skip to main content
10.1145/3196709.3196721acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Use(fulness) of Therapeutic Toys: Practice-derived Design Lenses for Toy Design

Published:08 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Early Intervention Services support children with disabilities in their development from early age on. To this end, therapeutic toys are regularly employed within training sessions. These toys often draw on interactive elements to make exercising more appealing, and hence, to motivate the children. While there is some research about interactive therapeutic toys in HCI, these works are often standalone design deployments, exploring specific health or rehabilitation applications. In contrast, this paper offers different lenses for investigating qualities of therapeutic toys to highlight the following aspects: therapeutic and playful/motivational efforts, the potential of technology in supporting suitable affordances, ease of use, flexibility and improvisation. The lenses enable guided explorations of existing toys or novel design proposals, resulting from a thematic analysis of a) in-situ observations of therapeutic exercises (n=18), b) in-depth/informal interviews with Early Intervention Specialists (combined n=16), and c) demonstrations of their favorite toys (n=21).

References

  1. Alissa N. Antle, Min Fan, and Emily S. Cramer. 2015. PhonoBlocks: A Tangible System for Supporting Dyslexic Children Learning to Read. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, ACM, 533--538. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2, 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jane Brodin. 1999. Play in Children with Severe Multiple Disabilities: Play with toys - a review. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 46, 1, 25--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Oxford Dictionary. 2017. Definition for "Toy". Retrieved September 05, 2017 from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/toyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Taciana Pontual Falcão. 2010. The role of tangible technologies for special education. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2911--2914. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Peter Fikar, Florian Güldenpfennig, and Roman Ganhör. 2018. The Cuebe: Facilitating Playful Early Intervention for the Visually Impaired. In International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interactions, 35--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Christopher Frauenberger, Julia Makhaeva, and Katharina Spiel. 2016. Designing Smart Objects with Autistic Children: Four Design Exposés. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 130--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Florian Güldenpfennig, Peter Fikar, and Roman Ganhör. 2018. Interactive and Open-Ended Sensory Toys: Designing with Therapists and Children for Tangible and Visual Interaction. In International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interactions, Stockholm, 451--459. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Johan Huizinga. 1971. Homo Ludens. A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Paladin, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Richard Huo, Susan K Burden, Creig S Hoyt, and William V Good. 1999. Chronic cortical visual impairment in children: aetiology, prognosis, and associated neurological deficits. British Journal of Ophthalmology 83, 6, 670--675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lea Hyvärinen. 1995. Considerations in Evaluation and Treatment of the Child With Low Vision. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 49, 9, 891--897.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Barry M. Kudrowitz and David R. Wallace. 2009. The play pyramid: a play classification and ideation tool for toy design. International Journal of Arts and Technology 3, 1, 36--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Karin Lifter, Suzanne Foster-Sanda, Caley Arzamarski, Jacquelyn Briesch, and Ellen Mcclure. 2011. Overview of Play: Its Uses and Importance in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education. Infants & Young Children 24, 3, 225--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Conor Linehan, Jonathan Waddington, Timothy L. Hodgson, Kieran Hicks, and Robert Banks. 2014. Designing games for the rehabilitation of functional vision for children with cerebral visual impairment. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1207--1212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Annette Majnemer. 1998. Benefits of early intervention for children with developmental disabilities. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology 5, 1, 62--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kevin Marshall, Gavin Wood, Janet C. Read, Svetlana Yarosh, Madeline Balaam, and Jung-Joo Lee. 2015. Supporting Children to Engage in Play for Wellbeing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2445--2448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Paul Marshall. 2007. Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, ACM, 163--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Maria B. C. Martín, Alejandro Santos-Lozano, Juan Martín-Hernández, Alberto López-Miguel, Miguel Maldonado, Carlos Baladrón, Corinna M. Bauer, and Lotfi B. Merabet. 2016. Cerebral versus Ocular Visual Impairment: The Impact on Developmental Neuroplasticity. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Aleksandar Matic, Gillian R. Hayes, Monica Tentori, Maryam Abdullah, and Sabrina Schuck. 2014. Collective use of a situated display to encourage positive behaviors in children with behavioral challenges. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACM, 885--895. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pekka Mertala, Hannele Karikoski, Liisa Tähtinen, and Vesa-Matti Sarenius. 2016. The value of toys: 6--8-year-old children's toy preferences and the functional analysis of popular toys. International Journal of Play 5, 1, 11--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Donald A. Norman. 2008. THE WAY I SEE IT: Signifiers, not affordances. interactions 15, 6, 1819. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sara Price. 2008. A representation approach to conceptualizing tangible learning environments. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, ACM, 151--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sara Price, Jennifer G. Sheridan, Taciana Pontual Falcão. 2010. Action and representation in tangible systems: implications for design of learning interactions. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, ACM, 145--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Olga Pykhtina, Madeline Balaam, Gavin Wood, Sue Pattison, Ahmed Kharrufa, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Magic land: the design and evaluation of an interactive tabletop supporting therapeutic play with children. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ACM, 136--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Craig T. Ramey and Sharon Landesman Ramey. 1998. Early intervention and early experience. American Psychologist 53, 2, 109--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Yvonne Rogers. 2012. HCI Theory: Classical, Modern and Contemporary. Morgan and Claypool. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Steven A. Rosenberg, Duan Zhang, and Cordelia C. Robinson. 2008. Prevalence of Developmental Delays and Participation in Early Intervention Services for Young Children. Pediatrics 121, 6, e1503.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Mit University Press Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Florian Scharf, Thomas Winkler, and Michael Herczeg. 2008. Tangicons: algorithmic reasoning in a collaborative game for children in kindergarten and first class. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children, ACM, 242--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tobias Sonne and Mads Møller Jensen. 2016. ChillFish: A Respiration Game for Children with ADHD. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, ACM, 271--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Victoria Tam, Mirko Gelsomini, and Franca Garzotto. 2017. Polipo: a Tangible Toy for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, ACM, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jonathan Waddington, Conor Linehan, Kathrin Gerling, Kieran Hicks, and Timothy L. Hodgson. 2015. Participatory Design of Therapeutic Video Games for Young People with Neurological Vision Impairment. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3533--3542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Donna R. Weston, Barbara Ivins, Maty Claire Heffron, and Nancy Sweet. 1997. Formulating the Centrality of Relationships in Early Intervention: An Organizational Perspective. Infants & Young Children 9, 3, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Oren Zuckerman, Saeed Arida, and Mitchel Resnick. 2005. Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 859--868. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Use(fulness) of Therapeutic Toys: Practice-derived Design Lenses for Toy Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2018
      1418 pages
      ISBN:9781450351980
      DOI:10.1145/3196709

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader