skip to main content
10.1145/3240167.3240233acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparison of two smartphone time-picking interfaces: convention versus efficiency

Published:29 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Alarm clocks are important aids that helps us keep a regular routine. This study explores two time-picking interfaces available on Android Smartphones, namely the digit-wheel and dial time-pickers. The digit-wheel time-picker exploits the traditional digit alarm clock metaphor where one cycles through a wheel of hours and a wheel of minutes using multiple small gestures. The dial time-picker is inspired by the analogue clock face and utilizes the real estate of the touch display though single gestures. A mixed experimental design was carried out to compare the efficiency of the two interfaces. The results show that on the first attempt, the digit-wheel time-picker is faster than the dial time-picker, but after a few attempts, the dial time-picker becomes significantly faster than the digit-wheel time-picker. Prior experience with the dial interface had only an interaction effect on the results.

References

  1. Adam Drabek, Ondrej Krejcar, Ali Selamat, and Kamil Kuca. 2016. A smart arduino alarm clock using hypnagogia detection during night. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems. Springer, Cham, 514--526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Fabian Hemmert, Susann Hamann, and Reto Wettach. 2009. The digital hourglass. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mohd Imran, Md Shadab, Md Mojahid Islam, and Misbahul Haque. 2017. Skin Detection Based Intelligent Alarm Clock Using YCbCr Model. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Cham, 227--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kristin Klauser and Vanessa Walker. 2007. It's about time: an affective and desirable alarm clock. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces (DPPI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 407--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brian M. Landry, Jeffrey S. Pierce, and Charles L. Isbell, Jr.. 2004. Supporting routine decision-making with a next-generation alarm clock. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8, 3--4 (July 2004), 154--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Vincent Levesque, Louise Oram, Karon MacLean, Andy Cockburn, Nicholas Marchuk, Dan Johnson, J. Edward Colgate, and Michael Peshkin. 2011. Frictional widgets: enhancing touch interfaces with programmable friction. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1153--1158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kursat F. Ozenc, James P. Brommer, Bong-keum Jeong, Nina Shih, Karen Au, and John Zimmerman. 2007. Reverse alarm clock: a research through design example of designing for the self. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces (DPPI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 392--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gary Scott, and Jeannette Chin. 2013. A DIY approach to pervasive computing for the Internet of Things: A smart alarm clock. In Proceedings of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference (CEEC), 2013 5<sup>th</sup>. IEEE, 57--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Steven C. Seow. 2008. Designing and engineering time: The psychology of time perception in software. Addison-Wesley Professional. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Aiko Fallas Yamashita, Wolmet Barendregt, and Morten Fjeld. 2007. Exploring potential usability gaps when switching mobile phones: an empirical study. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI... but not as we know it - Volume 1 (BCS-HCI '07), Vol. 1. British Computer Society, Swinton, UK, UK, 109--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yi-Hsuan Yeh, Dong-Hwa Lu, and Jui-Chung Hung. 2012. Combining Fuzzy Systems and Social Networking Sites Design to Alarm Clocks Using the Android System. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C). IEEE, 28--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jan Zekveld, Mathias Funk, and Saskia Bakker. 2016. The Tumble Clock: Bringing Users in Touch with their Snooze Time. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 900--904. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lan Zhang, and Henry Leung. 2004. Smart alarm clock-a networked home appliance with bluetooth connection. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics. IEEE, 563--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NordiCHI '18: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    September 2018
    1002 pages
    ISBN:9781450364379
    DOI:10.1145/3240167

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 September 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    NordiCHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate59of240submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader