S. Kumar
- 1 BERGE, C. The Theory of Graphs and Its Applications. Wiley, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
- 2 BIRKtIOFF, G. Lattice Theory (rev. ed.). Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publications, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R. I., 1948.Google Scholar
- 3 BONNER, R.E. On some clustering techniques. IBM J. Res. Devel. 8, 1 (Jan. 1964), 22-32.Google Scholar
- 4 CLEVERDON, C.W. Report on the testing and analysis of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems. ASLIB-Cranfield Research Rep., Oct. 1962. Cranfield, Bedford, England.Google Scholar
- 5 ENGINEERS JOINT COUNCIL. Thesaurus of Engineering Terms (lst ed.). New York, May 1964.Google Scholar
- 6 GIULIANO, V. E., AND JONES, P.E. Linear associative information retrieval. In Howerton, P. W., and Weeks, D. C. (Eds.), Vistas in Information Handling, Vol. I, Spartan Books, Washington, D. C., 1963, Ch. 2, pp. 30-46.Google Scholar
- 7 LEWIS, P.A. W., BAXENDALE, P. B., AND BENNETT, J.L. Statistical discrimination of the synonymy/antonymy relationship between words. J. ACM i$, 1 (Jan. 1967), 20-44. Google Scholar
- 8 LInRAaY OF CONGRESS. Subject Headings (6th ed.). Washington, D. C., 1957.Google Scholar
- 9 MARON, M. E., AND KUHNS, J.L. On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval. J. ACM 7, 3 (July 1960), 216-244. Google Scholar
- 10 MEETHAM, A.R. Graph separability and word grouping. Proe. 21st National Conference ACM, July 1966 (ACM Pub. P-66). Thompson Book Co., Washington, D. C., pp. 513-514. Google Scholar
- 11 NEEDHAM, R.M. Applications of the theory of clumps. Mech. Transl. Comput. Linguist. 8 (June and Oct. 1965), 113-127.Google Scholar
- 12 RIAL, J. F. A pseudo-metric for document retrieval systems. Rep. W4595, The Mitre Corp., Bedford, Mass.Google Scholar
- 13 RoccHio, J .J . Document retrieval systems--optimization and evaluation. Harvard U. doctoral th., Rep. No. ISR-10 to the National Science Foundation, Harvard Computation Lab., March 1966.Google Scholar
- 14 SALTON, G. Associative document retrieval techniques using bibliographic information. J. ACM 10, 4 (Oct. 1963), 440-457. Google Scholar
- 15 SPXRCK-JONES, K. Experiments in semantic classification. Mech. Transl. Comput. Linquist. 8 (June and Oct. 1965), 92-112.Google Scholar
- 16 STEVENS, M. E. (Ed.). Proc. Symposium in St.~tistical 'Assocb~tion Methods for Mechanized Documentation. US Government Printing Office, NBS Misc. Pub. 269, Dec. 1965.Google Scholar
- 17 STILES, H .E . The association factor in information retrieval. J. ACM 8, 2 (April 1961), 271-279. Google Scholar
- 18 US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE. MEDLARS Medical Subject Headings (3rd ed.). Washington, D. C., Jan. 1964.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Semantic Clustering of Index Terms
Recommendations
Self-Organizing-Map Based Clustering Using a Local Clustering Validity Index
Classical clustering methods, such as partitioning and hierarchical clustering algorithms, often fail to deliver satisfactory results, given clusters of arbitrary shapes. Motivated by a clustering validity index based on inter-cluster and intra-cluster ...
A clustering validity assessment index
PAKDD '03: Proceedings of the 7th Pacific-Asia conference on Advances in knowledge discovery and data miningClustering is a method for grouping objects with similar patterns and finding meaningful clusters in a data set. There exist a large number of clustering algorithms in the literature, and the results of clustering even in a particular algorithm vary ...
A new validity index for evaluating the clustering results by partitional clustering algorithms
Partitional clustering algorithms are the most widely used approach in clustering problems. However, how to evaluate the clustering performance of these algorithms remains unanswered due to the lack of an efficient measure for accurately representing ...
Comments