skip to main content
10.1145/3209281.3209317acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Challenges of blockchain technology adoption for e-government: a systematic literature review

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The ability of blockchain technology to record transactions on distributed ledgers offers new opportunities for governments to improve transparency, prevent fraud, and establish trust in the public sector. However, blockchain adoption and use in the context of e-Government is rather unexplored in academic literature. In this paper, we systematically review relevant research to understand the current research topics, challenges and future directions regarding blockchain adoption for e-Government. The results show that the adoption of blockchain-based applications in e-Government is still very limited and there is a lack of empirical evidence. The main challenges faced in blockchain adoption are predominantly presented as technological aspects such as security, scalability and flexibility. From an organizational point of view, the issues of acceptability and the need of new governance models are presented as the main barriers to adoption. Moreover, the lack of legal and regulatory support is identified as the main environmental barrier of adoption. Based on the challenges presented in the literature, we propose future research questions that need to be addressed to inform how the public sector should approach the blockchain technology adoption.

References

  1. Ahrain, T. et al. 2017. Blockchain technology innovations. 2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON) (Jun. 2017), 137--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Angraal, S. et al. 2017. Blockchain Technology: Applications in Health Care. Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 10, 9 (Sep. 2017), e003800.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Back, A. et al. 2014. Enabling blockchain innovations with pegged sidechains. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas, K. and Muthukkumarasamy, V. 2017. Securing smart cities using blockchain technology. Proceedings - 18th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, 14th IEEE International Conference on Smart City and 2nd IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Systems, HPCC/SmartCity/DSS 2016 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Biswas, K. and Muthukkumarasamy, V. 2016. Securing Smart Cities Using Blockchain Technology. 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) (Dec. 2016), 1392--1393.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Blockchain technology: Redefining trust for a global, digital economy: 2016. https://medium.com/mit-media-lab-digital-currency-initiative/blockchain-technology-redefining-trust-for-a-global-digital-economy-1dc869593308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bore, N. et al. 2017. Towards Blockchain-enabled School Information Hub. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development - ICTD '17 (New York, New York, USA, 2017), 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Buterin, V. 2014. Ethereum White Paper: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cai, Y. and Zhu, D. 2016. Fraud detections for online businesses: a perspective from blockchain technology. Financial Innovation. 2, 1 (Dec. 2016), 20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Charters, S. et al. 2009. Objectivity in Research: Challenges from the Evidence-Based Paradigm. 2009 Australian Software Engineering Conference (2009), 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Crosby, M. 2016. BlockChain Technology: Beyond Bitcoin. Applied Innovation Review Issue. 2 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Digital transformation in government and blockchain technology - GOV.UK: 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/digital-transformation-in-government-and-blockchain-technology. Accessed: 2017-09-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Düdder, B. and Ross, O. 2017. Timber tracking: Reducing complexity of due diligence by using blockchain technology (position paper). CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. e-Government: 2015. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/ict/brief/e-government. Accessed: 2017-04-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelenburg, S.V.S. van et al. 2017. Design of a software architecture supporting business-to-government information sharing to improve public safety and security. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. (Jul. 2017), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. EY 2016.14th Global Fraud Survey: Corporate misconduct - individual consequences Global enforcement focuses the spotlight on executive integrity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaetani, E. et al. 2017. Blockchain-based database to ensure data integrity in cloud computing environments. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilad, Y. et al. 2017. Algorand: Scaling Byzantine Agreements for Cryptocurrencies. In Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Heintze, T. and Bretschneider, S. 2000. Information Technology and Restructuring in Public Organizations: Does Adoption of Information Technology Affect Organizational Structures, Communications, and Decision Making? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 10, 4 (Oct. 2000), 801--830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Hou, H. 2017. The application of blockchain technology in E-government in China. 2017 26th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, ICCCN 2017 (Jul. 2017), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Hyvärinen, H. et al. 2017. A Blockchain-Based Approach Towards Overcoming Financial Fraud in Public Sector Services. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 59, 6 (Dec. 2017), 441--456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Janowski, T. 2015. Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly. 32, 3 (Jul. 2015), 221--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Kewell, B. et al. 2017. Blockchain for good? Strategic Change. 