skip to main content
research-article

Toward Affective Handles for Tuning Vibrations

Published:24 July 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

When refining or personalizing a design, we count on being able to modify or move an element by changing its parameters rather than creating it anew in a different form or location—a standard utility in graphic and auditory authoring tools. Similarly, we need to tune vibrotactile sensations to fit new use cases, distinguish members of communicative icon sets, and personalize items. For tactile vibration display, however, we lack knowledge of the human perceptual mappings that must underlie such tools. Based on evidence that affective dimensions are a natural way to tune vibrations for practical purposes, we attempted to manipulate perception along three emotion dimensions (agitation, liveliness, and strangeness) using engineering parameters of hypothesized relevance. Results from two user studies show that an automatable algorithm can increase a vibration’s perceived agitation and liveliness to different degrees via signal energy, while increasing its discontinuity or randomness makes it more strange. These continuous mappings apply across diverse base vibrations; the extent of achievable emotion change varies. These results illustrate the potential for developing vibrotactile emotion controls as efficient tuning for designers and end-users.

References

  1. Audacity. 2015. Audacity software. Retrieved January 24, 2015 from http://audacity.sourceforge.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jan O. Blom and Andrew F. Monk. 2003. Theory of personalization of appearance: Why users personalize their pcs and mobile phones. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 18, 3 (2003), 193--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lorna M. Brown, Stephen A. Brewster, and Helen C. Purchase. 2006. Tactile crescendos and sforzandos: Applying musical techniques to tactile icon design. In CHI’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’6). 610--615. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Brunet, C. Megard, S. Paneels, G. Changeon, J. Lozada, M. P. Daniel, and F. Darses. 2013. Invitation to the voyage: The design of tactile metaphors to fulfill occasional travelers’ needs in transportation networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC’13). 259--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrew Chan, Karon MacLean, and Joanna McGrenere. 2008. Designing haptic icons to support collaborative turn-taking. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 66, 5 (2008), 333--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. W. J. Conover and Ronald L. Iman. 1981. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am. Stat. 35, 3 (1981), 124--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. EAI. 2015. Engineering Acoustics, Inc. Retrieved January 24, 2015 from http://www.atactech.com/PR_tactors.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Martin Evening. 2013. The Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 Book: The Complete Guide for Photographers. Pearson Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Google. 2016. Google Play Music. Retrieved October 21, 2016 from play.google.com/music/listen#/now.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Matthew J. Hertenstein and Sandra J. Weiss. 2011. The Handbook of Touch: Neuroscience, Behavioral, and Health Perspectives. Springer Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Eve Hoggan and Stephen Brewster. 2007. Designing audio and tactile crossmodal icons for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI’07). 162--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Instagram. 2016. Instagram. Retrieved October 21, 2016 from https://www.instagram.com/?hl&equal;en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ali Israr, Siyan Zhao, Kaitlyn Schwalje, Roberta Klatzky, and Jill Lehman. 2014. Feel effects: Enriching storytelling with haptic feedback. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 11, 3 (2014), 11:1--11:17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Emilia Koskinen, Topi Kaaresoja, and Pauli Laitinen. 2008. Feel-good touch: Finding the most pleasant tactile feedback for a mobile touch screen button. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 297--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dae H. Kwak, Galen E. Clavio, Andrea N. Eagleman, and Ki T. Kim. 2010. Exploring the antecedents and consequences of personalizing sport video game experiences. Sport Market. Quart. 19, 4 (12 2010), 217--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaebong Lee, J. Ryu, and S. Choi. 2009. Vibrotactile score: A score metaphor for designing vibrotactile patterns. In Proceedings of the IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC’09). 302--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Henry Lieberman, Fabio Paternò, Markus Klann, and Volker Wulf. 2006. End-user development: An emerging paradigm. In End User Development. Springer, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wendy E. Mackay. 1991. Triggers and barriers to customizing software. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’91). 153--160. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;108867 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Karon E. MacLean, Oliver Schneider, and Hasti Seifi. 2017. Multisensory haptic interactions:Understanding the sense and designing for It. In The Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces. ACM Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sampada Marathe and S. Shyam Sundar. 2011. What drives customization?: Control or identity? In Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). 781--790. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;1979056 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Francis McGlone, Ake B. Vallbo, Hakan Olausson, Line Loken, and Johan Wessberg. 2007. Discriminative touch and emotional touch. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 3 (2007), 173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Joanna McGrenere, Ronald M. Baecker, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2007. A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 14, 1 (2007), 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. MoodFuse. 2016. MoodFuse. Retrieved October 21, 2016 from moodfuse.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Musicovery. 2016. Musicovery. Retrieved October 21, 2016 from http://musicovery.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Piia Nurkka. 2013. “Nobody other than me knows what i want”: Customizing a sports watch. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT’13). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8120. Springer, Berlin, 384--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Uran Oh and Leah Findlater. 2013. The challenges and potential of end-user gesture customization. In Proceedings of Athe CM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). 1129--1138. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;2466145 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Conor O’Sullivan and Angela Chang. 2006. An Activity Classification for Vibrotactile Phenomena. Springer, Berlin, 145--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Olli Parviainen. 2016. SoundTouch Algorithm. Retrieved September 24, 2016 from http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Mark Paterson. 2007. The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies. Berg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Photoshop. 2016. Adobe Photoshop. Retrieved October 23, 2016 from https://www.adobe.com/ca/products/photoshop.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Propellerhead. 2016. Figure, on Google Play Store. Retrieved October 21, 2016 from https://www.propellerheads.se/products/figure/manual/introduction/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jonghyun Ryu, Jaemin Chun, Gunhyuk Park, Seungmoon Choi, and Sung H. Han. 2010. Vibrotactile feedback for information delivery in the vehicle. IEEE Trans. Haptics 3, 2 (Apr. 2010), 138--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Greg Saul, Manfred Lau, Jun Mitani, and Takeo Igarashi. 2011. SketchChair: An all-in-one chair design system for end users. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’11). 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Oliver S. Schneider, Ali Israr, and Karon E. MacLean. 2015. Tactile animation by direct manipulation of grid displays. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’15). 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Oliver S. Schneider and Karon E. MacLean. 2014. Improvising design with a haptic instrument. In Proceedings of the IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS’14). 327--332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Oliver S. Schneider and Karon E. MacLean. 2016. Studying design process and example use with macaron, a web-based vibrotactile effect editor. In Proceedings of the IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS’16). 52--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Oliver S. Schneider, Hasti Seifi, Salma Kashani, Matthew Chun, and Karon E. MacLean. 2016. HapTurk: Crowdsourcing affective ratings of vibrotactile icons. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). 3248--3260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Hasti Seifi, Chamila Anthonypillai, and Karon E. MacLean. 2014. End-user customization of affective tactile messages: A qualitative examination of tool parameters. In Proceedings of IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS’14). 251--256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hasti Seifi and Karon E. MacLean. 2017. Exploiting haptic facets: Users’ sensemaking schemas as a path to design and personalization of experience (unpublished).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Hasti Seifi, Kailun Zhang, and Karon E. MacLean. 2015. VibViz: Organizing, visualizing and navigating vibration libraries. In Proceedings of the IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC’15). 254--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Snapseed. 2016. Snapseed, on Google Play Store. Retrieved October 21, 2016 from https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/snapseed/id439438619?mt&equal;8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Diane Tam, Karon E. MacLean, Joanna McGrenere, and Katherine J. Kuchenbecker. 2013. The design and field observation of a haptic notification system for timing awareness during oral presentations. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 1689--1698. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. David Ternes and Karon E. Maclean. 2008. Designing large sets of haptic icons with rhythm. In Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios. Springer, 199--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jan B. F. van Erp and Michiel M. A. Spapé. 2003. Distilling the underlying dimensions of tactile melodies. In Proceedings of Eurohaptics, Vol. 2003. 111--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J. Higgins. 2011. The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, 143--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Yongjae Yoo, Taekbeom Yoo, Jihyun Kong, and Seungmoon Choi. 2015. Emotional responses of tactile icons: Effects of amplitude, frequency, duration, and envelope. In Proceedings of the IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC’15). 235--240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Siyan Zhao, Oliver Schneider, Roberta Klatzky, Jill Lehman, and Ali Israr. 2014. FeelCraft: Crafting tactile experiences for media using a feel effect library. In Proceedings of the Adjunct Publication of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’14). ACM, New York, NY, 51--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Ying Zheng and John B. Morrell. 2012. Haptic actuator design parameters that influence affect and attention. In Proceedings of the IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS’12). IEEE, 463--470.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Toward Affective Handles for Tuning Vibrations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
      ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 15, Issue 3
      July 2018
      144 pages
      ISSN:1544-3558
      EISSN:1544-3965
      DOI:10.1145/3208320
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 July 2018
      • Accepted: 1 April 2018
      • Revised: 1 January 2018
      • Received: 1 February 2017
      Published in tap Volume 15, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader