skip to main content
10.1145/3204493.3204558acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

BORE: boosted-oriented edge optimization for robust, real time remote pupil center detection

Published:14 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Undoubtedly, eye movements contain an immense amount of information, especially when looking to fast eye movements, namely time to the fixation, saccade, and micro-saccade events. While, modern cameras support recording of few thousand frames per second, to date, the majority of studies use eye trackers with the frame rates of about 120 Hz for head-mounted and 250 Hz for remote-based trackers. In this study, we aim to overcome the challenge of the pupil tracking algorithms to perform real time with high speed cameras for remote eye tracking applications. We propose an iterative pupil center detection algorithm formulated as an optimization problem. We evaluated our algorithm on more than 13,000 eye images, in which it outperforms earlier solutions both with regard to runtime and detection accuracy. Moreover, our system is capable of boosting its runtime in an unsupervised manner, thus we remove the need for manual annotation of pupil images.

References

  1. Mansour Asadifard and Jamshid Shanbezadeh. 2010. Automatic adaptive center of pupil detection using face detection and cdf analysis. In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Vol. 1. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. J. Atherton and D. J. Kerbyson. 1999. Size invariant circle detection. Image and Vision computing 17, 11 (1999), 795--803.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Braunagel, E. Kasneci, W. Stolzmann, and W. Rosenstiel. 2015. Driver-Activity Recognition in the Context of Conditionally Autonomous Driving. In 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 1652--1657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Droege and D. Paulus. 2010. Pupil center detection in low resolution images. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications. ACM, 169--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Wolfgang Fuhl, David Geisler, Thiago Santini, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, and Enkelejda Kasneci. 2016a. Evaluation of State-of-the-art Pupil Detection Algorithms on Remote Eye Images. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1716--1725. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. W. Fuhl, T. Santini, and E. Kasneci. 2017. Fast and Robust Eyelid Outline and Aperture Detection in Real-World Scenarios. In 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). 1089--1097.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. Fuhl, T. C. Santini, T. Kübler, and E. Kasneci. 2016b. ElSe: Ellipse Selection for Robust Pupil Detection in Real-world Environments. In Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 123--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Wolfgang Fuhl, Marc Tonsen, Andreas Bulling, and Enkelejda Kasneci. 2016c. Pupil detection for head-mounted eye tracking in the wild: an evaluation of the state of the art. Machine Vision and Applications 27, 8 (2016), 1275--1288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. George and A. Routray. 2016. Fast and Accurate Algorithm for Eye Localization for Gaze Tracking in Low Resolution Images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.05272 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kenneth Holmqvist, Marcus Nyström, Richard Andersson, Richard Dewhurst, Halszka Jarodzka, and Joost Van de Weijer. 2011. Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. OUP Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. O. Jesorsky, K.J Kirchberg, and Robert W. F. 2001. Robust face detection using the hausdorff distance. In Audio-and video-based biometric person authentication. Springer, 90--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E. Kasneci. 2013. Towards the Automated Recognition of Assistance Need for Drivers with Impaired Visual Field. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstr. 32, 72074 Tübingen. http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/volltexte/2013/7033Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Moritz Kassner, William Patera, and Andreas Bulling. 2014. Pupil: An Open Source Platform for Pervasive Eye Tracking and Mobile Gaze-based Interaction. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1151--1160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. X. Liu, F. Xu, and K. Fujimura. 2002. Real-time eye detection and tracking for driver observation under various light conditions. In Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, 2002. IEEE, Vol. 2. IEEE, 344--351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gareth Loy and Alexander Zelinsky. 2003. Fast Radial Symmetry for Detecting Points of Interest. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 25, 8 (Aug. 2003), 959--973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Milborrow, J. Morkel, and F. Nicolls. 2010. The MUCT Landmarked Face Database. Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (2010). http://www.milbo.org/muct.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. David A Robinson. 1963. A method of measuring eye movemnent using a scieral search coil in a magnetic field. Bio-medical Electronics, IEEE Transactions on 10, 4 (1963), 137--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Thiago Santini, Wolfgang Fuhl, and Enkelejda Kasneci. 2018. PuRe: Robust pupil detection for real-time pervasive eye tracking. Computer Vision and Image Understanding (Feb 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Evangelos Skodras and Nikos Fakotakis. 2015. Precise Localization of Eye Centers in Low Resolution Color Images. Image Vision Comput. 36, C (April 2015), 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. L. Świrski, A. Bulling, and N. Dodgson. 2012. Robust real-time pupil tracking in highly off-axis images. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA). ACM, 173--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Te Tan, Jan Philipp Hakenberg, and Cuntai Guan. 2013. Estimation of glance from EEG for cursor control. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. IEEE, 2919--2923.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. F. Timm and E. Barth. 2011. Accurate Eye Centre Localisation by Means of Gradients. VISAPP 11 (2011), 125--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A. Villanueva, V. Ponz, L. Sesma-Sanchez, M. Ariz, S. Porta, and R. Cabeza. 2013. Hybrid method based on topography for robust detection of iris center and eye corners. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM) 9, 4 (2013), 25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. BORE: boosted-oriented edge optimization for robust, real time remote pupil center detection

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ETRA '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications
          June 2018
          595 pages
          ISBN:9781450357067
          DOI:10.1145/3204493

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 June 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate69of137submissions,50%

          Upcoming Conference

          ETRA '24
          The 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
          June 4 - 7, 2024
          Glasgow , United Kingdom

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader