skip to main content
10.1145/3232617.3232619acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslimitsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The afordable DIY resilient smart garden kit

Published:13 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Our climate is changing rapidly, and the effects of that have shown themselves through the droughts in California. In an effort to become more resilient, people become more interested in growing their own food, but do not have sufficient gardening experience and education on conserving water. Previous work has attempted to develop resilient smart gardens that support the user in automated watering using simple embedded boards. However, none of these solutions proved to be scalable nor are they easy to replicate for people at home. We developed a smart resilient garden kit with IoT devices that is easy to rebuild and scales up. We use an Arduino board and a number of sensors connected to a planter. Data gets stored in a local database and is accessible via a web app and a web page. The resilient smart garden provides a learning environment that helps bridging between computer science and this sustainability-centric application domain.

In this paper, we report on an educational blueprint for multidisciplinary projects, our experiences with self-guided implementation and refection meetings, and our lessons learned.

References

  1. W. Neil Adger, Nigel W. Arnell, and Emma L. Tompkins. 2005. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. (2005), 77--86 pages. arXiv:1307.3552Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amberg Thomas. 2016. Augmented Water. (2016). http://www.instructables.com/id/Augmented-Water/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Muhammad Aqib. 2017. Advanced Garduino with Data Logging to Database. (2017). https://www.hackster.io/muhammad-aqib/advanced-garduino-with-data-logging-to-database-9adf69Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Z. Attari. 2014. Perceptions of water use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 14 (2014), 5129--5134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jef Atwood. 2012. Rubber Duck Problem Solving. (2012). https://rubberduckdebugging.com/https://blog.codinghorror.com/rubber-duck-problem-solving/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Filipe Caetano, Rui Pitarma, and Pedro Reis. 2015. Advanced system for garden irrigation management. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 353. 565--574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Carson Miller. 2015. Automated Aquaponics Design Report. Technical Report. http://muse.union.edu/carsonmiller/files/2014/08/ECE-499-Final-Paper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Susan Crate and Mark Nuttal. 2012. Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions; Political Theory and Global Climate Change. Ethics, Policy & Environment 15, 1 (2012), 125--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. V. Daniels. 2016. Automatic Garden Watering Device - Arduino. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. G R Dixon, R H Collier, and I Bhattacharya. 2014. An assessment of the effects of climate change on horticulture. In Horticulture: Plants for People and Places. Vol. 2. 817--857.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Elena Domene, David Saurí, and Marc Parés. 2005. Urbanization and Sustainable Resource Use: The Case of Garden Watering in the Metropolitan Region of Barcelona. Urban Geography 26, 6 (2005), 520--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Xiao Juan Duan. 2014. Research on IOT-Based Smart Garden Project. Computer-Aided Design, Manufacturing, Modeling and Simulation IV 608 (2014), 321--325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E2i Creative Studio. 2013. Connected Garden. (2013). http://e2i.ist.ucf.edu/project/8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Edyn. 10 October 2017. Edyn. (10 October 2017). https://edyn.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Liangxin Fan, Fei Wang, Guobin Liu, Xiaomei Yang, and Wei Qin. 2014. Public Perception of Water Consumption and Its Efects on Water Conservation Behavior. Water 6, 6 (2014), 1771--1784.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. GreenIq. 2017. GreenIq. (2017). http://greeniq.co/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamza, A. 2017. How to Make an Arduino Temperature Data Logger. (2017). https://diyhacking.com/make-arduino-temperature-data-logger/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Siobhan Hatton-Jones and Min Teah. 2015. Case analysis of the do-it-yourself industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 27, 5 (2015), 826--838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Richard Howitt, Josué Medellín-azuara, and Duncan Macewan. 2014. Economic Analysis of the 2014 Drought for California Agriculture. Center for Watershed Sciences. University of California, Davis, California (2014), 20p. http://watershed.ucdavis.eduGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Iseman, L. 2012. Garduino: Geek Gardening with Arduino. (2012). https://makezine.com/projects/make-18/garduino-geek-gardening/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Legislative Analyst's Office. 2016. The 2016-17 Budget: The State's Drought Response. Technical Report. Legislative Analyst's Office. http://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2016/3343/drought-response-020516.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Maleficarum Maleus (pseudonym). 2016. Water Saving System Using Arduino. (2016). http://www.instructables.com/id/Water-Saving-System-Using-Arduino/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonathan Margolis. 2012. Growing food in the desert: is this the solution to the world's food crisis. (2012). https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/growing-food-in-the-desert-is-this-the-solution-to-the-worlds-food-crisisGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Maira Marques, Sergio Ochoa, Maria Cecilia Bastarrica, and Francisco Gutierrez. accepted for publication in 2017. Enhancing the Student Learning Experience in Software Engineering Project Courses. IEEE Transactions on Education (accepted for publication in 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2017. Personal Food Computers. (2017). https://wiki.openag.media.mit.edu/personalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mary H. Meyer, Douglas Needham, John Dole, Brain Trader, Jennifer Fox, Marnie Conley, Michael Nef, and Jean Shaw. 2016. Importance of horticulture and perception as a career. HortTechnology 26, 2 (2016), 114--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Bill Mollison and David Holmgren. 1978. Permaculture. Lesmurdie Progress Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. National Institute of Food and Agriculture. 1893. USDA Defnition of Specialty Crop. (1893). https://nifa.usda.gov/sites/default/fles/resources/defnitionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Palmer Andrew. 2015. Smart Sprinkler: Water Saving Irrigation Controller for Residential Use. (2015). https://people.ece.cornell.edu/land/courses/eceprojectsland/STUDENTPROJ/2014to2015/ajp294/smartGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Camille Parmesan. 2006. Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37, 1 (dec 2006), 637--669.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Pollinator Partnership. 2017. Bee Smart Kit for elementary school kids. http://pollinator.org/bee-smart, last accessed on Feb 8th, 2018. (October 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. William E Rees. 2010. Thinking "resilience". The post carbon reader: managing the 21st century's sustainability crises. Watershed Media, Post Carbon Institute, Santa Rosa (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. J. Sardans and J. Peñuelas. 2005. Drought decreases soil enzyme activity in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex L. forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37, 3 (2005), 455--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. The National Gardening Association. 2014. National Gardenting Association Special Report: Garden to Table: A 5 Year Look at Food Gardening in America. (2014), 24. https://garden.org/special/pdf/2014-NGA-Garden-to-Table.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Tower Garden. 2017. 6 Reasons Tower Garden Is a Great Teaching Tool. (2017). http://www.towergarden.com/grow/school-gardensGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Reinier van der Lee and Gallardo Patricio. 2015. Vinduino, a wine grower's water saving project. (2015). https://hackaday.io/project/6444-vinduino-a-wine-growers-water-saving-projectGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaomine Vang and David Zoldoske. {n. d.}. Irrigation Management. ({n. d.}). http://agwaterstewards.org/practices/irrigationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Ankit Vashista, Harsh Rathore, and Gaurav Jain. 2016. Automatic Gardening System using Arduino. SSRG International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering 3, 8 (2016), 119--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The afordable DIY resilient smart garden kit

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        LIMITS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Computing within Limits
        May 2018
        95 pages
        ISBN:9781450365758
        DOI:10.1145/3232617

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 May 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        LIMITS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate11of17submissions,65%Overall Acceptance Rate11of17submissions,65%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader