skip to main content
10.1145/3218603.3218648acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesislpedConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EcoMicro: A Miniature Self-Powered Inertial Sensor Node Based on Bluetooth Low Energy

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes EcoMicro, a miniature, self-powered, wireless inertial-sensing node in the volume of 8 x 13 x 9.5 mm3, including energy storage and solar cells. It is smaller than existing systems with similar functionality while retaining rich functionality and efficiency. It is capable of measuring motion using a inertial measurement unit (IMU) and communication over Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) protocol. It is self-powered by miniature solar cells and can perform maximum power point tracking (MPPT). Its integrated energy-storage device combines the longevity and power density of supercapacitors with the relatively flat discharge curve of batteries. Our power-ground gating circuit minimizes leakage current during sleep mode and is used in conjunction with the real-time-clock for duty cycling. Experimental results show EcoMicro to be operational and efficient for a class of wireless sensing applications.

References

  1. 2018. Flexwave. www.flexwave.com.tw/en__US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A Lazzarini Barnabei, Enrico Dallago, Piero Malcovati, and Alessandro Liberale. 2013. An improved ultra-low-power wireless sensor-station supplied by a photovoltaic harvester. In Ph. D. Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PRIME), 2013 9th Conference on. IEEE, 205--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Broadcom. {n. d.}. WICED Sense Bluetooth Smart Sensor tag kit. http://www.broadcom.com/products/wirelessconnectivity/bluetooth/wiced-sense.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chien-Ying Chen, Yu-Ting Chen, Yi-Hsuan Tu, Shun-Yao Yang, and Pai H Chou. 2009. EcoSpire: An application development kit for an ultra-compact wireless sensing system. IEEE Embedded Systems Letters 1, 3 (2009), 65--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chien-Ying Chen and Pai H. Chou. 2010. DuraCap: a supercapacitor-based, power-bootstrapping, maximum power point tracking energy-harvesting system. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design. ACM, 313--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Enrico Dallago, Alessandro Lazzarini Barnabei, Alessandro Liberale, Guido Torelli, and Giuseppe Venchi. 2016. A 300-mV low-power management system for energy harvesting applications. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 31, 3 (2016), 2273--2281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dialog Semiconductor. 2015. DA14580 Low Power Bluetooth Smart SoC. https://support.dialog-semiconductor.com/downloads/DA14580_DS_v1.63.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mohammad Hassan Ghaed, Gregory Chen, Razi-ul Haque, Michael Wieckowski, Yejoong Kim, Gyouho Kim, Yoonmyung Lee, Inhee Lee, David Fick, and Daeyeon Kim. 2013. Circuits for a cubic-millimeter energy-autonomous wireless intraocular pressure monitor. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers 60, 12 (2013), 3152--3162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jason Hsu, Sadaf Zahedi, Aman Kansal, Mani Srivastava, and Vijay Raghunathan. 2006. Adaptive duty cycling for energy harvesting systems. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design. ACM, 180--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. InvenSence. 2017. ICM-20948-World's Lowest Power 9-Axis MEMS MotionTracking™ Device. https://store.invensense.com/datasheets/invensense/DS-000189-ICM-20948-v1.2.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Xiaofan Jiang, Joseph Polastre, and David Culler. 2005. Perpetual environmentally powered sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE Press, 65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Petar Jokic and Michele Magno. 2017. Powering smart wearable systems with flexible solar energy harvesting. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sehwan Kim and Pai H Chou. 2011. Energy harvesting by sweeping voltage-escalated charging of a reconfigurable supercapacitor array. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design. IEEE Press, 235--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Young Jin Kim, Kyun Dae Kim, Sung Hoon Kim, SeungGwan Lee, and Hyon Soo Lee. 2017. Golf swing analysis system with a dual band and motion analysis algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 63, 3 (2017), 309--317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dexin Li and Pai H. Chou. 2004. Maximizing efficiency of solar-powered systems by load matching. In Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design. ACM, 162--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Yu-Te Liao, Huanfen Yao, Andrew Lingley, Babak Parviz, and Brian P Otis. 2012. A 3-μW CMOS Glucose Sensor for Wireless Contact-Lens Tear Glucose Monitoring. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 47, 1 (2012), 335--344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alessandro Liberale, Enrico Dallago, and Alessandro Lazzarini Barnabei. 2014. Energy harvesting system for wireless body sensor nodes. In Proc. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS). IEEE, 416--419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kris Lin, Jennifer Yu, Jason Hsu, Sadaf Zahedi, David Lee, Jonathan Friedman, Aman Kansal, Vijay Raghunathan, and Mani Srivastava. 2005. Heliomote: enabling long-lived sensor networks through solar energy harvesting. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 309--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Krzysztof Marcinek, Maciej Plasota, Andrzej Wielgus, and Witold Pleskacz. 2015. Implementation of the ADELITE Microcontroller for Biomedical Applications. In 2015 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits & Systems (DDECS). IEEE, 271--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Chulsung Park and Pai H. Chou. 2006. Ambimax: Autonomous energy harvesting platform for multi-supply wireless sensor nodes. In Proc. 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), Vol. 1. IEEE, 168--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sougata Sen, Vigneshwaran Subbaraju, Archan Misra, Rajesh Krishna Balan, and Youngki Lee. 2015. The case for smartwatch-based diet monitoring. In Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 585--590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ryo Shigeta, Tatsuya Sasaki, Duong Minh Quan, Yoshihiro Kawahara, Rushi J Vyas, Manos M Tentzeris, and Tohru Asami. 2013. Ambient RF energy harvesting sensor device with capacitor-leakage-aware duty cycle control. IEEE Sensors Journal 13, 8 (2013), 2973--2983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Silicon Laboratories. 2018. Bluegiga BLE112 Bluetooth Smart Module. https://www.silabs.com/products/wireless/bluetooth/bluetooth-low-energy-modules/ble112-bluetooth-smart-module.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Farhan Simjee and Pai H. Chou. 2006. Everlast: long-life, supercapacitor-operated wireless sensor node. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design. IEEE, 197--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Texas Instruments. 2014. CC2541 SensorTag Development Kit. http://www.ti.com/tool/CC2541DK-SENSOR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Texas Instruments. 2015. BQ25504 Ultra Low-Power Boost Converter With Battery Management for Energy Harvester Applications. http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/bq25504.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Anping Wang, Yu-Ting Huang, Cheng-Ting Lee, Hen-Pai Hsu, and Pai H Chou. 2014. EcoBT: Miniature, versatile mote platform based on Bluetooth Low Energy Technology. In Internet of Things (iThings), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, and Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), IEEE and Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom), IEEE. IEEE, 148--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Cheng Zhang, Anandghan Waghmare, Pranav Kundra, Yiming Pu, Scott Gilliland, Thomas Ploetz, Thad E Starner, Omer T Inan, and Gregory D Abowd. 2017. FingerSound: Recognizing unistroke thumb gestures using a ring. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ziguo Zhong, Ting Zhu, Tian He, and Zhi-Li Zhang. 2008. Leakage-aware energy synchronization on Twin-Star nodes. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, 351--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. EcoMicro: A Miniature Self-Powered Inertial Sensor Node Based on Bluetooth Low Energy

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ISLPED '18: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design
        July 2018
        327 pages
        ISBN:9781450357043
        DOI:10.1145/3218603

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        © 2018 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 July 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,159submissions,34%

        Upcoming Conference

        ISLPED '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader