skip to main content
10.1145/3231644.3231688acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Contemporary online course design recommendations to support women's cognitive development

Published:26 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Originally, online higher education was imagined to be a utopia for women because gender would be less salient when learners were not physically co-present and thus gender power issues would be lessened. Unfortunately, gender power is present in online classes, hindering women from experiencing the benefits of an equitable learning environment. One approach to eliminating gender power in online classes is to design courses with gender equity in mind. The existing best practices for designing online courses, however, were not developed for the specific purpose of upending gender power. In this poster, I synthesize the best practices for online course design and pose recommendations informed by feminist pedagogy. As more faculty are encouraged to teach online, an updated set of design recommendations that best supports women online learners is valuable both for practitioners and researchers.

References

  1. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. (Eds.). (2013). Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research, and practice. Hershey, PA.: Information Science Reference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chick, N., & Hassel, H. (2009). Don't hate me because I'm virtual: Feminist pedagogy in the online classroom. Feminist Teacher, 19(3), 195--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin, 3, 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eudey, B. (2012). Civic engagement, cyberfeminism, and online learning: Activism and service learning in women's and gender studies courses. Feminist Teacher, 22(3), 233--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2--3), 87--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Herman, C., & Kirkup, G. (2018). Combining feminist pedagogy and transactional distance to create gender-sensitive technology-enhanced learning. Gender and Education, 29(6), 781--795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Herring S.C. (1993) Gender and democracy in computer- mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication {Online}, 3(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Luttrell, W. (1989). Working-class women's ways of knowing: Effects of gender, race, and class. Source: Sociology of Education Special Issue on Gender and Education, 62(1), 33--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. MarylandOnline. (2018). About. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/aboutGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Perkowski, J. (2012). The role of gender in distance learning: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in academic performance and self-efficacy in distance learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 41(3), 267--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Pruitt, R. (2017). Constructivist approaches online and face-to-face: The essential role of trust. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 19(2), 105--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Snyder, T.D., de Brey, C., and Dillow, S.A. (2016). Digest of education statistics 2015 (NCES 2016--014). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. von Prümmer, C. (2004). Gender issues and learning online. In J. E. Brindley, C. Walti, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Learner support in open, distance, and online learning environments (179--192). Oldenburg: Biblioteks- und Informations system der Universität Oldenburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wojahn, P. G. (1994). Computer-mediated communication: The great equalizer between men and women? Technical Communication, 41 (Fourth Quarter), 747--752.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    L@S '18: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale
    June 2018
    391 pages
    ISBN:9781450358866
    DOI:10.1145/3231644

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 June 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    L@S '18 Paper Acceptance Rate24of58submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader