skip to main content
10.1145/3242587.3242667acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HydroRing: Supporting Mixed Reality Haptics Using Liquid Flow

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Current haptic devices are often bulky and rigid, making them unsuitable for ubiquitous interaction and scenarios where the user must also interact with the real world. To address this gap, we propose HydroRing, an unobtrusive, finger-worn device that can provide the tactile sensations of pressure, vibration, and temperature on the fingertip, enabling mixed-reality haptic interactions. Different from previous explorations, HydroRing in active mode delivers sensations using liquid travelling through a thin, flexible latex tube worn across the fingerpad, and has minimal impact on a user's dexterity and their perception of stimuli in passive mode. Two studies evaluated participants' ability to perceive and recognize sensations generated by the device, as well as their ability to perceive physical stimuli while wearing the device. We conclude by exploring several applications leveraging this mixed-reality haptics approach.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

ufp1501.mp4

mp4

59.4 MB

ufp1501p.mp4

mp4

7.6 MB

p913-han.mp4

mp4

224.2 MB

References

  1. Merwan Achibet, Benoît Le Gouis, Maud Marchal, et al. 2017. FlexiFingers: Multi-finger interaction in VR combining passive haptics and pseudo-haptics. 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2017 IEEE Symposium on, IEEE, 103--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Evan Ackerman. 2018. Cyberdyne's Medical Exoskeleton Strides to FDA Approval. IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News. Retrieved April 4, 2018 from https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-human-os/biomedical/devices/cyberdynes-medical-exoskeleton-strides-to-fda-approvalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hideyuki Ando, Eisuke Kusachi, and Junji Watanabe. 2007. Nail-mounted tactile display for boundary/texture augmentation. Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology, ACM, 292--293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hideyuki Ando, Takeshi Miki, Masahiko Inami, and Taro Maeda. 2002. The nail-mounted tactile display for the behavior modeling. ACM SIGGRAPH 2002 conference abstracts and applications, ACM, 264--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hrvoje Benko, Christian Holz, Mike Sinclair, and Eyal Ofek. 2016. Normaltouch and texturetouch: High-fidelity 3d haptic shape rendering on handheld virtual reality controllers. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 717--728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Carlos Bermejo and Pan Hui. 2017. A survey on haptic technologies for mobile augmented reality. arXiv:1709.00698 {cs}. Retrieved December 12, 2017 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00698Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Matteo Bianchi, Edoardo Battaglia, Mattia Poggiani, Simone Ciotti, and Antonio Bicchi. 2016. A wearable fabric-based display for haptic multi-cue delivery. Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), 2016 IEEE, IEEE, 277--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Tom Carter, Sue Ann Seah, Benjamin Long, Bruce Drinkwater, and Sriram Subramanian. 2013. UltraHaptics: multi-point mid-air haptic feedback for touch surfaces. Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM, 505--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Francesco Chinello, Monica Malvezzi, Claudio Pacchierotti, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2015. Design and development of a 3RRS wearable fingertip cutaneous device. Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 293--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Inrak Choi, Heather Culbertson, Mark R. Miller, Alex Olwal, and Sean Follmer. 2017. Grabity: A Wearable Haptic Interface for Simulating Weight and Grasping in Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 119--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Inrak Choi, Elliot W. Hawkes, David L. Christensen, Christopher J. Ploch, and Sean Follmer. 2016. Wolverine: A wearable haptic interface for grasping in virtual reality. Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, IEEE, 986--993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Joo ChuanáYeo and Chwee TeckáLim. 2016. Emergence of microfluidic wearable technologies. Lab on a Chip 16, 21: 4082--4090.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gareth Edwards. 2016. Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. Retrieved April 4, 2018 from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3748528/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yuan-Ling Feng, Charith Lasantha Fernando, Jan Rod, and Kouta Minamizawa. 2017. Submerged haptics: a 3-DOF fingertip haptic display using miniature 3D printed airbags. ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Emerging Technologies, ACM, 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Nadia Cheng, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2012. Jamming user interfaces: programmable particle stiffness and sensing for malleable and shape-changing devices. Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM, 519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Antonio Frisoli, Massimiliano Solazzi, Fabio Salsedo, and Massimo Bergamasco. 2008. A fingertip haptic display for improving curvature discrimination. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 17, 6: 550--561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Brian T. Gleeson, Scott K. Horschel, and William R. Provancher. 2010. Design of a fingertip-mounted tactile display with tangential skin displacement feedback. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 3, 4: 297--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Xiaochi Gu, Yifei Zhang, Weize Sun, Yuanzhe Bian, Dao Zhou, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2016. Dexmo: An inexpensive and lightweight mechanical exoskeleton for motion capture and force feedback in VR. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1991--1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Morton A. Heller. 2013. The psychology of touch. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Steven J. Henderson and Steven K. Feiner. 2002. Augmented Reality for Maintenance and Repair (ARMAR). DTIC Document. Retrieved December 4, 2012 from http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA436321Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Christian Holz, Tovi Grossman, George Fitzmaurice, and Anne Agur. 2012. Implanted User Interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), ACM, 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hyunki In, Brian Byunghyun Kang, MinKi Sin, and Kyu-Jin Cho. 2015. Exo-Glove: a wearable robot for the hand with a soft tendon routing system. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 22, 1: 97--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Adafruit Industries. Peristaltic Liquid Pump with Silicone Tubing. Retrieved April 4, 2018 from https://www.adafruit.com/product/1150Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Adafruit Industries. Adafruit Motor/Stepper/Servo Shield for Arduino v2 Kit. Retrieved April 4, 2018 from https://www.adafruit.com/product/1438Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yvonne Jansen, Thorsten Karrer, and Jan Borchers. 2010. MudPad: localized tactile feedback on touch surfaces. Adjunct proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM, 385--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hirokazu Kato and Mark Billinghurst. 1999. Marker tracking and hmd calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. Augmented Reality, 1999.(IWAR'99) Proceedings. 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on, IEEE, 85--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hwan Kim, Minhwan Kim, and Woohun Lee. 2016. Hapthimble: A wearable haptic device towards usable virtual touch screen. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3694--3705. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Seoktae Kim, Hyunjung Kim, Boram Lee, Tek-Jin Nam, and Woohun Lee. 2008. Inflatable mouse: volume-adjustable mouse with air-pressure-sensitive input and haptic feedback. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 211--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Susan J. Lederman, Georgie Thorne, and Bill Jones. 1986. Perception of texture by vision and touch: Multidimensionality and intersensory integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12, 2: 169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jaeyeon Lee and Geehyuk Lee. 2016. Designing a Non-contact Wearable Tactile Display Using Airflows. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 183--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Robert W. Lindeman, Yasuyuki Yanagida, Haruo Noma, and Kenichi Hosaka. 2006. Wearable vibrotactile systems for virtual contact and information display. Virtual Reality 9, 2--3: 203--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Yanju Liu, Rob Davidson, and Paul Taylor. 2005. Touch sensitive electrorheological fluid based tactile display. Smart materials and structures 14, 6: 1563.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Yanju Liu, Rob Davidson, and Paul Taylor. 2005. Investigation of the touch sensitivity of ER fluid based tactile display. Smart Structures and Materials 2005: Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 92--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Pedro Lopes, Alexandra Ion, You, Sijing, and Patrick Baudisch. 2018. Adding Force Feedback to Mixed Reality Experiences and Games using Electrical Muscle Stimulation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Qiuyu Lu, Chengpeng Mao, Liyuan Wang, and Haipeng Mi. 2016. Lime: Liquid metal interfaces for non-rigid interaction. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 449--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Steve Mann, Michael Georgas, and Ryan Janzen. 2006. Water jets as pixels: Water fountains as both sensors and displays. Multimedia, 2006. ISM'06. Eighth IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE, 766--772. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino. 1994. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems 77, 12: 1321--1329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Kouta Minamizawa, Souichiro Fukamachi, Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Naoki Kawakami, and Susumu Tachi. 2007. Gravity grabber: wearable haptic display to present virtual mass sensation. ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 emerging technologies, ACM, 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Vincent Miralles, Axel Huerre, Florent Malloggi, and Marie-Caroline Jullien. 2013. A review of heating and temperature control in microfluidic systems: techniques and applications. Diagnostics 3, 1: 33--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Takaki Murakami, Tanner Person, Charith Lasantha Fernando, and Kouta Minamizawa. 2017. Altered touch: miniature haptic display with force, thermal and tactile feedback for augmented haptics. ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Posters, ACM, 53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Nam-Trung Nguyen and Steven T. Wereley. 2002. Fundamentals and applications of microfluidics. Artech house.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryuma Niiyama, Lining Yao, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2014. Weight and volume changing device with liquid metal transfer. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, ACM, 49--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Claudio Pacchierotti, Gionata Salvietti, Irfan Hussain, Leonardo Meli, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2016. The hRing: A wearable haptic device to avoid occlusions in hand tracking. Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), 2016 IEEE, IEEE, 134--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Claudio Pacchierotti, Stephen Sinclair, Massimiliano Solazzi, Antonio Frisoli, Vincent Hayward, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2017. Wearable haptic systems for the fingertip and the hand: Taxonomy, review, and perspectives. IEEE transactions on haptics 10, 4: 580--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Henning Pohl, Peter Brandes, Hung Ngo Quang, and Michael Rohs. 2017. Squeezeback: Pneumatic Compression for Notifications. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 5318--5330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Hendrik Richter, Felix Manke, and Moriel Seror. 2013. LiquiTouch: liquid as a medium for versatile tactile feedback on touch surfaces. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, ACM, 315--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Martin Schmitz, Andreas Leister, Niloofar Dezfuli, Jan Riemann, Florian Müller, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2016. Liquido: Embedding Liquids into 3D Printed Objects to Sense Tilting and Motion. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2688--2696. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Samuel B. Schorr and Allison M. Okamura. 2017. Fingertip tactile devices for virtual object manipulation and exploration. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3115--3119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Dan Sheadel. 2018. MiniPID-Java: PID controller designed for quickly and easily implementing stable closed loop control. Retrieved April 4, 2018 from https://github.com/tekdemo/MiniPID-JavaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Calle Sjöström. 2001. Using haptics in computer interfaces for blind people. CHI'01 extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 245--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Rajinder Sodhi, Ivan Poupyrev, Matthew Glisson, and Ali Israr. 2013. AIREAL: interactive tactile experiences in free air. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 32, 4: 134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Naoyuki Takesue, Junji Furusho, and Yuuki Kiyota. 2004. Fast response MR-fluid actuator. JSME International Journal Series C Mechanical Systems, Machine Elements and Manufacturing 47, 3: 783--791.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Dzmitry Tsetserukou, Shotaro Hosokawa, and Kazuhiko Terashima. 2014. LinkTouch: A wearable haptic device with five-bar linkage mechanism for presentation of two-DOF force feedback at the fingerpad. Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), 2014 IEEE, IEEE, 307--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. S. Tung, J.-W. Kim, A. Malshe, C. C. Lee, and R. Pooran. 2003. A cellular motor driven microfluidic system. TRANSDUCERS, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 12th International Conference on, 2003, IEEE, 678--681.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Marynel Vázquez, Eric Brockmeyer, Ruta Desai, Chris Harrison, and Scott E. Hudson. 2015. 3d printing pneumatic device controls with variable activation force capabilities. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1295--1304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. George M. Whitesides. 2006. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442, 7101: 368.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Lining Yao, Ryuma Niiyama, Jifei Ou, Sean Follmer, Clark Della Silva, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. PneUI: pneumatically actuated soft composite materials for shape changing interfaces. Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and Technology, ACM, 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. 2018. Drip chamber. Wikipedia. Retrieved April 4, 2018 from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Drip_chamber&oldid=824568517Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Ford Pilots New Exoskeleton Technology to Help Lessen Chance of Worker Fatigue, Injury | Ford Media Center. Retrieved April 4, 2018 from https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2017/11/09/ford-exoskeleton-technology-pilot.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Solenoid Valve DC for Makeblock robot kit - STEM / DIY electronic robot Parts. Retrieved July 4, 2018 from https://store.makeblock.com/solenoid-valve-dc-12v-0520eGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. SparkFun Pressure Sensor Breakout - MS5803--14BA - SEN-12909 - SparkFun Electronics. Retrieved July 5, 2018 from https://www.sparkfun.com/products/12909Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Digital Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer (MLX90614) #Melexis. Retrieved July 5, 2018 from https://www.melexis.com/en/product/MLX90614/Digital-Plug-Play-Infrared-Thermometer-TO-CanGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Force Sensitive Resistor - Small - SEN-09673 - SparkFun Electronics. Retrieved July 5, 2018 from https://www.sparkfun.com/products/9673Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Digital plug & play infrared thermometer in a TO-can. Melexis. Retrieved April 4, 2018 from https://www.melexis.com/en/product/mlx90614/digital-plug-play-infrared-thermometer-to-canGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. HydroRing: Supporting Mixed Reality Haptics Using Liquid Flow

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UIST '18: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
        October 2018
        1016 pages
        ISBN:9781450359481
        DOI:10.1145/3242587

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 October 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        UIST '18 Paper Acceptance Rate80of375submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        UIST '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader