skip to main content
10.1145/3240765.3243486guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Multi-Physics-based FEM Analysis for Post-voiding Analysis of Electromigration Failure Effects

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a new multi-physics finite element method (FEM) based analysis method for void growth simulation of confined copper interconnects. This new method for the first time considers three important physics simultaneously in the EM failure process and their time-varying interactions: the hydrostatic stress in the confined interconnect wire, the current density and Joule heating induced temperature. As a result, we end up with solving a set of coupled partial differential equations which consist of the stress diffusion equation (Korhonen's equation), the phase field equation (for modeling void boundary move), the Laplace equation for current density and the heat diffusion equation for Joule heating and wire temperature. In the new method, we show that each of the physics will have different physical domains and differential boundary conditions, and how such coupled multi-physics transient analysis was carried out based on FEM and different time scales are properly handled. Experiment results show that by considering all three coupled physics - the stress, current density, and temperature - and their transient behaviors, the proposed FEM EM solver can predict the unique transient wire resistance change pattern for copper interconnect wires, which were well observed by the published experiment data. We also show that the simulated void growth speed is less conservative than recently proposed compact EM model.

References

  1. [1].Alnæs Martin S., Blechta Jan, Hake Johan, Johansson August, Kehlet Benjamin, Logg Anders, Richardson Chris, Ring Johannes, Rognes Marie E., and Wells Garth N.. 2015. The FEniCS Project Version 1.5. Archive of Numerical Software 3, 100 (2015). https://doi.org/10.11588/ans.2015.100.20553Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2].Amrouch Hussam and Henkel Jörg. 2018. Estimating and Optimizing BTI Aging Effects: From Physics to CAD. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3].Bergman T., Lavine A., Incropera F.P., and DeWitt D.P.. 2011. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. John Wiley & Son.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4].Bhate Deepali N, Bower Allen F, and Kumar Ashish. 2002. A phase eld model for failure in interconnect lines due to coupled di usion mechanisms. Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids (July 2002), 127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5].Black J.R.. 1969. Electromigration-A brief survey and some recent results. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 16, 4 (1969), 338347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6].Blech I.A.. 1976. Electromigration in thin aluminum films on titanium nitride. Journal of Applied Physics 47, 4 (1976), 12031208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7].Chen C., Tan S.X.-D., Peng J., Kim T., and Chen J.. 2017. Analytical modeling of electromigration failure for VLSI interconnect tree considering temperature and segment length effects. IEEE Transaction on Device and Materials Reliability (T-DMR) 17, 4 (Dec. 2017), 653666.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8].Chen H., Tan S.X.-D., Huang X., Kim T., and Sukharev V.. 2016. Analytical Modeling and Characterization of Electromigration Effects for Multibranch Interconnect Trees. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 35, 11 (2016), 18111824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9].Cheng Y.K., Tsai C.H., Teng C.C., and Kang S.M.. 2000. Electrothermal Analysis of VLSI Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10].Cook C., Sun Z., Demircan E., Shroff M.D., and Tan S.X.-D.. 2018. Fast Electromigration Stress Evolution Analysis for Interconnect Trees Using Krylov Subspace Method. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11].Geuzaine Christophe and Remacle Jean-François. 2009. Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. International journal for numerical methods in engineering 79, 11 (2009), 13091331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12].Hu C-K, Small MB, and Ho PS. 1993. Electromigration in Al (Cu) two-level structures: Effect of Cu and kinetics of damage formation. Journal of applied physics 74, 2 (1993), 969978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13].Huang X., Kteyan A., Tan X., and Sukharev V.. 2016. Physics-based Electromigration Models and Full-chip Assessment for Power Grid Networks. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 35, 11 (Feb. 2016), 18481861. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2016.2524540DOIGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14].ITRS 2014. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), 2014 Update. http://public.itrs.netGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15].Korhonen MA, Borgesen P, Brown DD, and Li Che-Yu. 1993. Microstructure based statistical model of electromigration damage in confined line metallizations in the presence of thermally induced stresses. Journal of Applied Physics 74, 8 (1993), 499511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16].Korhonen M.A., Bo/rgesen P., Tu K.N., and Li C.-Y.. 1993. Stress evolution due to electromigration in confined metal lines. Journal of Applied Physics 73, 8 (1993), 37903799.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17].Lienig J. and Thiele M.. 2018. Fundamentals of Electromigration-Aware Integrated Circuit Design. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18].Mahfuzul A.K.M. and Onodera Hidetoshi. 2018. PVT2: Process, Voltage, Temperature and Time-dependent Variability in Scaled CMOS Process. In IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19].Mueller-Gritschneder Daniel, Sharif Uzair, and Schlichtmapp Ulf. 2018. Performance and Accuracy in Soft-Error Resilience Evaluation using the Multi-Level Processor Simulator ETISS-ML. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20].Ogawa Ennis T, Lee Ki-Don, Blaschke Volker A, and Ho Paul S. 2002. Electromigration reliability issues in dual-damascene Cu interconnections. IEEE Transactions on reliability 51, 4 (2002), 403419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21].Sukharev Valeriy, Kteyan Armen, and Huang Xin. 2016. Postvoiding stress evolution in confined metal lines. IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability 16, 1 (2016), 5060.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22].Sukharev Valeriy, Kteyan Armen, and Zschech Ehrenfried. 2012. Physics-Based Models for EM and SM Simulation in Three-Dimensional IC Structures. IEEE Trans. on Device and Materials Reliability 12, 2 (2012), 272284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23].Sun Z., Demircan E., Shroff M.D., Cook C., and Tan S.X.-D.. 2018. Fast Electromigration Immortality Analysis for Multi-Segment Copper Interconnect Wires. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24].Tan S.X.-D., Amrouch H., Kim T., Sun Z., Cook C., and Henkel J.. 2017. Recent advances in EM and BTI induced reliability modeling, analysis and optimization. Integration, the VLSI Journal (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vlsi.2017.08.009 in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25].Wang Ruopeng, Benner Thomas, Sorensen Alma Gregory, and Van Jay Wedeen. 2007. Diffusion toolkit: a software package for diffusion imaging data processing and tractography. In Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, Vol. 15. Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26].Wang X., Wang H., He J., Tan S.X.-D., Cai Y., and Yang S.. 2017. Physics-based Electromigration Modeling and Assessment for Multi-Segment Interconnects in Power Grid Networks. In Proc. Design, Automation and Test In Europe. (DATE).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27].Zhang L.. 2010. Effects of Scaling and Grain Structure on Electromigration Reliability of Cu Interconnects. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28].Zhao H. and Tan S.. 2018. Postvoiding FEM Analysis for Electromigration Failure Characterization. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multi-Physics-based FEM Analysis for Post-voiding Analysis of Electromigration Failure Effects
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image Guide Proceedings
            2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD)
            Nov 2018
            939 pages

            Copyright © 2018

            Publisher

            IEEE Press

            Publication History

            • Published: 5 November 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Qualifiers

            • research-article