26, 5 (Sep. 2017), 429--437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Kitchenham, B. and Charters, S. 2007. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature reviews in Software Engineering Version 2.3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Konashevych, O. 2017. The concept of the blockchain-based governing: Current issues and general vision. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG (2017), 79--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kshetri, N. 2017. Blockchain's roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy. Telecommunications Policy. (Sep. 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lander, L. and Cooper, N. 2017. Promoting public deliberation in low trust environments: Australian use cases. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2017), 74--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu, P.T.S. 2016. Medical Record System Using Blockchain, Big Data and Tokenization. Springer, Cham. 254--261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Margheri, A. et al. 2017. A Distributed Infrastructure for Democratic Cloud Federations. IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, CLOUD (Jun. 2017), 688--691.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Marsal-Llacuna and Maria-Lluïsa 2017. Future living framework: Is blockchain the next enabling network? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. December (Dec. 2017), 0--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. McConaghy, Trent, et al. 2016. BigchainDB: a scalable blockchain database. BigChainDB.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Moura, T. and Gomes, A. 2017. Blockchain Voting and its effects on Election Transparency and Voter Confidence. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research - dg.o '17 (New York, New York, USA, 2017), 574--575. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Nakamoto, S. 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. www.bitcoin.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Nunamaker, J.F. et al. 1990. Systems Development in Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems. 7, 3 (Dec. 1990), 89--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ølnes, S. 2016. Beyond Bitcoin enabling smart government using blockchain technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, Cham. 253--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ølnes, S. et al. 2017. Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly. 34, 3 (Oct. 2017), 355--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Ølnes, S. and Jansen, A. 2017. Blockchain Technology as s Support Infrastructure in e-Government. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Peck, M.E. 2017. Blockchains: How They Work and Why They'll Change the World - IEEE Spectrum. IEEE Spectrum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Pilkington, M. 2015. Blockchain Technology: Principles and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Raju, S. et al. 2017. The Case for a Data Bank:: an Institution to Govern Healthcare and Education. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV '17 (New York, New York, USA, 2017), 538--539. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sharples, M. and Domingue, J. 2016. The Blockchain and Kudos: A Distributed System for Educational Record, Reputation and Reward. Springer, Cham. 490--496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Sullivan, C. and Burger, E. 2017. E-residency and blockchain. Computer Law and Security Review. 33, 4 (Aug. 2017), 470--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Sun, J. et al. 2016. Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities. Financial Innovation. 2, 1 (Dec. 2016), 26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Tasca, P. et al. 2017. Ontology of Blockchain Technologies. Principles of Identification and Classification. SRN Electronic Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Tornatzky, L.G. et al. 1990. The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Understanding the basics of blockchain in government | Deloitte Insights: 2017. https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/industry/public-sector/understanding-basics-of-blockchain-in-government.html. Accessed: 2018-01-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. United Nations 2014. UN E-Government Survey 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. United Nations 2016. UN E-Government Survey 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Vukolić M. 2016. The Quest for Scalable Blockchain Fabric: Proof-of-Work vs. BFT Replication. In: Camenisch J., Kesdoğan D. (eds) Open Problems in Network Security. iNetSec 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9591. Springer, ChamGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Wijaya, D.A. et al. 2017. A New Blockchain-Based Value-Added Tax System. Springer, Cham. 471 --486.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Yeoh, P. 2017. Regulatory issues in blockchain technology. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. 25, 2 (May 2017), 196--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Yli-Huumo, J. et al. 2016. Where is current research on Blockchain technology? - A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 11, 10 (Oct. 2016), e0163477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Zheng, Z. et al. 2017. An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends. 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress) (Jun. 2017), 557--564.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Challenges of blockchain technology adoption for e-government: a systematic literature review

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age
          May 2018
          889 pages
          ISBN:9781450365260
          DOI:10.1145/3209281

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 May 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader