skip to main content
10.1145/3242587.3242611acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multitasking with Play Write, a Mobile Microproductivity Writing Tool

Published:11 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile devices offer people the opportunity to get useful tasks done during time previously thought to be unusable. Because mobile devices have small screens and are often used in divided attention scenarios, people are limited to using them for short, simple tasks; complex tasks like editing a document present significant challenges in this environment. In this paper we demonstrate how a complex task requiring focused attention can be adapted to the fragmented way people work while mobile by decomposing the task into smaller, simpler microtasks. We introduce Play Write, a microproductivity tool that allows people to edit Word documents from their phones via such microtasks. When participants used Play Write while simultaneously watching a video, we found that they strongly preferred its microtask-based editing approach to the traditional editing experience offered by Mobile Word. Play Write made participants feel more productive and less stressed, and they completed more edits with it. Our findings suggest microproductivity tools like Play Write can help people be productive in divided attention scenarios.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

ufp1148p.mp4

mp4

7.2 MB

p411-iqbal.mp4

mp4

269.6 MB

References

  1. Michael S. Bernstein, Greg Little, Robert C. Miller, Björn Hartmann, Mark S. Ackerman, David R. Karger, David Crowell, and Katrina Panovich. 2010. Soylent: A word processor with a crowd inside. In Proceedings of UIST 2010. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Carrie J. Cai, Philip J. Guo, James R. Glass, and Robert C. Miller. 2015. Wait-learning: Leveraging wait time for second language education. In Proceedings of CHI 2015. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3701--3710. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Carrie J. Cai, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Jaime Teevan. 2016. Chain reactions: The impact of order on microtask chains. In Proc. CHI 2016. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3143--3154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Justin Cheng, Jaime Teevan, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2015. Break it down: A comparison of macro- and microtasks. In Proceedings of CHI 2015. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4061--4064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lydia B. Chilton, Greg Little, Darren Edge, Daniel S. Weld, and James A. Landay. 2013. Cascade: Crowdsourcing taxonomy creation. In Proceedings of CHI 2013. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Justin Cranshaw, Emad Elwany, Todd Newman, Rafal Kocielnik, Bowen Yu, Sandeep Soni, Jaime Teevan, Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2017. Calendar.help: Designing a workflow-based scheduling agent with humans in the loop. In Proceedings of CHI 2017. ACM, New York, NY, USA. 2382--2393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ed Cutrell, Mary Czerwinski, and Eric Horvitz. 2001. Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. In Proceedings of Interact 2001. 263--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mary Czerwinski, Eric Horvitz, and Susan Wilhite. 2004. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In Proceedings CHI 2004. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 175--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Laura Dabbish and Robert E. Kraut. 2004. Controlling interruptions: Awareness displays and social motivation for coordination. In Proceedings CSCW 2004. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 182--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Joan M. DiMicco, Werner Geyer, David R. Millen, Casey Dugan, and Beth Brownholtz. 2009. People sensemaking and relationship building on an enterprise social network site. In Proceedings of System Sciences 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Victor M. González and Gloria Mark. "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": Managing multiple working spheres. In Proceedings of CHI 2004. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nick Greer, Jaime Teevan, and Shamsi T. Iqbal. 2016. An introduction to technological support for writing. Microsoft Research Tech Report, MSR-TR-2016-001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shamsi T. Iqbal and Brian Bailey. Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks. In Proceedings of CHI 2008. ACM, New York, NY, USA. 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shamsi T. Iqbal and Eric Horvitz. 2007. Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: field study, analysis, and directions. In Proceedings of the CHI 2007. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 677--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Shamsi T. Iqbal, Yun-Cheng Ju, and Eric Horvitz. 2010. Cars, calls, and cognition: Investigating driving and divided attention. In Proceedings of CHI 2010. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1281--1290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bumsoo Kang, Wonjung Kim, Inseok Hwang, Chunjong Park, Seungchul Lee, Chulhong Min, Sung-Ju Lee, and Junehwa Song. 2017. Zaturi: Blending hours spent at work and hours devoted to children. In Proceedings of CSCW 2017 Companion. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Amy K. Karlson, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Brian Meyers, Gonzalo Ramos, Kathy Lee, and John C. Tang. 2010. Mobile taskflow in context: A screenshot study of smartphone usage. In Proceedings of CHI 2010. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2009--2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Harmanpreet Kaur, Alex C. Williams, Anne Loomis Thompson, Walter S. Lasecki, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Jaime Teevan. 2018. Creating Better Action Plans for Writing Tasks via Vocabulary-Based Planning. CSCW 2018, to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Joy Kim, Justin Cheng, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Ensemble: Exploring complementary strengths of leaders and crowds in creative collaboration. In Proceedings CSCW 2014. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 745--755. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Joy Kim, Sarah Sterman, Allegra Argent Beal Cohen, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2017. Mechanical Novel: Crowdsourcing complex work through reflection and revision. In Proceedings of CSCW 2017. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 233--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Aniket Kittur, Boris Smus, Susheel Khamkar, and Robert E. Kraut. 2011. CrowdForge: Crowdsourcing complex work. In Proceedings of UIST 2011. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Anand Kulkarni, Matthew Can, and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Collaboratively crowdsourcing workflows with Turkomatic. In Proceedings of CSCW 2012. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1003--1012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Luis Leiva, Matthias Böhmer, Sven Gehring, and Antonio Krüger. 2012. Back to the app: The costs of mobile application interruptions. In Proceedings of MobileHCI 2012. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 291--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rhema Linder, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Jaime Teevan. 2018. Outsider Perspectives: Crowd-Based Feedback for Writing. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Paper LBW031, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Greg Little, Lydia B. Chilton, Max Goldman, and Robert C. Miller. 2010. Exploring iterative and parallel human computation processes. In Proceedings of HCOMP 2010. 68--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Gloria Mark, Victor M. Gonzalez, and Justin Harris. 2005. No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. In Proceedings of CHI 2005. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 321--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Gloria Mark, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, Paul Johns, and Akane Sano. 2016. Neurotics can't focus: An in situ study of online multitasking in the workplace. In Proceedings of CHI 2016. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1739--1744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Abhinav Mehrotra, Veljko Pejovic, Jo Vermeulen, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2016. My phone and me: Understanding people's receptivity to mobile notifications. In Proceedings of CHI 2016. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1021--1032. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Michael Nebeling, Anhong Guo, Andrea To, Steven Dow, Jaime Teevan, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2016. WearWrite: Orchestrating the crowd to complete complex tasks from wearables. In Adjunct Proceedings of CHI 2016. ACM, New York, NY, 39--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Edward Newell and Derek Ruths. 2016. How one microtask affects another. In Proceedings of CHI 2016. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3155--3166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Antti Oulasvirta, Sakari Tamminen, Virpi Roto, and Jaana Kuorelahti. 2005. Interaction in 4-second bursts: The fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. In Proceedings of CHI 2005. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 919--928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sondra Perl. 1979. The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Niloufar Salehi, Jaime Teevan, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Ece Kamar. 2017. Communicating context to the crowd for complex writing tasks. In Proceedings of CSCW 2017. ACM, New York, NY, USA. 1890--1901. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Kaveri Subrahmanyam, Stephanie M. Reich, Natalia Waechter, and Guadalupe Espinoza. 2008. Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 6: 420--433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Jaime Teevan, Daniel J. Liebling, and Walter S. Lasecki. 2014. Selfsourcing personal tasks. In CHI 2014 Extended Abstracts. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2527--2532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jaime Teevan, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Curtis von Veh. 2016. Supporting collaborative writing with microtasks. In Proceedings of CHI 2016. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2657--2668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jaime Teevan. 2016. The future of microwork. XRDS 23, 2 (December 2016), 26--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jaime Teevan and Lisa Yu. 2017. Bringing the Wisdom of the Crowd to an Individual by Having the Individual Assume Different Roles. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 131--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. J. Gregory Trafton, Erik M. Altmann, Derek P. Brock, and Farilee E. Mintz. 2003. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. IJHCS 58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Alex C. Williams, Harmanpreet Kaur, Gloria Mark, Anne Loomis Thompson, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Jaime Teevan. 2018. Supporting Workplace Detachment and Reattachment with Conversational Intelligence. In Proc. of CHI 2017. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Paper 88, 13 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Rajan Vaish, Keith Wyngarden, Jingshu Chen, Brandon Cheung, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Twitch crowdsourcing: Crowd contributions in short bursts of time. In Proceedings of CHI 2014. ACM, New York, NY, USA. 3645--3654. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Fengpeng Yuan, Xianyi Gao, and Janne Lindqvist. 2017. How busy are you? Predicting the interruptibility intensity of mobile users. In Proceedings of CHI 2017. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5346--5360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multitasking with Play Write, a Mobile Microproductivity Writing Tool

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UIST '18: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
        October 2018
        1016 pages
        ISBN:9781450359481
        DOI:10.1145/3242587

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 October 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        UIST '18 Paper Acceptance Rate80of375submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        UIST '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader