ABSTRACT
Multi-Objective Recommender Systems (MO-RS) consider several objectives to produce useful recommendations. Besides accuracy, other important quality metrics include novelty and diversity of recommended lists of items. Previous research up to this point focused on naive combinations of objectives. In this paper, we present a new and adaptable strategy for prioritizing objectives focused on users' preferences. Our proposed strategy is based on meta-features, i.e., characteristics of the input data that are influential in the final recommendation. We conducted a series of experiments on three real-world datasets, from which we show that: (i) the use of meta-features leads to the improvement of the Pareto solution set in the search process; (ii) the strategy is effective at making choices according to the specificities of the users' preferences; and (iii) our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods in MO-RS.
- Gediminas Adomavicius and Alexander Tuzhilin . 2005. Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions IEEE TKDE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gediminas Adomavicius and Jingjing Zhang . 2012. Impact of Data Characteristics on Recommender Systems Performance ACM TMIS. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates and Berthier Ribeiro-Neto . 1999. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xinlong Bao, Lawrence Bergman, and Rich Thompson . 2009. Stacking Recommendation Engines with Additional Meta-features ACM RecSys. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John S. Breese, David Heckerman, and Carl Kadie . 1998. Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering UAI. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robin Burke . 2002. Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments UMUAI. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juan J. Durillo and Antonio J. Nebro . 2011. jMetal: A Java framework for multi-objective optimization Advances in Engineering Software. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reinaldo Silva Fortes, Alan R. R. de Freitas, and Marcos André Gonçalves . 2017. A Multicriteria Evaluation of Hybrid Recommender Systems: On the Usefulness of Input Data Characteristics. In ICEIS.Google Scholar
- Zeno Gantner, Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme . 2011. MyMediaLite: A Free Recommender System Library ACM RecSys. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bingrui Geng, Lingling Li, Licheng Jiao, Maoguo Gong, Qing Cai, and Yue Wu . 2015. NNIA-RS: A multi-objective optimization based recommender system Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.Google Scholar
- Ken Goldberg, Theresa Roeder, Dhruv Gupta, and Chris Perkins . 2001. Eigentaste: A Constant Time Collaborative Filtering Algorithm Inf. Retr. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adolfo Guimarães, Thales F. Costa, Anisio Lacerda, Gisele L. Pappa, and Nivio Ziviani . 2013. GUARD: A Genetic Unified Approach for Recommendation JIDM.Google Scholar
- Asela Gunawardana and Guy Shani . 2009. A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks JMLR. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, Al Borchers, and John Riedl . 1999. An Algorithmic Framework for Performing Collaborative Filtering ACM SIGIR. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, Loren G. Terveen, and John T. Riedl . 2004. Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems ACM TOIS. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dietmar Jannach, Lukas Lerche, Iman Kamehkhosh, and Michael Jugovac . 2015. What recommenders recommend: an analysis of recommendation biases and possible countermeasures. In UMUAI. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Komal Kapoor, Vikas Kumar, Loren Terveen, Joseph A. Konstan, and Paul Schrater . 2015. "I Like to Explore Sometimes": Adapting to Dynamic User Novelty Preferences. In ACM RecSys. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sean M. McNee, John Riedl, and Joseph A. Konstan . 2006. Being Accurate is Not Enough: How Accuracy Metrics Have Hurt Recommender Systems. In CHI EA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Nivio Ziviani, Edleno Silva De Moura, Itamar Hata, Anisio Lacerda, and Adriano Veloso . 2014. Multiobjective Pareto-Efficient Approaches for Recommender Systems ACM TIST.Google Scholar
- Joseph Sill, Gabor Takacs, Lester Mackey, and David Lin . 2009. Feature-Weighted Linear Stacking. arXiv:0911.0460 {cs} (2009).Google Scholar
- Saúl Vargas and Pablo Castells . 2011. Rank and Relevance in Novelty and Diversity Metrics for Recommender Systems ACM RecSys. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shanfeng Wang, Maoguo Gong, Haoliang Li, and Junwei Yang . 2016. Multi-objective optimization for long tail recommendation KBS. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mi Zhang and Neil Hurley . 2008. Avoiding Monotony: Improving the Diversity of Recommendation Lists ACM RecSys. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cai-Nicolas Ziegler, Sean M. McNee, Joseph A. Konstan, and Georg Lausen . 2005. Improving Recommendation Lists Through Topic Diversification ACM WWW. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- User-Oriented Objective Prioritization for Meta-Featured Multi-Objective Recommender Systems
Recommendations
Multi-Objective Recommendations
KDD '21: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data MiningThe development of recommender systems usually deal with single-objective optimizations, such as minimizing prediction errors or maximizing the ranking quality. There is an emerging demand in multi-objective recommendations in which the recommendation ...
A survey of recommender systems with multi-objective optimization
AbstractRecommender systems have been widely applied to several domains and applications to assist decision making by recommending items tailored to user preferences. One of the popular recommendation algorithms is the model-based approach ...
Incorporating user rating credibility in recommender systems
AbstractThere have been many research efforts aimed at improving recommendation accuracy with Collaborative Filtering (CF). Yet there is still a lack of investigation into the integration of CF algorithms with the analysis of users’ rating behaviors. In ...
Comments