skip to main content
10.1145/3224207.3224212acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdpaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis of Multi-Sensor Fusion for Mobile and Wearable Sensor Based Human Activity Recognition

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sensor-based human activity monitoring and detection have become an emerging field of intense research and development in recent years due to its immense applications in wide area of human endeavors. Human activity recognition integrates diverse sensors with machine learning algorithms to provide contextual information on relative activity details for health-related feedbacks and lifestyles changes. However, there are varieties of sensors for implementing human activity recognition with diverse capabilities and types of activities they provide best performances. Also, the diverse nature of human activities and nature in which they are performed by the individual makes them challenging to recognize. Therefore, determining the impact of these sensors in human activity recognition using machine learning techniques are of immense advantages in human activity monitoring and detection. The objective of this paper is to comprehensively evaluate the performance of single and multi-sensor fusion for human activity recognition using accelerometer and gyroscope sensors. Firstly, the performances of these sensors were extensively analyzed individually using seven classification algorithms. Secondly, we conducted a comprehensive experimental evaluation of sensor fusion attached on the same location and on different locations of the body. The extensive evaluation with 10-fold cross validation demonstrates that highest average F-measures for single sensor and fusion are 0.908 and 0.938 with Random Forest and Voting ensemble algorithms respectively. Furthermore, the fusion of heterogeneous sensors attached to different locations of the body shows Chest and Hip sensors fusion achieves an average F-measure of 0.942 and classification accuracy of 94.23% using Random Forest algorithm. The outcome of our experimental evaluation shows the significant impact of multi-sensor fusion for human activity monitoring and detection.

References

  1. L. Cao, Y. Wang, B. Zhang, Q. Jin, and A. V. Vasilakos, "GCHAR: An efficient Group-based Context--aware human activity recognition on smartphone," Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. E. Garcia-Ceja, C. E. Galván-Tejada, and R. Brena, "Multi-view stacking for activity recognition with sound and accelerometer data," Information Fusion, vol. 40, pp. 45--56, 2018/03/01/ 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Sun and B. Wang, "Indoor corner recognition from crowdsourced trajectories using smartphone sensors," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 82, pp. 266--277, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. F. Nweke, Y. W. Teh, G. Mujtaba, and M. A. Al-garadi, "Data fusion and multiple classifier systems for human activity detection and health monitoring: Review and open research directions," Information Fusion, vol. 46, pp. 147--170, 2019/03/01/ 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. K. Chowdhury, D. Tjondronegoro, V. Chandran, and S. G. Trost, "Ensemble Methods for Classification of Physical Activities from Wrist Accelerometry," Medicine and science in sports and exercise, vol. 49, p. 1965, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. O. Baños, M. Damas, H. Pomares, and I. Rojas, "Activity recognition based on a multi-sensor meta-classifier," in International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 2013, pp. 208--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Bulling, U. Blanke, and B. Schiele, "A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors," ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 46, pp. 1--33, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Janidarmian, A. R. Fekr, K. Radecka, and Z. Zilic, "A Comprehensive Analysis on Wearable Acceleration Sensors in Human Activity Recognition," Sensors, vol. 17, p. 26, Mar 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. Zhu and W. Sheng, "Multi-sensor fusion for human daily activity recognition in robot-assisted living," in 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2009, pp. 303--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Spinsante, A. Angelici, J. Lundstrom, M. Espinilla, I. Cleland, and C. Nugent, "A Mobile Application for Easy Design and Testing of Algorithms to Monitor Physical Activity in the Workplace," Mobile Information Systems, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Shoaib, S. Bosch, H. Scholten, P. J. Havinga, and O. D. Incel, "Towards detection of bad habits by fusing smartphone and smartwatch sensors," in Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, 2015, pp. 591--596.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Altun and B. Barshan, "Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial/Magnetic Sensor Units," in Human Behavior Understanding: First International Workshop, HBU 2010, Istanbul, Turkey, August 22, 2010. Proceedings, A. A. Salah, T. Gevers, N. Sebe, and A. Vinciarelli, Eds., ed Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 38--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. J. Ordonez and D. Roggen, "Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition," Sensors (Basel), vol. 16, Jan 18 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H. F. Nweke, Y. W. Teh, M. A. Al-garadi, and U. R. Alo, "Deep learning algorithms for human activity recognition using mobile and wearable sensor networks: State of the art and research challenges," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 105, pp. 233--261, 2018/09/01/ 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. Shoaib, S. Bosch, O. D. Incel, H. Scholten, and P. J. Havinga, "Complex Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone and Wrist-Worn Motion Sensors," Sensors (Basel), vol. 16, p. 426, Mar 24 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. H. Leutheuser, D. Schuldhaus, and B. M. Eskofier, "Hierarchical, multi-sensor based classification of daily life activities: comparison with state-of-the-art algorithms using a benchmark dataset," PloS one, vol. 8, p. e75196, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. O. Banos, J.-M. Galvez, M. Damas, H. Pomares, and I. Rojas, "Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition," Sensors, vol. 14, p. 6474, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. H. Witten, "The WEKA data mining software: an update," ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter, vol. 11, pp. 10--18, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. E. Zdravevski, P. Lameski, V. Trajkovik, A. Kulakov, I. Chorbev, R. Goleva, et al., "Improving Activity Recognition Accuracy in Ambient-Assisted Living Systems by Automated Feature Engineering," Ieee Access, vol. 5, pp. 5262--5280, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. G. Mujtaba, L. Shuib, R. G. Raj, R. Rajandram, and K. Shaikh, "Prediction of cause of death from forensic autopsy reports using text classification techniques: A comparative study," Journal of forensic and legal medicine, vol. 57, pp. 41--50, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Analysis of Multi-Sensor Fusion for Mobile and Wearable Sensor Based Human Activity Recognition

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICDPA 2018: Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Processing and Applications
      May 2018
      73 pages
      ISBN:9781450364188
      DOI:10.1145/3224207

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 May 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader