skip to main content
10.1145/3265757.3265782acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswipsceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A congress for children and computational thinking for everyone

Published:04 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

As final event of the project "Informatics - A Child's Play?!", which aimed at introducing computational thinking in primary and secondary schools, the authors initiated the first Children's Congress in 2016 with the main theme of "Languages - Pictures - Information". This is now an annual event, where all participating children can slip into the role of researchers and present the results of their projects accomplished together with their teachers as well as teacher students of different master courses. As preparation the project teams get an introduction into computational thinking and several computer science concepts with the task of applying at least one of them in their project and the development of creative products. The themes of the Children's Congress are relatively open and fit into every subject, because our main aim is introducing computational thinking "by the way" to all participants. During their work on cross-curricular or even subject specific projects, pupils, students and teachers learn that basics of computational thinking are or can be integrated in every subject. This paper reports on the implementation and procedure of the Children's Congress and gives an overview of the projects accomplished in the first two years (2016 and 2017). It describes how and where computational thinking has been integrated and presents the main results of the evaluation gained from interviews and questionnaires.

References

  1. Charoula Angeli, Joke Voogt, Andrew Fluck, Mary Webb, Margaret Cox, Joyce Malyn-Smith, and Jason Zagami. 2016. A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: implications for teacher knowledge. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19, 3 (2016), 47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Valerie Barr and Chris Stephenson. 2011. Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads 2, 1 (2011), 48--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Nathan Bean, Joshua Weese, Russell Feldhausen, and R Scott Bell. 2015. Starting from scratch: Developing a pre-service teacher training program in computational thinking. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015 IEEE, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tim Bell, Jason Alexander, Isaac Freeman, and Mick Grimley. 2009. Computer Science Unplugged: School Students Doing Real Computing Without Computers. J. Appl. Comput. Inf. Technol. 13, 1 (2009), 20--29. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from http://www.computingunplugged.org/sites/default/files/papers/Unplugged-JACIT2009submit.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nadine Bergner, Jan Holz, and Ulrik Schroeder. 2012. InfoSphere. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education on - WiPSCE '12, 22--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Stefania Bocconi, Augusto Chioccariello, Giuliana Dettori, Anusca Ferrari, and Katja Engelhardt. 2016. Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education-Implications for policy and practice. European Commission, JRC Science for Policy Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rodger Bybee. 2015. Scientific Literacy BT - Encyclopedia of Science Education. In Richard Gunstone (ed.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 944--947.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Valentina Dagiene. The BEBRAS Contest on Informatics and Computer Literacy - Students' Drive to Science Education. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from http://www.bebras.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/DagieneV-2008.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wolfgang Gräber and Peter Nentwig. 2002. Scientific Literacy---Naturwissenschaftliche Grundbildung in der Diskussion. In Scientific Literacy. Springer, 7--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Okhee Lee. 1997. Guest editorial: Scientific literacy for all: What is it, and how can we achieve it? J. Res. Sci. Teach. Off. J. Natl. Assoc. Res. Sci. Teach. 34, 3 (1997), 219--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Roland Mittermeir and Ernestine Bischof. Informatik erLeben. Retrieved May 7, 2018 from http://informatik-erleben.aau.at/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stefan Pasterk, Barbara Sabitzer, Heike Demarle-Meusel, and Andreas Bollin. 2016. Informatics-Lab: Attracting Primary School Pupils for Computer Science. In Engineering Innovations for Global Sustainability: Proceedings of the 14th Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A Rees, Francisco J García-Peñalvo, I Jormanainen, M Tuul, and D Reimann. 2016. An overview of the most relevant literature on coding and computational thinking with emphasis on the relevant issues for teachers. Belgium TACCLE Consort. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Barbara Sabitzer, Stefan Pasterk, and Elisa Reçi. 2014. INFORMATICS-A CHILD'S PLAY?! In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN), 1081--1090.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Andreas Schwill. 2001. Ab wann kann man mit Kindern Informatik machen. Eine Stud. über informatische Fähigkeiten von Kindern. (Keil-Slawik, R. Hrsg.) Inform. und Medien. 9, (2001), 13--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Deborah Seehorn, Stephen Carey, Brian Fuschetto, Irene Lee, Daniel Moix, Dianne O'Grady-Cunniff, Barbara Boucher Owens, Chris Stephenson, and Anita Verno. 2011. CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards: Revised 2011. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Johann Stockinger and Gerald Futschek. 2016. Informatisches Denken in der Primarstufe: die Wiener Zauberschule der Informatik (WIZIK). Inform. 2016 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeannette M. Wing. 2006. Computational Thinking. Commun. ACM March 49, 3 (2006), 33--35. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wing/publications/Wing06.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Aman Yadav, Chris Mayfield, Ninger Zhou, Susanne Hambrusch, and John T. Korb. 2014. Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 14, 1 (2014), 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Printables - CS Unplugged. Retrieved May 7, 2018 from https://csunplugged.org/en/resources/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A congress for children and computational thinking for everyone

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WiPSCE '18: Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education
      October 2018
      170 pages
      ISBN:9781450365888
      DOI:10.1145/3265757

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      WiPSCE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate32of72submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate104of279submissions,37%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader