skip to main content
10.1145/3242969.3243003acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TapTag: Assistive Gestural Interactions in Social Media on Touchscreens for Older Adults

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Older adults want to live independently and at the same time stay socially active. We conducted contextual inquiry to understand what usability problems they face while interacting with social media on touch screen devices. We found that it is hard for active older adults to understand and learn mobile social media interfaces due to lack of support of safe interface exploration and insufficient cognitive affordances. We designed TapTag to enhance the learnability for older adults on touch screens. TapTag is an assistive gestural interaction model that utilizes muti-step single taps. TapTag breaks the interaction process to 2 steps, one gesture is to explore the user interface (UI), and the second is to activate the functionality of the UI element. We prototyped TapTag as an overlay on the top of Facebook app. We conducted a comparative study where older adults used Facebook app and Facebook with TapTag. The results showed that Facebook with TapTag provided a better user experience for older adults in terms of learnability, accessibility, and ease of use.

References

  1. 2012. Communication Between the Generations. Conference Papers -- International Communication Association (2012), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dec, 2016. The list of most popular applications in Android. https://play.google. com/store/apps/collection/topselling_freeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dec, 2016. The list of most popular applications in apple app store for iOS. https://itunes.apple.com/us/genre/ios-social-networking/id6005?mt=8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dec, 2016. Social Mobile App Ranking Top Google Play apps in United States. https://www.similarweb.com/apps/top/google/app-index/us/social/top-freeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. June, 2017. The Nation's Older Population Is Still Growing, Census Bureau Reports. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2017/cb17--100.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Robin N. Brewer and Jasmine Jones. 2015. Pinteresce: Exploring Reminiscence As an Incentive to Digital Reciprocity for Older Adults. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 243--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Niamh Caprani, Noel E. O'Connor, and Cathal Gurrin. 2012. Touch Screens for the Older User. https://www.intechopen.com/books/assistive-technologies/touch-screens-for-the-older-userGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yi-Ru Regina Chen and Peter J Schulz. 2016. The Effect of Information Communication Technology Interventions on Reducing Social Isolation in the Elderly: A Systematic Review. journal of Medical Internet Research 18, 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Min K. Chung, Dongjin Kim, Seokhee Na, and Donghun Lee. 2010. Usability evaluation of numeric entry tasks on keypad type and age. International journal of Industrial Ergonomics 40, 1 (2010), 97--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Leah Findlater, Jon E. Froehlich, Kays Fattal, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Tanya Dast- yar. 2013. Age-related Differences in Performance with Touchscreens Compared to Traditional Mouse Input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 343--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M.W.M. JASPERS G.A. WILDENBOS, L.W. PEUTE. 2015. A framework for evaluating mHealth tools for Older Patients on Usability. Digital Healthcare Empowering Europeans R. Cornet et al. (Eds.), European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Susumu Harada, Daisuke Sato, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2013. Characteristics of Elderly User Behavior on Mobile Multi-touch Devices. In Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 323--341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nic Hollinworth. 2009. Improving Computer Interaction for Older Adults. SIGAC- CESS Access. Comput. 93 (Jan. 2009), 11--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shaun K Kane, Jeffrey P Bigham, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2008. Slide rule: making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. In Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Masatomo Kobayashi, Atsushi Hiyama, Takahiro Miura, Chieko Asakawa, Michitaka Hirose, and Tohru Ifukube. 2011. Elderly User Evaluation of Mobile Touchscreen Interactions. In Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2011 , Pedro Campos, Nicholas Graham, Joaquim Jorge, Nuno Nunes, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 83--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Thomas Mahatody, Mouldi Sagar, and Christophe Kolski. 2010. State of the art on the cognitive walkthrough method, its variants and evolutions. Intl. Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 26, 8 (2010), 741--785.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Andrew R. McNeill, Lynne Coventry, Jake Pywell, and Pam Briggs. 2017. Privacy Considerations when Designing Social Network Systems to Support Successful Ageing. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6425--6437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lilian Genaro Motti, Nadine Vigouroux, and Philippe Gorce. 2013. Interaction Techniques for Older Adults Using Touchscreen Devices: A Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on L'Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 125, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lilian Genaro Motti, Nadine Vigouroux, and Philippe Gorce. 2015. Improving Accessibility of Tactile Interaction for Older Users: Lowering Accuracy Require- ments to Support Drag-and-Drop Interaction. Procedia Computer Science 67 (2015), 366--375. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Barbara Barbosa Neves, Rachel L. Franz, Cosmin Munteanu, Ronald Baecker, and Mags Ngo. 2015. "My Hand Doesn'T Listen to Me!": Adoption and Evaluation of a Communication Technology for the 'Oldest Old'. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1593--1602. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Anne Marie Piper, Raymundo Cornejo Garcia, and Robin N Brewer. 2016. Under- standing the challenges and opportunities of smart mobile devices among the oldest old. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI) 8, 2 (2016), 83--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Andrea Rosales and Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol. 2016. Smartphones, Apps and Older People's Interests: From a Generational Perspective. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 491--503. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sergio Sayago and Josep Blat. 2011. An ethnographical study of the accessibility barriers in the everyday interactions of older people with the web. Universal Access in the Information Society 10, 4 (01 Nov 2011), 359--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nicole Schneider, Janet Wilkes, Morten Grandt, and Christopher M. Schlick. 2008. Investigation of Input Devices for the Age-differentiated Design of Human-Computer Interaction. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 52, 2 (2008), 144--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Anselm Strauss and Juliet M Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Yuling Sun, Xianghua Ding, Silvia Lindtner, Tun Lu, and Ning Gu. 2014. Being Senior and ICT: A Study of Seniors Using ICT in China. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3933--3942. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hiroyuki Umemuro. 2004. Lowering Elderly Japanese Users' Resistance Towards Computers by Using Touchscreen Technology. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 3, 3-4 (Oct. 2004), 276--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mark A. Van Dyke, Carmen Haynes, and Jennifer Ferguson-Mitchell. 2007. Bridging the Divide: A Public Relations Perspective on Intergenerational Communication. Public Relations Quarterly 52, 4 (2007), 19--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Elza Venter. 2017. Bridging the communication gap between Generation Y and the Baby Boomer generation. International journal of Adolescence and Youth 22, 4 (2017), 497--507. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1267022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, Amee Morgans, Elizabeth Ozanne, and Lars Kulik. 2016. Not For Me: Older Adults Choosing Not to Participate in a Social Isolation Intervention. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 745--757. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yu Zhong, Astrid Weber, Casey Burkhardt, Phil Weaver, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2015. Enhancing Android Accessibility for Users with Hand Tremor by Reducing Fine Pointing and Steady Tapping. In Proceedings of the 12th Web for All Conference (W4A '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 29, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. TapTag: Assistive Gestural Interactions in Social Media on Touchscreens for Older Adults

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICMI '18: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
            October 2018
            687 pages
            ISBN:9781450356923
            DOI:10.1145/3242969

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 October 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            ICMI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate63of149submissions,42%Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader