skip to main content
research-article

FluidMeter: Gauging the Human Daily Fluid Intake Using Smartwatches

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 September 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Water is the most vital nutrient in the human body accounting for about 60% of the body weight. To maintain optimal health, it is important for humans to consume a sufficient amount of fluids daily. Therefore, tracking the amount of human daily fluid intake has a myriad of health applications like dehydration prevention.

In this paper, we present FluidMeter: a ubiquitous and unobtrusive system to track the amount of fluid intake leveraging the inertial sensors embedded in smartwatches. To achieve this, FluidMeter first separates the drinking activities from other human activities (playing, running, eating, etc.). Thereafter, it analyzes the sampled sensors data during the extracted drinking episodes to recognize the sequence of micro-activities (lift the bottle, sip, release the bottle) that constitute the drinking activity. Finally, it applies some machine learning algorithms on some features extracted from sampled sensor data during the sipping period to gauge the amount of fluid intake in the designated drinking episode.

FluidMeter is evaluated by collecting more than 260 hours of different human activities by 70 different participants using different smartwatch models. The results show that FluidMeter can recognize the drinking activity and its micro-activities accurately which is comparable to that achieved by the state-of-the-art techniques. Finally, FluidMeter can estimate the overall amount of fluid intake in grams accurately with a estimation error limited to 15%, highlighting its promise as a ubiquitous health service.

References

  1. Ahmad Akl and Shahrokh Valaee. 2010. Accelerometer-based gesture recognition via dynamic-time warping, affinity propagation, 8 compressive sensing. In Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2010 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2270--2273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Oliver Amft, David Bannach, Gerald Pirkl, Matthias Kreil, and Paul Lukowicz. 2010. Towards wearable sensing-based assessment of fluid intake. In Proceedings of 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops). IEEE, 298--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Oliver Amft and Gerhard Troster. 2009. On-body sensing solutions for automatic dietary monitoring. IEEE pervasive computing 8, 2 (2009), 62--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Abdelkareem Bedri, Richard Li, Malcolm Haynes, Raj Prateek Kosaraju, Ishaan Grover, Temiloluwa Prioleau, Min Yan Beh, Mayank Goel, Thad Starner, and Gregory Abowd. 2017. EarBit: Using Wearable Sensors to Detect Eating Episodes in Unconstrained Environments. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 37 (Sept. 2017), 20 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chongguang Bi, Guoliang Xing, Tian Hao, Jina Huh, Wei Peng, and Mengyan Ma. 2017. FamilyLog: A mobile system for monitoring family mealtime activities. In Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). IEEE, 21--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jia-Luen Chua, Yoong Choon Chang, Mohamed Hisham Jaward, Jussi Parkkinen, and Kok-Sheik Wong. 2014. Vision-based hand grasping posture recognition in drinking activity. In Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ISPACS), 2014 International Symposium on. IEEE, 185--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Yujie Dong, Jenna Scisco, Mike Wilson, Eric Muth, and Adam Hoover. 2014. Detecting periods of eating during free-living by tracking wrist motion. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 18, 4 (2014), 1253--1260.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Isabelle Guyon and André Elisseeff. 2003. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of machine learning research 3, Mar (2003), 1157--1182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hidrate. 2015. Hidrate Spark. (2015). http://hidratespark.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chih-Wei Hsu, Chih-Chung Chang, Chih-Jen Lin, et al. 2003. A practical guide to support vector classification. (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. IDC. 2017. SmartWatch Sales. (2017). https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS43058317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Institute of Medicine (Ed.). 2004. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Azusa Kadomura, Cheng-Yuan Li, Koji Tsukada, Hao-Hua Chu, and Itiro Siio. 2014. Persuasive technology to improve eating behavior using a sensor-embedded fork. In Proceedings of the 2014 acm international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, 319--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Haik Kalantarian, Nabil Alshurafa, and Majid Sarrafzadeh. 2016. Detection of gestures associated with medication adherence using smartwatch-based inertial sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal 16, 4 (2016), 1054--1061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Haik Kalantarian and Majid Sarrafzadeh. 2015. Audio-based detection and evaluation of eating behavior using the smartwatch platform. Computers in biology and medicine 65 (2015), 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. W Larry Kenney and Percy Chiu. 2001. Influence of age on thirst and fluid intake. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 33, 9 (2001), 1524--1532.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Simon Lacoste-Julien, Martin Jaggi, Mark Schmidt, and Patrick Pletscher. 2012. Block-coordinate Frank-Wolfe optimization for structural SVMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.4747 (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yehenew Mengistu, Minh Pham, Ha Manh Do, and Weihua Sheng. 2016. AutoHydrate: A wearable hydration monitoring system. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 1857--1862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Christopher Merck, Christina Maher, Mark Mirtchouk, Min Zheng, Yuxiao Huang, and Samantha Kleinberg. 2016. Multimodality sensing for eating recognition. In Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 130--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mark Mirtchouk, Drew Lustig, Alexandra Smith, Ivan Ching, Min Zheng, and Samantha Kleinberg. 2017. Recognizing Eating from Body-Worn Sensors: Combining Free-living and Laboratory Data. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 85 (Sept. 2017), 20 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mark Mirtchouk, Christopher Merck, and Samantha Kleinberg. 2016. Automated estimation of food type and amount consumed from body-worn audio and motion sensors. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 451--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. MOFILY. 2015. YoCam: The World's Most Versatile Waterproof Life Camera. (2015). http://www.getyocam.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Temiloluwa Prioleau, Elliot Moore II, and Maysam Ghovanloo. 2017. Unobtrusive and wearable systems for automatic dietary monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 64, 9 (2017), 2075--2089.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tauhidur Rahman, Alexander Travis Adams, Mi Zhang, Erin Cherry, Bobby Zhou, Huaishu Peng, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2014. BodyBeat: a mobile system for sensing non-speech body sounds.. In MobiSys, Vol. 14. 2--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Giovanni Schiboni and Oliver Amft. 2018. Automatic Dietary Monitoring Using Wearable Accessories. In Seamless Healthcare Monitoring. Springer, 369--412.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Yiru Shen, James Salley, Eric Muth, and Adam Hoover. 2017. Assessing the Accuracy of a Wrist Motion Tracking Method for Counting Bites Across Demographic and Food Variables. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 21, 3 (2017), 599--606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Edison Thomaz, Irfan Essa, and Gregory D Abowd. 2015. A practical approach for recognizing eating moments with wrist-mounted inertial sensing. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 1029--1040. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. TRAGO. 2015. Trago Cap. (2015). https://trago.co/pages/trago-cap.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Douglas L Vail, Manuela M Veloso, and John D Lafferty. 2007. Conditional random fields for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM, 235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tri Vu, Feng Lin, Nabil Alshurafa, and Wenyao Xu. 2017. Wearable food intake monitoring technologies: A comprehensive review. Computers 6, 1 (2017), 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Phillip Watson, Andrew Whale, Stephen A Mears, Louise A Reyner, and Ronald J Maughan. 2015. Mild hypohydration increases the frequency of driver errors during a prolonged, monotonous driving task. Physiology 8 behavior 147 (2015), 313--318.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. FluidMeter: Gauging the Human Daily Fluid Intake Using Smartwatches

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
          Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 3
          September 2018
          1536 pages
          EISSN:2474-9567
          DOI:10.1145/3279953
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 September 2018
          • Accepted: 1 September 2018
          • Revised: 1 May 2018
          • Received: 1 November 2017
          Published in imwut Volume 2, Issue 3

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader