and A. Strauss. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategy for qualitative research. New York: Aldine. (1967)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. UNDP 2016. Gender Inequality Index (GII) http://hdr.undp.org/en/composite/GIIGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Barriers to gender diversity in software development education: actionable insights from a danish case study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICSE-SEET '18: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training
          May 2018
          187 pages
          ISBN:9781450356602
          DOI:10.1145/3183377

          Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 May 2018

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • extended-abstract

          Upcoming Conference

          ICSE 2024

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader