Zhewei Hu
ABSTRACT
Introducing Open Source Software (OSS) projects into a software-engineering course has many advantages, for instance, allowing students to learn good coding practices from real-world projects, and giving students a glimpse of a real project. However, it is not easy for instructors to induce one or more OSS core teams to lend support for course projects. The alternative is to have students work on "toy features"---features for these projects not specified by OSS core teams, but by teaching staff. However, the project may be unimportant to the OSS project or may disrupt its design, making those code contributions unlikely to be integrated into the OSS code repository. In this paper, we, as both teaching staff and the core team for one OSS project called Expertiza, discuss our experience in supporting 700 students on 313 OSS-based course projects in the past five years. We manually checked these course projects, and summarize 13 common mistakes that frequently occur in students' contributions, such as not following the existing design or messy pull requests. We propose five suggestions to help students reduce the frequency of common mistakes and improve the quality of their OSS pull requests.
- Shoaib Akbar, Edward Gehringer, and Zhewei Hu. 2018. Poster: Improving Formation of Student Teams: A Clustering Approach. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training Track. ACM, To appear.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Boris B Baltes, Marcus W Dickson, Michael P Sherman, Cara C Bauer, and Jacqueline S LaGanke. 2002. Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 87, 1 (2002), 156--179.Google Scholar
- Judith Bishop, Carlos Jensen, Walt Scacchi, and Arfon Smith. 2016. How to use open source software in education. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. ACM, 321--322. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joseph Buchta, Maksym Petrenko, Denys Poshyvanyk, and Václav Rajlich. 2006. Teaching evolution of open-source projects in software engineering courses. In Software Maintenance, 2006. ICSM'06. 22nd IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 136--144. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Carrington and S-K Kim. 2003. Teaching software design with open source software. In Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003 33rd Annual, Vol. 3. IEEE, S1C-9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- HJC Ellis, RA Morelli, and GW Hislop. 2008. WIP: Challenges to educating students within the community of open source software for humanity. In The 2008 Frontiers in Education Conference.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heidi JC Ellis, Gregory W Hislop, Josephine Sears Rodriguez, and Ralph Morelli. 2012. Student software engineering learning via participation in humanitarian FOSS projects. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
- Heidi JC Ellis, Ralph A Morelli, Trishan R De Lanerolle, Jonathan Damon, and Jonathan Raye. 2007. Can humanitarian open-source software development draw new students to CS?. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 39. ACM, 551--555. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edward Gehringer, Luke Ehresman, Susan G Conger, and Prasad Wagle. 2007. Reusable learning objects through peer review: The Expertiza approach. Innovate: Journal of Online Education 3, 5 (2007), 4.Google Scholar
- Edward F Gehringer. 2011. From the manager's perspective: Classroom contributions to open-source projects. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011. IEEE, F1E-1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Georgios Gousios, Andy Zaidman, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Arie Van Deursen. 2015. Work practices and challenges in pull-based development: the integrator's perspective. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering-Volume 1. IEEE Press, 358--368. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrew Hunt and David Thomas. 2000. The pragmatic programmer: from journeyman to master. Addison-Wesley Professional. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew M St Laurent. 2004. Understanding open source and free software licensing: guide to navigating licensing issues in existing & new software. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.". Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chang Liu. 2005. Enriching software engineering courses with service-learning projects and the open-source approach. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software engineering. ACM, 613--614. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Source Making. 2017. Switch Statements. (2017). Retrieved June 25, 2017 from https://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/smells/switch-statementsGoogle Scholar
- Robert McCartney, Swapna S Gokhale, and Thérèse M Smith. 2012. Evaluating an early software engineering course with projects and tools from open source software. In Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference on International computing education research. ACM, 5--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Debora MC Nascimento, Roberto Almeida Bittencourt, and Christina Chavez. 2015. Open source projects in software engineering education: a mapping study. Computer Science Education 25, 1 (2015), 67--114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gustavo Pinto, Fernando Figueira Filho, Igor Steinmacher, and Marco A Gerosa. 2017. Training software engineers using open-source software: the professors' perspective. In The 30th IEEE Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training. 1--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rajendra K Raj and Fereydoun Kazemian. 2006. Using open source software in computer science courses. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 36th Annual. IEEE, 21--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Therese Mary Smith, Robert McCartney, Swapna S Gokhale, and Lisa C Kaczmarczyk. 2014. Selecting open source software projects to teach software engineering. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 397--402. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yang Song, Zhewei Hu, and Edward F Gehringer. 2015. Closing the Circle: Use of Students' Responses for Peer-Assessment Rubric Improvement. In International Conference on Web-Based Learning. Springer, 27--36.Google Scholar
- Yang Song, Zhewei Hu, and Edward F Gehringer. 2015. Pluggable reputation systems for peer review: A web-service approach. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015 IEEE. IEEE, 1--5. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yang Song, Zhewei Hu, and Edward F Gehringer. 2017. Collusion in educational peer assessment: How much do we need to worry about it?. In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yang Song, Zhewei Hu, Edward F Gehringer, Julia Morris, Jennifer Kidd, and Stacie Ringleb. 2016. Toward Better Training in Peer Assessment: Does Calibration Help?. In EDM (Workshops).Google Scholar
- Kal Toth. 2006. Experiences with open source software engineering tools. IEEE software 23, 6 (2006). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jason Tsay, Laura Dabbish, and James Herbsleb. 2014. Influence of social and technical factors for evaluating contribution in GitHub. In Proceedings of the 36th international conference on Software engineering. ACM, 356--366. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wikipedia. 2017. Test-driven development. (2017). Retrieved June 25, 2017 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test-driven_developmentGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Open-source software in class: students' common mistakes
Recommendations
Open Source Drives Innovation
Engineers using free and open source software created many of today's most innovative products and solutions. FOSS also changed the way we develop software. IEEE Software's Open Source column first appeared in this magazine in July 2004. In this last ...
A Perspective on Software Engineering Education with Open Source Software
As the development and use of open source software OSS becomes prominent, the issue of its outreach in an educational context arises. The practices fundamental to software engineering, including those related to management, process, and workflow ...
Open source software licenses: Strong-copyleft, non-copyleft, or somewhere in between?
Studies on open source software (OSS) have shown that the license under which an OSS is released has an impact on the success or failure of the software. In this paper, we model the relationship between an OSS developer's utility, the effort that goes ...
Comments