Natalie Hube
ABSTRACT
Augmented reality (AR) has gained exceptional importance in supporting task performance. Particularly, in quality assurance (QA) processes in the automotive sector AR offers a diversity of use cases. In this paper we propose an interface design which projects information as a digital canvas on the surface of vehicle components. Based on a requirement analysis, we discuss design aspects and describe our application in applying the quality assurance process of a luxury automaker. The application includes a personal view on spatial information embedded in a guided interaction process as a design solution that can be applied to enhance QA processes.
- Haslina Arshad, Shahan Ahmad Chowdhury, Lam Meng Chun, Behrang Parhizkar, and Waqas Khalid Obeidy. 2016. A Freeze-object Interaction Technique for Handheld Augmented Reality Systems. Multimedia Tools Appl. 75, 10 (May 2016), 5819--5839. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ronald Azuma, Yohan Baillot, Reinhold Behringer, Steven Feiner, Simon Julier, and Blair MacIntyre. 2001. Recent Advances in Augmented Reality. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 21, 6 (Nov. 2001), 34--47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ronald Azuma and Chris Furmanski. 2003. Evaluating Label Placement for Augmented Reality View Management. In Proceedings of the 2Nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR '03). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 66--. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huidong Bai, Gun A. Lee, and Mark Billinghurst. 2012. Freeze View Touch and Finger Gesture Based Interaction Methods for Handheld Augmented Reality Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 126--131. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sebastian Boring, Dominikus Baur, Andreas Butz, Sean Gustafson, and Patrick Baudisch. 2010. Touch Projector: Mobile Interaction Through Video. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2287--2296. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juanita Brown. 2006. The World Café - Shaping Our Futures through Conversations that Matter. Journal of OrgChange Mgmt 19, 2 (March 2006), 266--268.Google Scholar
- Alan B. Craig. 2013. Understanding Augmented Reality: Concepts and Applications. Newnes. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arindam Dey and Christian Sandor. 2014. Lessons learned: Evaluating visualizations for occluded objects in handheld augmented reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 10 (Oct. 2014), 704--716. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Drascic and Paul Milgram. 1996. Perceptual issues in augmented reality, Vol. 2653. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 123--135.Google Scholar
- Inc FARO Technologies. 2017. Augmented Reality for Quality Assurance. https://www.faro.com/en-gb/news/augmented-reality-for-quality-assurance/. (2017). Accessed: 2017-03-15.Google Scholar
- C. Furmanski, R. Azuma, and M. Daily. 2002. Augmented-reality visualizations guided by cognition: perceptual heuristics for combining visible and obscured information. In Proceedings. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 215--320. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steffen Gauglitz, Benjamin Nuernberger, Matthew Turk, and Tobias Höllerer. 2014. In Touch with the Remote World: Remote Collaboration with Augmented Reality Drawings and Virtual Navigation. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 197--205. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Geymayer, Markus Steinberger, Alexander Lex, Marc Streit, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2014. Show Me the Invisible: Visualizing Hidden Content. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst CHI -apos14 (2014), 3705--3714. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Georg Glaeser. 2018. Extreme and Subjective Perspectives. In Topics in Algebra, Analysis and Geometry.Google Scholar
- J. Grubert, H. Seichter, and D. Schmalstieg. 2014. {DEMO} Towards user perspective augmented reality for public displays. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 339--340.Google Scholar
- Sean G. Gustafson and Pourang P. Irani. 2007. Comparing Visualizations for Tracking Off-screen Moving Targets. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2399--2404. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. E. Hove and B. Anda. 2005. Experiences from conducting semi-structured interviews in empirical software engineering research. In 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'05). 10 pp.--23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Kruijff, J. E. Swan, and S. Feiner. 2010. Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 3--12.Google Scholar
- Gun A. Lee, Ungyeon Yang, Yongwan Kim, Dongsik Jo, Ki-Hong Kim, Jae Ha Kim, and Jin Sung Choi. 2009. Freeze-Set-Go Interaction Method for Handheld Mobile Augmented Reality Environments. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rui Li and Jiayan Zhao. 2017. Off-Screen Landmarks on Mobile Devices: Levels of Measurement and the Perception of Distance on Resized Icons. Künstliche Intelligenz 31, 2 (May 2017), 141--149.Google Scholar
- Peter Mohr, Bernhard Kerbl, Michael Donoser, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Denis Kalkofen. 2015. Retargeting Technical Documentation to Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3337--3346. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Nagyová and H. Paciova. 2010. Quality Evaluation Methodology for Research Projects. DAAAM International Scientific Book.Google Scholar
- Andrew YC Nee and Soh-Khim Ong. 2013. Virtual and augmented reality applications in manufacturing. IFAC proceedings volumes 46, 9 (2013), 15--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gerhard Reitmayr and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2004. Collaborative augmented reality for outdoor navigation and information browsing. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Location Based Services and TeleCartography.Google Scholar
- Ruth Rosenholtz, Yuanzhen Li, Jonathan Mansfield, and Zhenlan Jin. 2005. Feature Congestion: A Measure of Display Clutter. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 761--770. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Torben Schinke, Niels Henze, and Susanne Boll. 2010. Visualization of Off-screen Objects in Mobile Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 313--316. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. H. Sung, Y. Choi, H. Ko, and J. I. Hwang. 2014. Level-of-detail AR: Managing points of interest for attentive augmented reality. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE). 351--352.Google Scholar
- Yao-Ting Sung, Kuo-En Chang, Huei-Tse Hou, and Pin-Fu Chen. 2010. Designing an Electronic Guidebook for Learning Engagement in a Museum of History. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 1 (Jan. 2010), 74--83. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew Tait and Mark Billinghurst. 2015. The Effect of View Independence in a Collaborative AR System. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 24, 6 (Dec. 2015), 563--589. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Tatzgern, V. Orso, D. Kalkofen, G. Jacucci, L. Gamberini, and D. Schmalstieg. 2016. Adaptive information density for augmented reality displays. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 83--92.Google Scholar
- Giles Westerfield, Antonija Mitrovic, and Mark Billinghurst. 2015. Intelligent Augmented Reality Training for Motherboard Assembly. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25, 1 (March 2015), 157--172.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jan Wojdziak, Bastian Bansemir, Bettina Kirchner, Berit Lochner, and Rainer Groh. 2016. Low-Fidelity Prototyping for Collaborative User Interface Specifications. In HCI International 2016 - Posters' Extended Abstracts (Communications in Computer and Information Science). Springer, Cham, 167--172.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Towards Augmented Reality in Quality Assurance Processes
Recommendations
Haptics in Augmented Reality
ICMCS '99: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems - Volume 2An augmented reality system merges synthetic sensory information into a user's perception of a three-dimensional environment. An important performance goal for an augmented reality system is that the user perceives a single seamless environment. In most ...
Augmented reality as perceptual reality
VSMM'06: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Interactive Technologies and Sociotechnical SystemsAs shown in Paul Milgram et al’s Reality-Virtuality Continuum (1994), Augmented Reality occupies a very unique status in the spectrum of Mixed Reality. Unlike Virtual Reality, which is completely made up of the virtual and has been the most important ...
Multimodal augmented reality: the norm rather than the exception
MVAR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 workshop on Multimodal Virtual and Augmented RealityAugmented reality (AR) is commonly seen as a technology that overlays virtual imagery onto a participant's view of the world. In line with this, most AR research is focused on what we see. In this paper, we challenge this focus on vision and make a case ...
Comments